Saturday, January 12, 2008

Corrupt Ventura Superior Court derails 17 jury trial dates

SEVENTEEN  JURY  TRIAL  DATES  DERAILED.

BY  OFFICERS  OF  THE  VENTURA  COUNTY  SUPERIOR  COURT.

AND  THE  COURT'S  OWN  CASE  HEARING  RECORDS  THAT  SHOW  THAT THIS  IS  TRUE.

RECONCILE  THESE  FACTS  WITH; 
 
DUE  PROCESS;  AND  EQUAL  PROTECTION  UNDER  THE  LAW.

On April 7th, 2003, 463 days after my arrest on December, 27th 2001, for a simple possession charge, my first of seventeen jury trial dates, was seconds away from beginning.

Except that it didn't. In my wildest dreams, I never would have imagined that it would be another 530 plus days before my trial finally did begin, on September 20th, 2004.

Below, I have listed each trial date that the court set, and the illegal, and unethical procedural tricks, traps, and deciets, that every officer of the Ventura County Superior Court that was involved in the disposition of this case, utilized to bring about the Law's abort.

I also detail why so many officers of this court worked so hard, and risked so much, to block the truth from being entered into the court's record, and heard by members of a jury.

Hold on, it's a long hard ride from beginning to end, without civil liberties protections, or even one fleeting glimpse of Justice off in the distance.

That's because in Ventura County;
Justice is not only blind.
She's been bound, gagged,
and is being held incommunicado.
In a windowless room.
At an undisclosed location.

HELP ME FREE HER.

FIRST TRIAL DATE April 7th, 2003
After 15 months in "case hearing Hell", jury trial was finally set to start in court room 45. Judge Kevin McGee presiding.

Derailed until May, 5th,2003.
By prosecution lying to the court and defense, as to reason that delay was needed. Gaining an unwarranted delay to the start of trial by deception.

Senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, lied to both the court, and defense to gain this last second, delay to the of the start of trial. Needing my agreement, she falsely stated that the delay was needed so that she could send to North Carolina, for my 32 year old, 1970 involuntary manslaughter conviction records.

Stating on the record, to both the court and defense, that the second strike attach-ment; "most likely wasn't applicable, because Mr. Wilson wasn't a part of the blooding."

This was one, of four reasons that the strike attachment wasn't applicable. The second, third, and fourth reasons that the strike allegation wasn't applicable are these;

(2nd reason)
The second strike was being sought in conjunction with an offer of probation. If I would; "swear, and sign under penalty of perjury," that the prosecutions version was the truth.

When you are offered prop 36 probation, at your first hearing, and a strike is only sought months after you refuse probation, and insist on a jury trial, but the offer of probation isn't rescinded, then;

The only thing that this is indicitive of is an attempt by the prosecution to frighten a truthful man into abandoning his desire to have his testimony heard, and weighed by a jury, as to its veracity and import. To keep his testimony, and the juries assessment of it, from being entered into the public record.

(3rd reason)
The prosecution was treating second strike as if it were the third strike.
Which can be for any felony.

This was a simple possession case.
(OK. Not so simple. But that is the prosecution's fault, not mine.)

(4th reason)
The 1970 conviction that the prosecution used as a vehicle to attach this strike allegation was beyond the "ten years past completion of sentence" stricture.
It was 19 years past that point.

*NOTE:
The prosecution knew this was an illegal, unwarranted strike attachment, for several reasons.
Yet they sought it none the less.

*My court appointed counsel knew this was an illegal, unwarranted strike attachment.
But refused to utter one word against its attachment to my charge.

*The judge most certainly knew that this was an illegal, unwarranted strike attachment.
Yet allowed the prosecution to greatly exceed their lawful reach.

*All these things taken together are indicitive of officers of the court, that have shown themselves to be; the enemy of the very Laws that they swore a sacred oath to; "Protect, and Defend."

D.D.Atty. Taylor went on to say that she needed to see my (1970) conviction records, before she could remove the strike allegation from my present charge.

Knowing that I would almost certainly give her this delay for the purpose of getting rid of the strike attachment, that mandated a mandatory sentence of six years.

I did. Based upon the prosecution's stated reason.
(Which I later learned was a lie.)

In the hopes of returning the case to; "normal sentence guidlines" which said that a sentence of 6 months, to eighteen months, was the appropriate sentence, if found guilty at trial.

The Ventura County Superior Court's own guidleines state that both the prosecution, and the defense, should be ready to;
Drop charges (prosecution)
Or plead guilty,(defense)
Or go to trial, within 300 days of charges being brought;
"except in the most complex cases, and the most serious crimes."

My charges, and case had neither of these elements. It was a simple possession case.

My word against two Oxnard police officers.

You would think that the prosecution would have been ready for this one at the end of 90 days. I would have been ready. If I had a public defender that would have done anything that I told him that I needed to be done.

Instead, here we were, finally at my first trial date. Which the prosecution hastily delays. For the first of seventeen times, 463 days after charges were brought.

On this day, even with this delay, I would have never believed that I would not get to the start of my jury trial for another 530 days.

On that day, 530 plus days away from my first trial date of 4-7-2003, on September, 20th, 2004.

When I finally did start my trial, I had to grin when the prosecution said to the jury; "This is a simple case, that resulted from a typical, by the book arrest."

He never mentioned which book. It certainly wasn't the Law's.

But d.d.atty. Taylor had to think fast on April 7th, 2003. Because a judge, that wasn't privy to the prosecutions reluctance to have two Oxnard police officers perjure themselves on the stand, noticed that this case was already a half a year over the maximum time that a case was to be allowed to languish in case hearing purgatory.

Upon this judge's discovery of this fact, he stated to both the prosecution and defense;

"This (case) has gone on way to long. I am ordering the prosecution, and defense to report to the fourth floor, courtroom 45, forthwith. Trial will begin immediately."

So that's what we did. Myself at the defense table, and senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor at the prosecutions table.

Several minutes later, a pool of potential jurors files between our respective tables, to be chambered in a room behind, and to the side of where the judge would preside over this matter.

We were seconds away from the start of trial, when d.d.atty. Taylor jumped up, and requested the 30 day delay.

The judge, with an exasperated tone, queried; "For what?"

Knowing that she needs my agreement, she tosses out the only reason that should have enough value to me to gain my agreement. Removing the second strike attachment, which mandated a mandatory sentence of six years, if convicted, from my charge of simple possession.

Unfortunately for me at that time, and her at this point, her stated reason was a lie.

********************************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
04072003 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Apr 07, 2003 at 08:30 AM.
04072003 2 Judge Riley , Ken W.
04072003 3 Judicial Assistant - Balam , Evelyn K.
04072003 4 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
04072003 5 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
04072003 6 Deputy District AttorneyTaylorpresent.
04072003 7 Case assigned toCourtroom 45forJURY TRIALto begin04/07/03at10:30 AM.
04072003 8 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
04072003 9 The court orders you to appear.
04072003 10 File located to courtroom #45.
04072003 11 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 45 on Apr 07, 2003 at 10:30 AM.
04072003 12 Judge McGee , Kevin J.
04072003 13 Judicial Assistant - Perez , Angelita G.
04072003 14 Court Reporter -Andre , Teri Tis present.
04072003 15 The defendant is present in court.
04072003 16 Deputy District AttorneyCatherine Taylorpresent.
04072003 17 At10:52 AM:
04072003 18 Court is in session. All parties are present.
04072003 19 Court, Counsel and Defendant discuss pre-trial matters as set forth on the record
04072003 20 Defense request re:for transcript of Marsden Proceedingsisdeniedby the Court.
04072003 21 Court insructs the Clerk to call for a panel of 55 prospective jurors and place them on hold
04072003 22 Parties to exchange witness lists
04072003 23 The court ordersThe parties to meet and confer.
04072003 24 The court is in recess until 01:30 PM
04072003 25 At01:40 PM:
04072003 26 Court is in session. All parties are present.
04072003 27 Defense request re:copy of transcript regarding suppression motion held on 11/14/02isgrantedby the Court.
04072003 28 The court ordersCourt Report Kathleen Tillquist prepare a transcript for proceedings held on 11/14/02. Transcript to be made available to Courtroom Clerk in Department 45 the morning of 4/9/03. Clerk is instructed to make the transcript
04072003 29 Case continued to05/05/03at09:00 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
04072003 30 Time waived to05/05/03plus 30 days.
04072003 31 The court ordersparties continue discovery of witnesses names, addresses and telephone numbers.
04072003 32 The court orders you to appear.
04072003 33 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
04112003 1 District Attorney Catherine Taylor picked up copy of Transcript for proceedings of 11/14/02
05052003 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on May 05, 2003 at 09:00 AM.
05052003 2 Judge Brodie , Edward F.
05052003 3 Judicial Assistant - Robles , Inez.
05052003 4 Court Reporter -De La O , Kathleenis present.
05052003 5 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
05052003 6 Deputy District AttorneyCatherine Taylorpresent.
05052003 7 Case continued to05/28/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
05052003 8 The last date for trial is06/30/03.
05052003 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
05052003 10 The court orders you to appear.
05052003 11 The court ordersParties are to continue discovery of witness names..
05052003 12 File located to Ventura Records.
05282003 1 Case is transferred from05/28/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14to JURYTRIAL JT toCourtroom 14on5/28/2003at01:30 PM.
05282003 2 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on May 28, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
05282003 3 Judge Brodie , Edward F.
05282003 4 Judicial Assistant - Robles , Inez.

******************************************************************************
SECOND TRIAL DATE: May 5th, 2003.
The second DERAILMENT to the start of trial.
Requested by the prosecution. Agreed to by the defense. Granted by the court. Trial reset to start on May 28th, 2003.

By yet another round of lying to the court, and defense, as to why this extension of another month was needed.

Senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, stating on the record, that she was; "still waiting for North Carolina to send her my (1970) conviction records."

RECORDS THAT SHE NEVER SENT FOR.

I was unaware at that time as to just how unwilling the prosecution was to let this matter be heard by a jury. I had been brought up to believe that judges, prosecutors, and public defenders were dedicated, honest, and ethical people for the most part.

I imagined that the main reason that the prosecution had initially attached the second strike allegation was because of a "shared enforcement attitude" between the police, and prosecution. Which meant that I wasn't the one in this process that was going to get the benefit of the doubt.

By the end of these two thirty day delays, that the prosecution gained by lying to the court and defense;

With my RV (home) set on fire, with some flamable liquid squirted through the side window, all over my mattress, and then ignited.

(That a friend noticed almost immediately after it began, and kept knocked down, and localized to that one area, by grabbing the large commercial extinquisher from the Chevron gas station that I was parked behind.

A fire that took the Oxnard fire Dept. over 10 minutes to respond to Even though their fire station was only two blocks away.

A fire that no Oxnard fire fighter talked to me at all about. Even though I arrived shortly after they did, and people notified them that; "Here comes the owner of the RV."

A fire that no Oxnard police officer ever showed up on the scene of, to take a report, or investigate.)

With my RV (home) ticketed repeatedly, (3,000 dollars worth) then impounded; This activity beginning within 5 days after the intentionaly set fire in my RV didn't destroy my home.

With 5 of my friends told by an Oxnard police officer that; "they were next" if I was allowed to eat, sleep, rest, shower, or use the phone;

With the addition of two more bogus arrests, at my place of employment to get me fired; Starting with my arrest on April 20th, 2003, by Oxnard police officer Brislinger.

Who was responding to Sue Mullins 911 call for protection from her ex-boyfriend, Adam Higley.

Who had falsely imprisoned her for three days, less than six months previously. Choking and beating her, and threatening to kill her.

This officer, brushing her aside, refusing to look at her temporary restraining order that detailed all of this, to arrest me because, as he stated; "Yeah, you look high."

An officer that stated to Sue Mullins, while handcuffing me; "I'll give you a 5 minute head start on Adam." (Higley) Revealing that he knew who her ex-boyfriend was, and what consequences she faced from Adam Higley, if she was still there when the police officer departed the scene, to transport me to jail.

With the last two weeks of the second delay to the start of my jury trial spent in jail; Because of my second false arrest at my place of employment, on May 15th, 2003.

At which the same senior deputy district attorney that said the two 30 day delays were needed to send for my records; "so that second stike could be with- drawn."

Was now telling a judge not to set bail in any amount. Because the district attorneys office was seeking another strike attachment on the new charge. And if I lost at trial on both counts, I would recieve a mandatory 25 to life prison sentence.

I was forced to abandon my life long belief that it was an inherent decency, and strong ethical code that motivated most of those that professed their service to the law, and its defense. (At least in this county. As concerns the financial well being of Tiger Real Estate Fund LP's owners.)

That was something else precious to me that was stolen by these people.

THIRD TRIAL DATE:
May 28th, 2003
Trial was once again derailed.
Re-scheduled for June, 13th, 2003.

By a block being placed on my being brought from cell to court, for the start of my trial. That the Ventura County Sheriffs Department's legal unit head, (E. Hobin) couldn't get lifted. With two hours in which to accomplish a transfer that takes 5 to 7 minutes, (through an underground tunnel that connected the jail with the court) and a willingness to comply with a lawful court order to produce me in court.

Sending me a letter that afternoon, to let me know that she tried. It had her official Ventura County Sheriff Dept.'s, legal unit letter head. Signed and dated.

It said; "I am very sorry Mr. Wilson; Despite my best efforts, I could not get you into court for the start of your trial." This period of time to me was the legal equivalent of a knock down, drag out, wide eyed nightmare.

Little did I know that this was just round one, of a no round limit, illegal donneybrook.
*****************************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
05282003 5 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
05282003 6 The defendant fails to appear in court.
05282003 7 Deputy District AttorneyRoger Inmanpresent.
05282003 8 Warrant to issue Bench Warrant - Fail to Appear - 978.5 PC. Bail is $20,000.00. Mandatory appearance.
05282003 9 Thejury trialis ordered vacated.
06022003 1 Case calendared to06/02/03at09:00 AMinCourtroom 11forWarrant Issues (Conversion).
06022003 2 Calendar Line set for06/02/03inCourtroom 11at09:00 AMwith a reason on calendar of:WARRANT WChas been cancelled.
06032003 1 Case calendared to06/03/03at09:00 AMinCourtroom 11forARRAIGNMENT WARR.
06032003 2 Warrant Heard in Courtroom 11 on Jun 03, 2003 at 09:00 AM.
06032003 3 Judge Cloninger , James P.
06032003 4 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
06032003 5 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
06032003 6 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
06032003 7 Deputy District AttorneyMcGrewpresent.
06032003 8 Case continued to06/13/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
06032003 9 The last date for trial is06/30/03.
06032003 10 Defendant provided copy of preliminary transcript
06032003 11
06032003 12 The court orders you to appear.
06032003 13 Defendant is ordered discharged from custody on this case.
06032003 14 Signature Required
06032003 15 File located to Ventura Records.
06032003 16 At02:20 PM, the matter is recalled on the Court's calendar.
06032003 17 The defendant is present in court.
06032003 18
06032003 19 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
06032003 20 Deputy District AttorneyMcGrewpresent.
06032003 21 Case continued to06/16/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forReference.
06032003 22 Case continued to06/17/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
06032003 23 Calendar line set for06/13/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIALis now vacated.
06032003 24 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
06032003 25 The court orders you to appear.
06032003 26 Defendant not in custody on this matter..
06032003 27 File located to Ventura Records.
06032003 28 Estabished: Miscellaneous Account letter sent.
06162003 1 Reference Heard in Courtroom 11 on Jun 16, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
06162003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
06162003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
06162003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
06162003 5 The defendant is present in court.
06162003 6 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
06162003 7 Deputy District AttorneyDaypresent.
06162003 8 TheDefensedeclares a doubt as to defendant's mental competency.
06162003 9 Criminal proceedings suspended and civil proceedings commence
06162003 10 The court appointsBarker , Patrickto examine defendant pursuant to1368 PC.
06162003 13 260 Maple Court, Suite 129, Ventura, CA; 654-1018
06162003 14 Case continued to07/14/03at09:00 AMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
06162003 15 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
06162003 16 The court orders you to appear.
06162003 17 File located to Ventura Records.

*******************************************************************************
FOURTH TRIAL DATE: June 13th, 2003.
Jury trial date was vacated,
(THAT'S A FANCY WORD FOR; DERAILED)

By judge Cloninger, on June 3rd, 2003
With out any discussion.
Re-scheduled for June 17th, 2003.

This was on the day, (6-3-03) that judge Cloninger illegally, and coercively forces me to; "give up my right to speak in my own legal defense."

By tieing my release from jail on an O.R. bail, on a charge that was classified as "no bail" to my taking a pre-positioned, pre-determined, (by judge Cloninger) public defender, Randy Tucker on all my charges, after two weeks inside jail.

This was judge Cloninger's direct response to my attempting to bring misconduct charges, (2) counts, against the senior deputy district attorney I was up against, (Catharine Taylor) and showing him that I could prove misconduct.

When I tried to get judge Cloninger to convene a misconduct hearing on this date, by stating to him, in court, and on the record;

"I want to file two counts of prosecutorial misconduct against senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor. For twice lying to the court, and defense, to gain two unwarranted, and illegal delays to the start of my jury trial."

I went on by telling judge Cloninger; "The first time she lied, was on April 7th , 2003. When she requested a 30 day delay to the start of my trial to, as she stated on the record; "send to North Carolina, for a copy of my 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction records."

Her stated reason for needing these records was to "verify that I wasn't eligible" for the second strike attachment to my charge." So that it (strike) could be removed."

"The second time she lied was a month later, on May 5, 2003. When she stated on the record that she was still waiting for my 32 year old conviction records. For the same stated reason."

"On May 20th, just two weeks after her last stating on the record that she needed these records "to remove the strike" from my charge, she states on the record at my preliminary hearing on a new possession charge, that the prosecution is going to seek that an additional strike be attached to this new charge.

Telling the judge that if I lost at trial on both charges that I would recieve a mandatory 25 to life sentence.

That because of such a severe sentence, I was a potential flight risk. Ending with; "For this reason, we (the district attorneys office) feel that bail set at any amount should be denied."

I then told judge Cloninger, that during these two 30 day delays to the start of my trial;

That I was arrested twice at my place of employment.

Also that the Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) told the bartender to tell the owners; "If you want to keep your liquor license, let Mikey (me) go."

About the arson fire on my RV, (in the middle of a shopping center) that no responding fire fighter talked to me about.

Also that no Oxnard police officer responded to. About the same Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) placing over $3,000 in tickets on my RV then impounding it.

About the same Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) telling 5 of my friends; "You let Mikey eat, sleep, rest, shower, or use the phone, you're next."

About deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor's "volunteering" for rookie d.d.atty. arraignment detail, to "short-stop" me at arraigment.

About her 180 degree, on the record, change of statements on May 20th, from what her stated intentions as to my strike attachment were two weeks previous to that date, on (May 5th) and four weeks previous to that date on April 7th, 2003.

About the block being placed on my being brought from my cell, to trial, on May 28th, that the head of the; Ventura County Sheriffs Department's Legal Unit (Her name is E. Hobin) could not over ride.

Showing him the letter from her, to that effect.

I then told judge Cloninger; That based upon all of these illegal actions, (by police and jail personnel) coupled with senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor's deceptive statements, (on the record) and actions (in open court) to both the court and defense; That I believe that d.d. atty. Taylor has lied to both this court, and the defense, when she stated that she needed these two 30 delays to the start of my trial to secure my 32 year old conviction records.

I am sure that he wasn't surprised that I had "put two, and two" together. But figured; "suspecting something, and proving something," are two different things.

But when I told him that I wanted to see verification from the District Attorney's Office, that D.D.Atty. Catharine Taylor, had indeed sent to North Carolina, for my 32 year old conviction records, between the dates of; April 7th, 2003, and May 5th, 2003.

Because if they couldn't produce verification, then they lied to the court and defense twice, to ilegally deny me my right to speedy trial.

Judge Cloniger knew that I had stumbled on the "End Game Win" if he abided by the law, and convened a misconduct hearing before my case proceeded any further.

He wasn't "allowed" to let these proceedings end in this manner.

This is evidenced by the fact that what he has to do to regain control of me, and silence me totally, as to what I can get into the public record, couldn't be done unless;
This judge is willing;
A court appointed counsel is willing
A court certified psychologist is willing;
and;
The Mental health director for the County of Ventura, is willing;

To commit high federal felonies.
In concert with each other.
Repeatedly.
That carry many years in federal prison on each and every count.

AND EACH TIME THAT THEY DO, THEY MUST LEAVE DAMNING EVIDENCE OF THEIR GUILT IN THE COURT'S OWN RECORD.

This is something that no one is going to do, unless there is something, and that means someone, that they fear more than spending the rest of their lives in prison.

Some one ordered these people to; "Fall on their swords." And they did.

From here on out, everything that every officer of this court does, is done with the knowledge that; "There it is, right there in the record. Evidence of my guilt."

It is amazing how many officers of this court have saved all their fear of displeasing someone; That trumps the wrath of federal prosecutors, and judges, and the hellish penalties that they can make real, and lifelong in these peoples lives.

They had their orders. They had a plan. It was a stupid plan. But it is still working. So I guess it wasn't that stupid.

The plan was illegal as all get out, and this was just the first phase.
******************************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
06162003 18 Calendar line set for06/17/03at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIALis now vacated.
07142003 1 Case is transferred from07/14/03at09:00 AMinCourtroom 11to HEARING COMP toCourtroom 11on7/14/2003at01:30 PM.
07142003 2 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Jul 14, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
07142003 3 Judge Coleman , Donald D.
07142003 4 Judicial Assistant - Flores , Jacqueline.
07142003 5 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
07142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyAcostapresent.
07142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
07142003 8 The defendant fails to appear in court.
07142003 9 A bench warrant in the amount of$20,000.00is ordered held until07/16/03.
07142003 10 Case continued to07/16/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forBench Warrant Hold.
07142003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
07142003 12 File located to courtroom #11.
07162003 1 Bench Warrant Hold Heard in Courtroom 11 on Jul 16, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
07162003 2 Judge Coleman , Donald D.
07162003 3 Judicial Assistant - Flores , Jacqueline.
07162003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
07162003 5 The defendant is present in court.
07162003 6 Deputy District AttorneyLeepresent.
07162003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
07162003 8 Case continued to08/05/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
07162003 9 The bench warrant hold, previously ordered, is now vacated.
07162003 10 The defendant's request for an O.R. release isgranted.
07162003 11 The court orders you to appear.
07162003 12
07162003 13 Signature Required
07162003 14 File located to Ventura Records.
08012003 1 Case calendared to08/01/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forMISC MC.
08012003 2 Miscellaneous (Conversion) Heard in Courtroom 11 on Aug 01, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
08012003 3 Judge Coleman , Donald D.
08012003 4 Judicial Assistant - Lancaster , Veronica D.
08012003 5 Court Reporter -Moreno , Denise Mis present.
08012003 6 The defendant is not present in court.
08012003 7 Deputy District AttorneyTaylorpresent.
08012003 8 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
08012003 9 The court date of08/05/03remains as previously ordered.
08012003 10 The case is off calendar-no action is taken.
08052003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Aug 05, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
08052003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
08052003 3 Judicial Assistant - Flores , Jacqueline.
08052003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
08052003 5 The defendant is present in court.
08052003 6 Deputy District AttorneyTaylorpresent.
08052003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
08052003 8 Case continued to08/08/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
08052003 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
08052003 10 The court orders you to appear.
08082003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Aug 08, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
08082003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
08082003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
******************************************************************************
FIFTH TRIAL DATE: June 17th, 2003,
Jury trial date is derailed on June 16th, 2003. At a reference hearing.
That was also set on June 3rd, 2003. For this exact purpose.

This was "phase 2" of the plan to move past the month by month delays to the start of trial, and just take "right to a speedy trial," right on out of the picture.

The judge, (Cloninger) on June 3rd, 2003, had coercively, and illegally attached the condition of giving up my right to speak in my own defense, if I wanted to be released from jail. I did so to get out of jail.

My new court appointed counsel, Randy Tucker that was pre-picked by judge Cloninger, and pre-positioned by the arraignment cage, for what came next.

Which was to request a competency hearing.
With public defender Randy Tucker's very first words as my counsel.

With out ever talking to me.

With no history ever of mental health problems, treatment, or recommendations for such.

With no one in my life ever recommending that I should even switch to decaffienated coffee.

With no outbursts at all, in the 19 months that I had been reporting to court.

With no officer of the court ever complaining about my behavior, or ability to understand the proceedings, or of my exhibiting an inability to articulate what I wanted to say to the court.

Evidently, none of these "indicators" of mental health problems are needed.

Not when every one from judge, prosecutor, public defender, court certified psychologist, and county mental health director are lined up in opposition to the rule of law, and what was true being entered into the courts record, and weighed by a jury, as to its veracity and import.

AS AN ADDED BONUS; MY RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL VANISHES WITH THESE FIRST WORDS OF MY "ILLUSION OF COUNSEL."

Because the right to a speedy trial is only a right in criminal court.

Competency hearings are a product of civil court. Where there is no "right to speedy trial."

My right to speedy trial was literally stolen from me in the; "Blink of an eye."

If this last statement sounds a little too melodramatic for you, then don't take my word for it. Look at the next line after; "defense declares doubt as to defendents mental competency," in the case hearing docket entries, of June, 16th, 2003.

It says; Criminal proceedings suspended. Civil proceedings commence.

My right to a speedy trial was negated for over 8 months.

These souless individuals were hoping that it would have been denied to me for 6 years.

As it very easily could have been. And if that had been the case. What, if anything that was left of my spirit, mind and body, would have been no threat to these people.

This was there hope. This was their wish. That I would lose my sanity, will, intellect, credibility and desire to bring these people before the court to answer for such crimes as few men in our prisons could bring themselves to commit.

Two one hour "sessions" with a court certified psychologist (Patrick Barker) later; I am "found" to be incompetent to stand trial.

Due to an inability to co-operate with my; "coerced into taking,(by judge Cloninger) if I wanted out of jail" attorney, who had never spoken to me.

Don't you have to exhibit the former, (non co-operation) to gain the latter? (finding of incompetency)

This lack of co-operation brought about, according to court. certified. psychologist. Patrick Barker, by the "one" delusional belief that he discovered me to be suffering from.

Which was; (Hold onto your socks!) My belief that; "I couldn't get a fair trial in Ventura County!"

Yes it is upon this firmly held belief of mine that this; quack! quack! quack! (did you hear something?) mental Mengale decided to hang all his insightful discoveries, as to my nature.

To bastardize the words of the great word bastardizer himself, Dan Quayle; "A wasted mind is a terrible thing."

The good (for nothing) doctor determining that this belief was so firmly entrenched, that I wouldn't stand still for my illegal slaughter, that this court was attempting to carry out, under the guise of legallity.

This western culture, due process vulture, court certified, equal protection "denied!" witch doctor gussied up his "finding" by his skillful use of convoluted, pretzel logic rationalizations. Which, if taken at face value, uhhh, still don't make a **** of sense.

His contradictory meaningless meanings would suggest that it is the physician that is in need of being restrained, remanded, heavily medicated, and transported to that place where reality beckons, "like a shimmering light." To most that are there.

Sadly, remaining an elusive creature, occassionally sighted off in the distance, but never grasped. This court, (who should be certified) psychologist could list his time spent there on his resume as; "being on sabbatical"

Poetic justice is better than none.

ALSO: That as long as this finding was in effect, I couldn't fire the souless s.o.b. that did this to me.

You see, as long as this "finding" is in effect; I'm not "well" enough to make such serious decisions for my self.

So I'm welded to this demonic little imp's side through each hearing, where he makes sure that nothing that will aid me in any way makes it into the court's record.

All the while, showboating like he's Larry H. "I fight for you!" Parker.
(The accident injury lawyer seen in late night TV commercials on almost every channel in southern Calif.)

As to my repeated requests to appeal this finding? Well that is just one more right that he made sure was kept far from me.

LET US NOT FORGET;
The stigma associated with being viewed as; "mentally ill" that taints every thing that you offer up truthfully to the jury for their consideration, with an extra thick coating of;"this can't be true".

Branded as a; "paranoid, and delusional" creature that sees sinister cabals, and craven hearted conspiracies, from one end of the court, to the other. Poor guy. You might as well stick a sign on me that says; GUILTY!
*******************************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
08082003 4 Court Reporter -Ignacio , Susanis present.
08082003 5 The defendant is present in court.
08082003 6 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
08082003 7 Deputy District AttorneyTaylorpresent.
08082003 8 Both parties stipulate to the following: doctors report .
08082003 9 All parties waives jury.
08082003 10 Refer to Mental Health for Placement Recommendation.
08082003 11 The court finds the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, understand proceedings or cooperate with counsel; pursuant to the provisions of Section 1368 of the Penal Code.
08082003 12 This entry is made to restore the case to the Court's control.
08082003 13 Criminal proceedings are suspended/civil proceedings are instituted.
08082003 14 Case continued to08/22/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forPlacement.
08082003 15 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
08082003 16 File located to courtroom #11.
08222003 1 HEARING PLACE Heard in Courtroom 11 on Aug 22, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
08222003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
08222003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
08222003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
08222003 5 The defendant is present in court.
08222003 6 Deputy District AttorneyWoldpresent.
08222003 7 Public DefenderMilesis present in court.
08222003 8 Case continued to09/09/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
08222003 9 The court orders you to appear.
08222003 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
08222003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
09092003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Sep 09, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
09092003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
09092003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09092003 4 Court Reporter -Ignacio , Susanis present.
09092003 5 The defendant is present in court.
09092003 6 Deputy District AttorneyMcGrewpresent.
09092003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
09092003 8 Case continued to09/30/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
09092003 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09092003 10 The court orders you to appear.
09092003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
09302003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Sep 30, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
09302003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
09302003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09302003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
09302003 5 The defendant is present in court.
09302003 6 Deputy District AttorneyRidleypresent.
09302003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
09302003 8 Case continued to10/14/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
09302003 9 The court orders you to appear.
09302003 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09302003 11 Defendant ordered to contact Marla Beimforde at 505 Poli Street in Ventura, 652-7592
09302003 12 File located to Ventura Records.
10142003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 14, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10142003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10142003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
*********************************************************************************
It was almost three months after they had this bogus finding of incompetency, which mandated by law, my immediate remand to custody, and transfer to Patton State Hospital, on the date the finding of incompetency was entered into the courts record, before they finally did so.

This period of time was used by judge Cloninger, mental health director Marla Biemforde,and my public (enemy) defender (of the lie) Randy Tucker;In a futile attempt to get me to sign a Ventura County Mental Health Dept. assessment form that stated; "I have mental health problems, and I am asking the county of Ventura's Mental Health Dept. to assist me with treatment."

I was ordered back to court every two weeks, where judge Cloninger, and p.d. Tucker would promise me that "if" I would sign this form, they would "fix it" so that I would be treated as an outpatient for my incompetency, as opposed to my being; "locked away in Patton State Hosp." as they would put it.

I refused. Finally, on October, 27th, 2003. Judge Cloninger convened a sham remand hearing in court room 11. At 3:00 p.m.

The court was cleared of everyone but those that were a part of what was going down. A male court stenographer that I had never seen before was there.
Judge Cloninger;
p.d. Tucker;
Marla Biemforde;
d.d.atty. Inman,
and two bailliffs.

When I entered the court room, I was accompanied by two friends. Randal Shorts, and Rose Macias. It was immediately obvious that my friends, and potential witnesses were not wanted in the court room.

This made clear by the fact that before they could take a seat, one bailliff took Rose Macias outside the court room, and the other bailliff took Randal Shorts to the back of it.

Both were brusquely asked; "What are you doing here?"

Then; "What is your relation to Mr. Wilson?"

Both of my friends told the bailliffs that they were just friends, and that they had given me a ride to court, and were waiting to see if I needed a ride back home afterward.

What they didn't know was this; Rose Macias, was the former commissioner of community relations, for the city of Oxnard. As such, her job was as an oversight investigator of city govt. malfeasance, and corruption. She was also a graduate of the Ventura County Police, and Sheriffs Acadamy.

Randal Shorts was a twenty plus year union member longshoreman at the Port of Hueneme.

Satisfied after seeing their I.D.'s that they were not reporters, or represenatives of some state or federal agency, they were allowed to stay.

Both were witness to my character being slandered and maligned by Marla Biemforde, who ascribed to me just about every defect of mental ability, and impairment of reason, and logic that is known to man.

This is a woman who I had "talked" to for less than an hour.

A woman who slammed her hand down on her desk with great force, then leaned towards me with as hateful a look on her face, as I had ever seen on anyones to say; "You sign this paper right now! Or you're going to be locked away in Patton." When I told her that I wasn't going to sign the form that said; "I have mental health problems, and I am asking the Ventura County Mental Health Dept. to assist me with them."

Telling her that I didn't believe that this statement was true.

Both of my friends were witness to the fact that judge Cloninger stated that no cross examination of her satements was allowed!

Both of my friends, Rose Macias, and Randal Shorts, had known me for years.

Both of these people had seen my actions, behavior, and emotional states on an almost daily basis for years. My ups, and downs. Good times, and not so good. Both will tell you that they had never witnessed any erratic behavioral activities, such as Marla Biemforde described.

No bizzare emotional states, no delusional beliefs that were; "devoid of reason or logic."

Neither of these people had observed any lapses in my cognitive ability to deal with life's problems, in a "level headed" manner. None of this made any difference.

They were already close to three months past the date that the finding of incompetency was entered into the record.

Almost three months beyond the date that the law mandated my immediate remand to custody, and transfer to a state mental hospital. "For treatment, and evaluation."

This remand was now ordered by judge Cloninger.

I asked judge Cloninger for a; "One day stay of this remand, to get my affairs in order."

Judge Cloninger granted this with a grin. They all were grinning.

I believe that this "grin fest" was the result of these co-conspirators thinking that this one day stay was requested by me to; "Get the hell out of Dodge!"

In reality, I requested the one day stay of the courts remand order, so that the court's record would reflect this fact;

That at 3:00p.m. the next afternoon; I, Glen Michael Wilson, walked into that court room of my own volition.

Unassisted, unshackled, and reporting as the court had ordered.

The looks of anger, worry, and depression that I saw on their collective faces when I did report the next day as ordered, made the walk over to the bailliff to be shackled, and hustled off to jail, and then from their to a state mental hospital, for God only knows how long, a little easier to do.

I dredged up a grin from somewhere, and kept my eyes locked on judge Cloningers, who wasn't grinning today.

I was polite, but in a dismissive sort of way. Saying to judge Cloninger; "I am here as the court has ordered."

Cloninger, looking depressed said; "Yes. You are."

I then said; "I have told you before; I have great respect for the rule of law." Then I finished with; "It's a shame that more people don't feel the same."

Judge Cloninger had nothing to say about that.

I DO HAVE GREAT RESPECT FOR THE RULE OF LAW.

No matter that this was an illegal, unwarranted, travesty of justice on as grand a scale as I would ever be able to imagine.

I have no right to demand that these lawless individuals who have gained control of this county's court, be held accountable for their lawless disregard of the law's of this land, if I can rationalize my way out of doing the same.

I am a member of this society. I benefit greatly from this being so.

I must honor the social contract of my society. If I am to have any honor of my own.

Even when I am wronged, or my treatment is unjust.

If my treatment is wrong, and I percieve this to be true, then I am obligated to help in the search for, or creation of a practical remedy.

If I have been treated unjustly, or see that others have been, I do not blame the Law.

This is the result of Law's servants forsaking their sacred oath.

This is the result of Law's servants betraying the people who have bestowed great honor upon them, and entrusted them with great powers.

When treated unjustly by Law's servants, who no longer serve the Law;

I ready myself for battle. For they will not give this power that they now use to shield themselves, and their activities from the Law's judgement, and Justice's reckoning, over to true servants of the Law without a fight. For to do so will result in their destruction.

If I can not secure the aid of Law's servants in this battle, I must wage it none the less. Until the Law's power, and its mechanisms for implementig Law's powers have been wrested from the lawless. Who have gained control of Law's authority to negate the Law.

I will engage them in battle in every possible way that I can that isn't suicidal.

Until I have won, or I am dead.

And on the day that I can no longer believe that there are true servants of the Law, to be found in the enforcement agencies of this county, this state, and our federal government, that; "serve Justice" Then I will seek Law's servants where ever they might be. And "Justice will be served."

And while Justice is equitable, and fair, that will be of no comfort to those that have destroyed, and enslaved in the name of the Law, and in the name of Justice.

For their destruction will be sought, so that "Justice is Served"

For it is much better for all the people of this nation, if death falls to those that use the Law to kill, hurt, steal, and frighten. Rather than for this to be the fate of those that resist such evil being done in the name of the Law
**********************************************************************************************************

BELOW ARE SOME OF THE FABRICATED CASE HEARING COURT RECORDS .

MANUFACTURED BY SOMEONE WITHIN THE VENTURA SUPERIOR COURT.

SOMEONE WHO HAS ACCESS TO THE COURT'S MAIN DATA BASE AND CAN "ALTER" EXISTING RECORDS.

THESE PARTICULAR FALSE RECORDS WERE TO HIDE THE FACT THAT FROM MY FINDING OF INCOMPETENCE ON AUGUST 8, 2003, UNTIL MY; "REMAND TO CUSTODY - HOLD FOR TRANSFER TO PATTON STATE HOSPITAL FOR TREATMENT AND EVALUATION" ON OCTOBER 28, 2003.;

I WAS O.R.'d, AND ON THE STREET.

BACK IN COURT EVERY TWO WEEKS.

SO THAT JUDGE CLONINGER, AND MY "ALLEGED" COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL, RANDY TUCKER COULD CONTINUE IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO GET ME TO SIGN A FORM THAT STATED;
"I HAVE MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND I AM ASKING THE COUNTY OF VENTURA MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT TO HELP ME WITH THESE MENTAL PROBLEMS"

WITH A FINDING OF MENTAL INCAPACITATION SO SEVERE THAT I WAS "FOUND" TO BE INCOMPETENT. THE LAW MANDATES THAT I AM TO BE IMMEDIATELY REMANDED TO CUSTODY, FOR MY OWN SAFTEY, AS WELL AS THE PUBLICS.

WHEN LAWYERS, JOURNALISTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT TYPES WOULD ACCESS THE COURT'S MAIN RECORDS DATA BASE WITH SOMETHING LIKE LEXIS/LEGAL SOFTWARE, THEY WOULD SEE THIS FAKE CASE HEARING RECORD THAT SAID THAT I WAS IN COURT ON SEPT. 30, OCT. 14, AND OCT. 27, 2003, TO DEAL WITH A; "MISSING COMPLAINT."

I'M TELLING THEM TO LOOK AT THE DOCKET ENTRIES FOR THESE DATES BECAUSE THEY WILL SHOW THAT I AM ON THE STREET OVER TWO MONTHS PAST THE DATE THAT THE COURT HAD FOUND ME TO BE INCOMPETENT.

THE REAL CASE HEARING DOCUMENTS FOR THESE DATES SHOW THAT I WAS REPEATEDLY BACK IN COURT FOR "COMPETENCY HEARING".

THE SAME RECORDS THEN STATE THAT; "YOUR RELEASE ON YOUR OWN RECOGNIZANCE CONTINUES"

WHEN THESE LAWYERS, JOURNALISTS ETC. CHECKED AND THE DOCKET ENTRIES DIDN'T REFLECT WHAT I HAD STATED TO THEM THAT THEY WOULD, THEY CAME TO THE CONCLUSION THAT I WAS EITHER LYING, OR DELUSIONAL.

THEY WOULD LOOK NO FURTHER.

THEY WOULDN'T RETURN MY CALLS.

THEY HAD ENTERED INTO THEIR RESPECTIVE DATA BASES, A NOTICE THAT WOULD POP UP WHEN EVER MY NAME WAS TYPED INTO THEIR DATA BASE.

SOMETHING TO THE EFFECT OF; "FALSE CLAIM. WASTE NO TIME."
*************************************************************************************************
Docket Information

This Case has 49 Docket Entries.
2003030331 Glen Wilson Case Number Name Offense Level Court Location Agency Code
2003030331 Glen Wilson F V OXPD
Citation Number Case Status Mandatory Appear Violation Date Appearance Date
DSCH N 01011900
Create Warrant Date Disposition Date Last Sentence Date AR Balance
10272003 0.00
**************************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
09162003 1 Case calendared to 09/16/03 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11forMC MC.
09162003 2 Upon conviction assess CJAF fee of $120.00.
09162003 3 Reappearance Request submitted by District Attorney.
09162003 4 Booking charges are: 11377(a) HS
09162003 5 Missing Complaint Heard in Courtroom 11 on Sep 16, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
09162003 6 Judge Cloninger , James P.
09162003 7 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09162003 8 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
09162003 9 The defendant is present in court.
09162003 10 Deputy District AttorneyMcGrewpresent.
09162003 11 No complaint having been filed, the defendant is discharged on this case. Please note that the District Attorney may file a complaint at a later date using this same case number, pursuant to statute of limitations.
09162003 12 Case continued to09/30/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forMissing Complaint Continued.
09162003 13 The court orders you to appear.
09162003 14
09162003 15 Defendant is ordered discharged from custody on this case.
09162003 16 File located to Ventura Records.
09162003 17 Signature Required
09302003 1 Missing Complaint Continued Heard in Courtroom 11 on Sep 30, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
09302003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
09302003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09302003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
09302003 5 The defendant is present in court.
09302003 6 Deputy District AttorneyRidleypresent.
09302003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
09302003 8 Case continued to10/14/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forMissing Complaint Continued.
09302003 9 The court orders you to appear.
09302003 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09302003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
10142003 1 Missing Complaint Continued Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 14, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10142003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10142003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
10142003 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
10142003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10142003 8 Case continued to10/27/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forMissing Complaint Continued.
10142003 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
10142003 10 The court orders you to appear.
10142003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
10272003 1 Missing Complaint Continued Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 27, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10272003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10272003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10272003 4 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
10272003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10272003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10272003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10272003 8 No complaint having been filed, the defendant is discharged on this case. Please note that the District Attorney may file a complaint at a later date using this same case number, pursuant to statute of limitations.
10272003 9 File located to Ventura Records.
12272004 1 Case Closed.
*************************************************************************
NOTICE ALL OF THE "DIFFERENT" CASE HEARING DOCKET SHEETS THAT START ON DIFFERENT LINES.

ALSO IF YOU LOOK, YOU WILL BE SURPRISED TO SEE HOW MAN LINE NUMBER STATEMENTS ON ONE DAY, ON ONE DOCKET SHEET IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS STATED ON ANOTHER DOCKET SHEET FOR THE SAME DATE AND LINE.
**************************************************************************
10142003 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
10142003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10142003 8 Case continued to10/27/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
10142003 9 The court orders you to appear.
10142003 10 File located to Ventura Records.
10272003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 27, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10272003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10272003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10272003 4 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
10272003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10272003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10272003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10272003 8 Defense witness Marla Beimforde is sworn and testifies.
10272003 9 Defendant is sworn and testifies.
10272003 10 Argument by the Defense.
10272003 11 Argument by the People.
10272003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368PC.
10272003 13 Placement:PattonState Hospital.
10272003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10272003 15 Case continued to10/28/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forRemand.
10272003 16 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
10272003 17 The court orders you to appear.
10272003 18 File located to courtroom #11.
10282003 1 Remand Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 28, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10282003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10282003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10282003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10282003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10282003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10282003 7 Case continued to10/29/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forProbation to Determine Credit for Time Served.
10282003 8 Defendant remanded on Mental Health Commitment to Patton State Hospital.
10282003 9 File located to courtroom #11.
10292003 1 Probation to Determine Credit for Time Served Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 29, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10292003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10292003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10292003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10292003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10292003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10292003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10292003 8 Imposition of sentence suspended pending return from Patton State Hospital on felony matters
*******************************************************************************
Docket Information

This Case has 1212 Docket Entries.
2001044311 Glen Wilson Case Number Name Offense Level Court Location Agency Code
2001044311 Glen Wilson F V OXPD
Citation Number Case Status Mandatory Appear Violation Date Appearance Date
CTCN Y 12272001
Create Warrant Date Disposition Date Last Sentence Date AR Balance
09222004 05242005 2749.00
*********************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
10142003 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
10142003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10142003 8 Case continued to10/27/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
10142003 9 The court orders you to appear.
10142003 10 File located to Ventura Records.
10272003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 27, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10272003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10272003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10272003 4 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
10272003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10272003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10272003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10272003 8 Defense witness Marla Beimforde is sworn and testifies.
10272003 9 Defendant is sworn and testifies.
10272003 10 Argument by the Defense.
10272003 11 Argument by the People.
10272003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368PC.
10272003 13 Placement:PattonState Hospital.
10272003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10272003 15 Case continued to10/28/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forRemand.
10272003 16 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
10272003 17 The court orders you to appear.
10272003 18 File located to courtroom #11.
10282003 1 Remand Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 28, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10282003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10282003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10282003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10282003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10282003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10282003 7 Case continued to10/29/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forProbation to Determine Credit for Time Served.
10282003 8 Defendant remanded on Mental Health Commitment to Patton State Hospital.
10282003 9 File located to courtroom #11.
10292003 1 Probation to Determine Credit for Time Served Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 29, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10292003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10292003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10292003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10292003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10292003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10292003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10292003 8 Having found the defendant to be incompetent, the court now makes the following determination:
10292003 9 The court finds the maximum time for which defendant may be committed is6Year(s).
10292003 10 Credit of Actual -0days, 4019(b) PC -0days, State Institution-0days, for a total of0days.
10292003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368 PC.
10292003 13 Placement:Patton State HospitalState Hospital.
10292003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10292003 15 Sheriff ordered to transport the defendant to Patton State Hospital forthwith.
11032003 1 Packet sent 11/3/03
11032003 2 File located to Ventura Records.
****************************************************************************
You will note that the court has the "finding of incompetence on August 8,th 2003. Yet I am not remanded to custody until October, 28th, 2003.

A finding of incompetence is a finding of mental illness so severe that the court orders that a person that incapacitated must be remansded to custody, for his saftey and societies saftey.

Read the court entry on 8-8-2003 line; 08082003 11 The court finds the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, understand proceedings or cooperate with counsel; pursuant to the provisions of Section 1368 of the Penal Code.


This is the definition of a gibbering idiot. To think that someone would not ever exhibit any evidence of such mental incapacitation until the day, hour and minute that he attempts to bring true charges of misconduct against the prosecution is ridiculous way beyond my ability to adequately express.
**********************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
09092003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09092003 4 Court Reporter -Ignacio , Susanis present.
09092003 5 The defendant is present in court.
09092003 6 Deputy District AttorneyMcGrewpresent.
09092003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
09092003 8 Case continued to09/30/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
09092003 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09092003 10 The court orders you to appear.
09092003 11 File located to Ventura Records.
09302003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Sep 30, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
09302003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
09302003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
09302003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
09302003 5 The defendant is present in court.
09302003 6 Deputy District AttorneyRidleypresent.
09302003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
09302003 8 Case continued to10/14/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
09302003 9 The court orders you to appear.
09302003 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09302003 11 Defendant ordered to contact Marla Beimforde at 505 Poli Street in Ventura, 652-7592
09302003 12 File located to Ventura Records.
10142003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 14, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10142003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10142003 3 Judicial Assistant - Martin , Roberta A.
10142003 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
10142003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10142003 8 Case continued to10/27/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
10142003 9 The court orders you to appear.
10142003 10 File located to Ventura Records.
10272003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 27, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10272003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10272003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10272003 4 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
10272003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10272003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10272003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10272003 8 Defense witness Marla Beimforde is sworn and testifies.
10272003 9 Defendant is sworn and testifies.
10272003 10 Argument by the Defense.
10272003 11 Argument by the People.
10272003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368PC.
10272003 13 Placement:PattonState Hospital.
10272003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10272003 15 Case continued to10/28/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forRemand.
10272003 16 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
10272003 17 The court orders you to appear.
10272003 18 File located to courtroom #11.
10282003 1 Remand Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 28, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
*************************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
10142003 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
10142003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10142003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10142003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10142003 8 Case continued to10/27/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
10142003 9 The court orders you to appear.
10142003 10 File located to Ventura Records.
10272003 1 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 27, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10272003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10272003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10272003 4 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
10272003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10272003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10272003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10272003 8 Defense witness Marla Beimforde is sworn and testifies.
10272003 9 Defendant is sworn and testifies.
10272003 10 Argument by the Defense.
10272003 11 Argument by the People.
10272003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368PC.
10272003 13 Placement:PattonState Hospital.
10272003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10272003 15 Case continued to10/28/03at03:00 PMinCourtroom 11forRemand.
10272003 16 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
10272003 17 The court orders you to appear.
10272003 18 File located to courtroom #11.
10282003 1 Remand Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 28, 2003 at 03:00 PM.
10282003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10282003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10282003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10282003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10282003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10282003 7 Case continued to10/29/03at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forProbation to Determine Credit for Time Served.
10282003 8 Defendant remanded on Mental Health Commitment to Patton State Hospital.
10282003 9 File located to courtroom #11.
10292003 1 Probation to Determine Credit for Time Served Heard in Courtroom 11 on Oct 29, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
10292003 2 Judge Cloninger , James P.
10292003 3 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
10292003 4 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
10292003 5 The defendant is present in court.
10292003 6 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
10292003 7 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
10292003 8 Having found the defendant to be incompetent, the court now makes the following determination:
10292003 9 The court finds the maximum time for which defendant may be committed is6Year(s).
10292003 10 Credit of Actual -0days, 4019(b) PC -0days, State Institution-0days, for a total of0days.
10292003 12 Defendant is committed to Department of Health pursuant to1368 PC.
10292003 13 Placement:Patton State HospitalState Hospital.
10292003 14 A progress report is requested within90days, and bi-annually thereafter.
10292003 15 Sheriff ordered to transport the defendant to Patton State Hospital forthwith.
10292003 16 Case 2003013113 needs to be addressed when defendant returns from CDC.
11032003 1 Packet sent 11/3/03
**************************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
11032003 2 File located to Ventura Records.
11212003 1 Case calendared to 11/21/03 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11forSENTENCE MOD.
11212003 2 Case on calendar at request of pd office Sherry
11212003 3 Transportation to Patton.
11212003 4 Sentence Modification Heard in Courtroom 11 on Nov 21, 2003 at 01:30 PM.
11212003 5 Judge Cloninger , James P.
11212003 6 Judicial Assistant - Pulido , Rosie.
11212003 7 Court Reporter -Haering , Lucretia Ais present.
11212003 8 The defendant is not present in court.
11212003 9 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
11212003 10 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
11212003 11 Defense request re:order regarding medicationisgrantedby the Court.
11212003 12 The court ordersPatton State Hospital to notify the Public Defender prior to medicating the defendant wihtout his permission.
11212003 13 File located to courtroom #11.
02032004 1 Fax copy of Certificate of mental competence 1372PC from Patton State Hospital filed on 02/03/04.
02032004 2 Case calendared to 02/06/04 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 11forCompetency Hearing.
02042004 1 Minute order rec'd by P Marotto, badge #3987
02042004 2 Fax copy of Certification of mental competence 1372PC, signed minute order, and proof of servicesent to Records to be attached to file.
02062004 1 Case is transferred from02/06/04at09:00 AMinCourtroom 11to HEARING COMP toCourtroom 11on2/6/2004at01:30 PM.
02062004 2 Competency Hearing Heard in Courtroom 11 on Feb 06, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
02062004 3 Judge Purnell , Roland N.
02062004 4 Judicial Assistant - Barretto , Kristin.
02062004 5 Court Reporter -Haering , Lucretia Ais present.
02062004 6 The defendant is present in court.
02062004 7 Deputy District AttorneyConnorspresent.
02062004 8 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
02062004 9 The court finds the defendant is competent to stand trial, understands court proceedings and is able to cooperate with counsel.
02062004 10 Civil proceedings are ordered suspended and criminal proceedings are reinstated.
02062004 11 Case continued to02/27/04at01:30 PMinCourtroom 12forPre-Trial Conference.
02062004 12
02062004 13 The court orders you to appear.
02062004 14 Signature Required
02062004 15 Defendant is ordered discharged from custody on this case.
02062004 16 File located to Ventura Records.
02272004 1 Pre-Trial Conference Heard in Courtroom 12 on Feb 27, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
02272004 2 Judge Clark , Bruce A.
02272004 3 Judicial Assistant - Wortman , Jody L.
02272004 4 Court Reporter -Rogers , Tanyais present.
02272004 5 The defendant is present in court.
02272004 6 Public DefenderTuckeris present in court.
02272004 7 Deputy District AttorneyTaylorpresent.
02272004 8 Deputy Public DefenderTucker , Randyis relieved as attorney of record.
02272004 9 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
02272004 10 TheAttorney Waiverordered filed in court.
02272004 11 The Pre-trial conference is not held.
02272004 12 Time waived to03/29/04plus 30 days.
02272004 13 Case continued to03/29/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
02272004 14 The court orders you to appear.
02272004 15 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
02272004 16 File located to Ventura Records.
***************************************************************************
SEVEN AND A HALF MONTHS LATER;
On Febuary, 27th,2004, With my competency restored, at my 60 day evaluation by my "mental health assessment team" at Patton
(I have been told that this is about as soon as you can have a finding of incompetency overturned)

The eight months total is the result of the fact that it was almost 3 months after they secured the finding of incompetency, before they implemented it.

Using the time in an effort to attempt to coerce me into signing a mental health form that said; "I have mental health problems, and I am asking the Ventura Co. Mental Health Dept. to assist me with them."

Telling me that if I would "Zine zee paper old man!" They would "arrange" for me to be treated as an outpatient for my incompetency. (yeah right.) My response was; "No! No! I vill not zine zee paper." (with apologies to Cheech, and Chong)

I never did "sign the paper." So on Oct., 27th, 2003. Three months after the law mandated that I be remanded to custody, and sent to Patton, I was at last remanded.

Then I spent nearly a month in the County Jail, "just because." then 75 days total at Patton. As I had a two week wait after my competency was reinstated before I was transported.

THEN ALMOST ANOTHER MONTH BEFORE I COULD RID MYSELF OF MY CHEESY WEASAL "LAWYER FROM HELL."

It adds up to 7 plus months of derailed justice.

On top of 19 months of such illegal shennannigans which preceded it.

That's two years, and two months of;

The illusion of due process.
The illusion of equal protection.
The illusion of counsel.
The illusion of an adequate defense.
The illusion of speedy trial.
The illusion of probable cause.
The illusion of trial by jury.
The illusion of the rule of law.
The illusion of face my accusers.
The illusion of liberty.
The illusion of Justice.
The illusion of the right to present evidence.
The illusion of the right to appeal.
The illusion of being free of unwarranted searches, and seizures.

ILLUSION. ILLUSION. ILLUSION.

THAT'S ALL YOU GET.

AND THAT'S ONLY WHEN THEY THINK SOME ONE MIGHT BE LOOKING.

I still have seven more months of Law's abort to contend with. Which gives us a grand total of two years, and nine months, that the rule of law, and my civil liberties protections were absent from this process.

SIXTH START OF TRIAL March, 29th, 2004.
The next court date that jury trial is set to start. (but doesn't)
DERAILED;
By prosecution failing to enter the court room. New jury trial date set for, April, 15th, 2004.

At five minutes to nine a.m. on the morning of March, 29th, 2004, I saw senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, just outside the door of the court room. She never entered.

When I walked past her, she seemed rattled to see me back so soon. I was grinning, polite, and ready to get this dog and pony show on the road.

I really should have known better. So, trial was set for two weeks down the road.

I was hoping that their "bag of procedural tricks, traps, and deciets was running out of things to throw my way.

But as you will see, it was a really big bag!

SEVENTH START OF TRIALApril, 15th, 2004. start of jury trial is DERAILED.

By prosecution's procedural poor boy routine. Next trial date set for
June, 2nd, 2004.

I get to court and look around, but don't see d.d.atty. Taylor in the room.

I'm wondering if she's going to pull the same stunt as two weeks ago?

Instead, when my name is called, up walks this senior d.d.atty., named Eric Bond. He tells the court that he has; just inherited this case, your honor. This very day. I need at least 6 weeks, to come up to speed.

The judge says; Trial is now set for June, 2nd, 2004.

It was at this moment, with another 6 weeks before we're back here again, that I ask the judge for a conflict defense attorney. Which he granted.

I had heard from some people that they were better, and more independent, that the in house p.d.'s. I figured that I should try and get some sort of effective counsel, if possible. It wasn't.

My new court appointed counsel's name was John MacNamara.
***********************************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
03292004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Mar 29, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
03292004 2 Judge Riley , Ken W.
03292004 3 Judicial Assistant - Nunez , Patricia A.
03292004 4 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
03292004 5 Deputy District AttorneyInmanpresent.
03292004 6 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
03292004 7 Defense request re:fee waiver on all copies request from clerks officeisgrantedby the Court.
03292004 8 Time waived to04/15/04plus 30 days.
03292004 9 Case continued to04/15/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
03292004 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
03292004 11 File located to Ventura Records.
04152004 1 Case is transferred from04/15/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14to JURYTRIAL JT toCourtroom 14on4/15/2004at01:30 PM.
04152004 2 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Apr 15, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
04152004 3 Judge Riley , Ken W.
04152004 4 Judicial Assistant - Hernandez , Cecilia I.
04152004 5 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
04152004 6 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
04152004 7 Court Reporter -Cabral , Stephanie Ris present.
04152004 8 People's request re:to appoint an attorney for the defendantisgrantedby the Court.
04152004 9 Conflict Defense Attorney is appointed. You are to pay a $25.00 registration fee for representation by counsel pursuant to 987.5 PC. This is to be paid forthwith to the Ventura County Superior Court's Collection Unit, Room 205.
04152004 10 Conflict Defense Attorney Steinfeld is present.
04152004 11 Defenserequest for continuance is granted.
04152004 12 Case continued to06/02/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
04152004 13 Time waived to06/02/04plus 30 days.
04152004 14 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
04152004 15 File located to Ventura Records.
04152004 16 Estabished: Miscellaneous Account letter sent.
06022004 1 Case is transferred from06/02/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14to JURYTRIAL JT toCourtroom 14on6/2/2004at01:30 PM.
06022004 2 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Jun 02, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
06022004 3 Judge Gutierrez , Arturo F.
06022004 4 Judicial Assistant - Nunez , Patricia A.
06022004 5 Court Reporter -De La O , Kathleenis present.
06022004 6 The defendant is present in court.
06022004 7 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
06022004 8 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
06022004 9 People's motion toto consolidate 2003015911 with this caseisgranted.
06022004 10 Case2003015911is consolidated into this case.
06022004 11 Motion to fileInformationisgranted.
06022004 12 Defendant waives arraignment on Amended Information.
06022004 13 A plea of not guilty is entered as to all counts.
06022004 14 Defendant denies any and all priors and special allegations associated to this case.
06022004 16 Case continued to06/04/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
06022004 17 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
06022004 18 File located to courtroom #14.
06032004 1 Motionfor leave to file amended/consolidated informationfiled.
06032004 2 Motionsent to Judicial Assistant Division to be attached to the file.
06032004 3 Information Amendment 1 filed on 6/3/2004 00:00:00 by VCDA.
06032004 4 Felony charge 11377(a) HS filed as count 1 with violation date of 12/27/01 00:00:00.
06032004 5 Misdemeanor charge 11550(a) HS filed as count 2 with violation date of 12/27/01 00:00:00.
06032004 6 Felony charge 11377(a) HS filed as count 3 with violation date of 05/15/03 00:00:00.
**************************************************************************
EIGHTH START OF TRIAL June, 2nd, 2004.
Trial derailed by conflict defense atty. avoiding me like the plague for six weeks.

I called several times. I went to his office several times. He wasn't to be found. Next start of trial date; June, 4th, 2004.

I finally met him on June, 2nd, 2004. On my eighth start of trial date and he was a cookie cutter clone of the other two that had been inflicted on me.

No defense. No interviewing of my witnesses. No attempt to remove the two second strike attachments, that were the legal equivalent of a high caliber gun to my head. With the mandatory sentence of 25 to life if convicted on both counts.

Also, there was no way that he was going to press the two misconduct allegations against the prosecution.

He flat out said; "You can just forget about that. It's not going to happen."

It was back to; "Take the deal" which continued to be probation; or face 25 to life if I went to trial, and lost.

I reminded him that it wasn't just the actions that someone commits, that can get them in serious trouble. It can result just as easily from the absence of actions that one could reasonably expect some one to undertake as defense counsel but don't.

His response was an irritated scowl, and a sparsly worded; "You know, they can just kill you."

My response was; "Yeah, I'm sure they could. And I'm sure that they could have it done in such a way, as to not come back on them."

Then I gave my alleged counsel, Mr. MacNamara, a 50 plus page copy of my; Department of Justice, Office of the Inspector General, "complaint information of Civil Liberties violations by a DOJ employee." (FBI agent Templin) That I had filed with the Department of Justice in May, 2004.

That listed all the things that the Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court did, but never knew that I had discovered and could prove by way of the court's own records. All the evidentiary tracks that they left in the record that could, and would come back and bite them in the ass, if they ever were scrutinized, by " Real servants of the Law."

I went on with; "I'll just have to be satisfied with the 60 to 80 years in a federal prison, that each of the most serious offenders here in this court will be facing, and in large part recieving, if that happens, because as you can see, here,
and all through here."

As I start showing him damning little gems, here and there. As I list the federal crimes committed. The names and the dates of those involved. and where in the evidentiary record, the court record verifiable proof of their involvements is to be found.

Also showing him where I had voiced my fears of this happening (my murder) in several of my complaint additions to the DOJ-OIG.

Then I followed through with; "This will bring down enough of you, to squeeze one of your crew for the rest."

Finishing off with a little bit of bravado, that I hoped would convince him of my committment.

I told him; "It would be kind of fitting, if doing that, (killing me) shut your little illegal sandbox down. That would make you people the agents of your own destruction, by bringing all the attention necessary upon this court's personel that are involved in such things."

Then I said; "I'll pay that price, if you'll roll them dice."

I was hoping with all my heart that I sounded much more willing to pay that price than I felt.

But no matter how I felt. I had made my peace with who I was, what these individuals were, and what I had to do, long before this moment.

I could not let them pass, and consider myself as having any worth as a man.

I could not remain silent about the corruption of this court and see myself as having any worth as a member of my community.

Any worth at all, as a person, that for what ever reason, the obligation to see this through had fallen to.

Until I could hand the pursuit of justice, as concerns this matter over to more capable, and willing hands, the Law had fallen to me to uphold. As best I could. No matter what.

It shouldn't have fallen this far down. To where people like me reside, and dance at times right up against that line that we shouldn't cross. But there it was. I wasn't about to let it fall any further.

I'm sure that these boys were seriously thinking along these lines. (killing me) There was just too much federal time, waiting in the wings, going to way too many people. People that would do anything to anyone, to avoid facing a lot less severe consequences.

I have detailed in another section of this truthful statement of facts, why I believe that they may have already made one attempt, after my release from
Patton.

Killing the wrong individual.

It was shortly after this death by gunshots (five of them) at my place of employment. On my first day off. I have gone to work, at that liquor store, in the shopping center that all this revolves around, 5 days a week, from the shooting, till trials end. I can't even begin to describe to you what that was like.


NINTH START OF TRIAL: JUNE, 4TH, 2004.
Trial derailed by my alleged court appointed counsel, John MacNamara's request for continuence. Trial now set for, July, 7th, 2004.

With out discussion with me, my alleged counsel just asks for another month.

NOTE: If you are wondering how this can be done, remember that I have given over to my counsel, as does everyone who takes legal representation, my right to speak in my defense.

This handing over of this right, in my instance, was strictly enforced. Whenever I attempted to circumvent this stricture by speaking directly to the judge, I was admonished, (usually with a grin) and told to submit whatever questions that I wanted the court to address to my counsel, who would seek the courts response for me. (Yeah right In a perfect world.)

The previous day; June, 3rd, 2004, the prosecution formally added the 2nd, second strike allegation to my charges. They served this ammended information with what passes for a smile with such people.

They even included a; penalty breakdown sheet , so that I wouldn't be confused as to what I was mandatorily facing if convicted on both charges with strike attachments.

I knew that this was for the most part; High Theatre on the prosecutions part.

They wanted me to take this penalty sheet home, and over the next month, pull it out several times a day until it fell apart in my hands.

Figuring that probation would be looking mighty sweet to me, when I returned in a month.

I threw it in the trash, by the bailliff's desk just before I left.

I can play to the crowd too, when I have to.

Out in the hall, I saw my conflicted, I mean, conflict defense Atty. MacNamara.

Knowing him to be a reliable conduit to the other side, by the reactions I was seeing on these people's faces, to the Dept. of Justice complaint that I had given him last month. I figured that now was a good time to rattle their cage, some more. Like they had just done to mine.

I did this by giving him a rhyme story I had written, about this cut-throat crew that he was a full fledged member of, which I knew would piss him, and then later, them off, but might up their anxiety level a bit at the same time.

I wanted both reactions, as I figured they should do some worrying over the next month as well.

I had titled it; Those desperados of yore.

In the preface, I had stated that this was dedicated to all the Wile E. Coyotes in the world that kept running afoul of their own poorly thought out, yet elaborate schemes to make someone their victim. Long after it should have become apparent to them that they just were not up to the task.

This seemed an apt description of this crew then, and my belief that this was true has only been reinforced with time.

As I handed my alleged; "conflict is such a relative thing" defense attorney, John MacNamara, the paper, I recited it from memory, as I wanted the message to have a certain flow.

I was playing to a tough crowd, so I felt that I had to show boat a little, so that they would think that I was unconcerned. (yeah right)

THOSE DESPERADOS OF YORE

I know where you're going.
Because I've seen where you've been.
But you boys just keep rolling,
like you're close to a win.

Thinking; Check-mate in three moves
Set. Match. And Game
Then, somebody shoots off his toes
with his misguided aim.

There once was a gang they said;
Couldn't shoot straight.
They couldn't sing, couldn't dance,
fish, or cut bait.

That's you boys, yessiree
Those desperados of yore.
Look Another one just blew off his foot
Then he fell to the floor.

I watched my alleged counsel, MacNamara read this, while I recited it.

While he did, his jaw tightened. When he looked up, I made sure that my grin was ear to ear, and that my eyes were locked on his.

I wanted him to think that I had some high cards, in my hand that he didn't know about. I sure wish that had been so, but irregardless, I had to start acting like it was true none the less.

I thought my little rhyme endeavor exuded an air of bemused unconcern, at their attempts to finalize their goal of negating me as a threat to their illegal operations. It was all bluff. But I think it helped. Because I could see it working its way up under his skin.

My hope was that they would pass this paper around for the next month, until it fell apart in their hands.

TENTH START OF TRIAL. JULY, 7th, 2004.
Derailed by judge Riley. (just because) There is no request for delay listed by any one. Next start of trial date set for August, 4th, 2004.

The prosecution pulled out another; ammendment to charges , to consolidate case#2003015911 with case# 2001044311. Then judge Riley sets the August, 4th, date. He was acting like; worry in a hurry.

ELEVENTH START OF TRIAL August, 4th, 2004.
Trial derailed by judge Riley again. (just because he can)
Trial date set for August, 31st, 2004.

I remarked that judge Riley was acting a little; high strung on the preceding start of trial date; (that didn't) He was several degrees south of that on this date. Here is pretty much word for word my exchange on this day with judge Riley, when he called my name.

As soon as I made it to the lectern with my alleged advocate; John, "You know that they can just kill you" MacNamara, Judge Riley musters up a growling fearsome; "So you want to play with the big boys." look, and barks at me; "Well, Mr. Wilson, You had best be ready for the start of your trial."

Then; "ARE YOU READY MISTER WILSON?"

I had no trouble grinning, or answering. I responded just as firmly; "I'VE BEEN READY!"

Where upon judge Riley says; "Well, that's it then!" Then he slams his hand down hard on his bench and ends with; "Trial is set for August, 31st, 2004." And he was gone!

At each and every case hearing, my "conflict avoidance advocate" Atty. MacNamara, would endeavor to sell the deal. Which has always been probation.

If I would; swear, and sign, under penalty of perjury that; Day was night. Truth was Lie. Right was wrong. And that everything that was crooked and criminal, was in fact; Straight, fair, honest, and on the up and up.

But the poor guys heart wasn't in it by this time. He knew, they all knew, that I wasn't going to take the deal.

I had told my attorney about this time that I was going to weld them, (the prosecution) from head to toe, to these strike allegations they had attached. I thought at this time that they were really going to push the 25 to life sentence, if I wouldn't supply them with the shield and cover of a false admission of guilt.

If that were the case, I was going to have to battle on from within the prison system. Not an idea that was real appealing to me, but I felt that if I didn't suffer a tragic demise shortly after entering the system, I might be able to get someone to realize that this was way beyond the normal sentencing range.

When my conflict "What conflict?" atty. MacNamara realized that I was looking ahead to how I would carry the fight from inside prison, he lost his drive.

Up until now, my counsel, (who wouldn't counsel) had some faith that I would cave in, at some point. That was going fast. He didn't look well, and probably wasn't.

I almost felt bad about using him as a conduit again for another of my poetic takes on this crazy situation that I found myself in, but it was time to ramp it up some more, if I could. So I handed him a rhyme story I had written years ago, and modified to fit the current situation. It was called Desperate ground.

I had described it just above the poem, as an analogy of present day problems, set in the California gold rush era, telling the story of someone who had perservered against great odds, to find what was precious to him.

But between him, and town, where his treasure would be safe, there were five bush whackers that were determined to take his life, and his gold.

So that atty. MacNamara wouldn't miss the point, I added in the preface that the Gold was a metaphor to describe anything that was regarded as being so precious to you, that you would resist its theft with your all.

Precious things like your freedom. Or the truth.

I know that this one shook him up. Because when I handed it to him, I recited it, with feeling from memory, as he followed along by reading from the paper.

DESPERATE GROUND

My trail led out of wilderness.
It was a goat path headed down.
For years, some how, I had stood the test
of mining desperate ground.

Now with rifle cradled like a child,
and pistols here, and there.
With eyes this world had not beguiled.
With a look that said; Fair's fair.

I was halfway down that mountain,
when several shots cut loose.
I reined my horse still, spun him round,
and gave him both my boots.

He clambered to the trails first bend
where with a spank to his flank while jumping.
On landing, I turned, and shot that first fool.
By God My levered carbine's something

They gave up on the ambush.
They turned their thoughts to sneaking.
Now, they'd try and work a flush.
This set my brain to thinking.
Once five to one.
Now four to gun.
For they're not through with me.
Then, one dashed
I shot.
He crashed
I'm just hunting three.

Then a nervous voice said; Toss your gold
We'll let it go at that
I dropped down, crawled, half-circled sound.
I kept my body flat.
I rose behind that nervous voice,
that now was sounding, ill at ease.
I told him; Bush whacker's pay is lead, not gold.
Just before my finger squeezed.

The other two?
They were of one mind.
I guess, they had enough.
I never saw their faces.
Lord, they rode them ponies rough.
I gentled out my mount.
I nudged him headed down.
That night, I fed him oats.
That night, I slept in town.

When I recited the line; "With a look that said; Fair's fair." He looked up for a second. Right into my eyes. I don't know exactly what he was thinking, but in a way I do a little.

He was the one that was assigned to put that threat into words, that he sent into my ears. To work its poison on my spirit, mind, and body. when he said back on June, 2nd, that; "You know they can just kill you."

I couched my words that speak of such things, in a story , that was an analogy , by way of metaphors, but its effect, I would say, might have been even more pronounced on atty. MacNamara, that his direct threat of such to me.

For my words to him was also a story of Justice.

Because Justice is the very spirit of Fair is Fair. It's equitable. Which is the very essence of what is Just. What I was reminding him of, that is as true as anything you care to offer as an example of Justice is this;

Justice is what it is. Not what we imagine it to be.

First you discover that the spirit of Justice; Can't be found within the ranks of local law enforcement.

Then you discover that the spirit of Justice; Isn't honored in the local courts.

Then you learn that the local federal officials, that are expected to be the people's shield and cover against such entrenched lawless predations; While aware of what is going on, and your plight, refuse to protect, and defend

Then you take overwhelming evidence of such, to those that have the helm at the national level of federal protection;
Only to discover that their is no servant of the law from one end of this land to the other, that is concerned with the administration of Justice.

This does not mean that there is no Justice.

It just means that Justice has been loosed upon the land.

And I will tell you right now. It is 1,000 times better for all, if the Spirit of Justice can be found within;
The temples of our Laws.
In the courtrooms within Law's temples.
And within the hearts of those that have sworn a sacred oath to protect and defend those laws.

Because of all crimes, you had best believe that she will exact the most horriffic payments of misery, and despair;
From those that destroy, harm, steal, and lie in the name of Justice.

You had best understand that she will exact this same price from those; That offer sanctuary to such creatures as well.

Justice will prevail.
Justice will be served.

I suggest stongly that we prepare a suitable place for her spirit, within this hall that bears her name in Ventura County.

Before she sets a date for the administration of justice, as regards those that provoke her wrath, that no man will delay.

For she will send those that are true agents of her authority. They can't be reasoned with.

For it is the Law that serves Justice.

When the Law doesn't serve Justice, it has lost its legitimacy, power, and protection.

Not the other way around.
*************************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
06032004 7 PC 667S2FP filed as Count 1 Special Allegation 1.
06032004 8 PC 667S2FP filed as Count 3 Special Allegation 1.
06042004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Jun 04, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
06042004 2 Judge Gutierrez , Arturo F.
06042004 3 Judicial Assistant - Nunez , Patricia A.
06042004 4 The defendant is present in court.
06042004 5 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
06042004 6 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
06042004 7 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
06042004 8 TheInformationis served.
06042004 9 Defendant waives arraignment on Amended Information.
06042004 10 Defenserequest for continuance is granted.
06042004 11 The last date for trial is 09/07/04.
06042004 12 Case continued to07/07/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
06042004 13 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
06042004 14 The court orders you to appear.
06042004 15 File located to Ventura Records.
07022004 1 Motionfor consolidation of casesfiled.
07022004 2 Second(Amended) Notice of Motion for Consolidation of Casessent to Judicial Assistant Division to be attached to the file.
07072004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Jul 07, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
07072004 2 Judge Riley , Ken W.
07072004 3 Judicial Assistant - Balam , Evelyn K.
07072004 4 The defendant is present in court.
07072004 5 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
07072004 6 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
07072004 7 Court Reporter -Strayer , Brian Mis present.
07072004 8 Motion to fileInformationisgranted.
07072004 9 Information Amendment 2 filed on 7/7/2004 00:00:00 by VCDA.
07072004 10 Felony charge 11377(a) HS filed as count 1 with violation date of 12/27/01 00:00:00.
07072004 11 Misdemeanor charge 11550(a) HS filed as count 2 with violation date of 12/27/01 00:00:00.
07072004 12 Felony charge 11377(a) HS filed as count 3 with violation date of 05/15/03 00:00:00.
07072004 13 Misdemeanor charge 11550(a) HS filed as count 4 with violation date of 04/20/03 00:00:00.
07072004 14 PC 667S2FP filed as Count 1 Special Allegation 1.
07072004 15 PC 667S2FP filed as Count 3 Special Allegation 1.
07072004 16 TheInformationis served.
07072004 17 Defendant waives arraignment on Amended Information.
07072004 18 Case2003013113is consolidated into this case.
07072004 19 Case continued to08/04/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
07072004 20 Time waived to08/04/04plus 45 days.
07072004 21 The court orders you to appear.
07072004 22 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
07072004 23 File located to Ventura Records.
08042004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Aug 04, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
08042004 2 Judge Riley , Ken W.
08042004 3 Judicial Assistant - Balam , Evelyn K.
08042004 4 The defendant is present in court.
08042004 5 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
08042004 6 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
08042004 7 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
08042004 8 Case continued to08/31/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
************************************************************************
TWELFTH START OF TRIAL August, 31st, 2004. Derailed.
By judge Curtis Next trial date set for September, 8th, 2004

This is where we come into the home stretch. It is now, 2 years, 8 months, from my arrest, and charge that is before the court.

My; conflict with fulfilling his oath sworn duty Attorney, MacNamara, every judge, the prosecutor (Bond) are all attempting to get me to waive, speedy trial which is set to run out on the 18th, of September. I won't do it.

So begins the legal endurance run to the finish line. Part of my trials of Job, legal equivalent of; Mister Toads Wild Ride.

From this point on, these court personnel, that have a death grip on the legal machinery of the law, have me in court; SIX TIMES IN THE NEXT 20 DAYS.

Five trial dates in the last 12 days.

The start of trial dates from here on out are rapid fire.

THIRTEENTH TRIAL DATE; September 8th, 2004. Derailed;

Then;
FOURTEENTH TRIAL DATE; September 10th, 2004. Derailed;

Then;
FIFTEENTH TRIAL DATE; September, 13th, 2004. Derailed;
********************************************************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
08042004 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
08042004 10 The court orders you to appear.
08042004 11 File located to Ventura Records.
08312004 1 Case is transferred from08/31/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14to JURYTRIAL JT toCourtroom 14on8/31/2004at01:30 PM.
08312004 2 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Aug 31, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
08312004 3 Judge Curtis , Herbert III.
08312004 4 Judicial Assistant - Hernandez , Cecilia I.
08312004 5 Court Reporter -Stone , Susan Eis present.
08312004 6 The defendant is present in court.
08312004 7 Deputy District AttorneyInmanpresent.
08312004 8 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
08312004 9 Courtrequest for continuance is granted.
08312004 10 Case continued to09/08/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
08312004 11 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
08312004 12 The court orders you to appear.
08312004 13 File located to Ventura Records.
09082004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Sep 08, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
09082004 2 Judge Curtis , Herbert III.
09082004 3 Judicial Assistant - Hernandez , Cecilia I.
09082004 4 The defendant is present in court.
09082004 5 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
09082004 6 Court Reporter -Cabral , Stephanie Ris present.
09082004 7 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
09082004 8 Case continued to09/10/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
09082004 9 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09082004 10 The court orders you to appear.
09082004 11 File located to courtroom #14.
09102004 1 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Sep 10, 2004 at 08:30 AM.
09102004 2 Judge Curtis , Herbert III.
09102004 3 Judicial Assistant - Bottorff , Rebecca C.
09102004 4 The defendant is present in court.
09102004 5 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
09102004 6 Court Reporter -Cabral , Stephanie Ris present.
09102004 7 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara is present.
09102004 8 170.6 filed Judge Cloninger.
09102004 9 Case continued to09/13/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
09102004 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09102004 11 The court orders you to appear.
09102004 12 File located to courtroom #14.
09132004 1 Case is transferred from09/13/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14to JURYTRIAL JT toCourtroom 14on9/13/2004at01:30 PM.
09132004 2 JURY TRIAL Heard in Courtroom 14 on Sep 13, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
09132004 3 Judge Riley , Ken W.
09132004 4 Judicial Assistant - Nunez , Patricia A.
09132004 5 The defendant is present in court.
09132004 6 Deputy District AttorneyBondpresent.
09132004 7 Court Reporter -Cressy , Rhondais present.
09132004 8 Conflict Defense Attorney McNamara not present is present.
09132004 9 Case continued to09/15/04at08:30 AMinCourtroom 14forJURY TRIAL.
09132004 10 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09132004 11 File located to courtroom #14.
*************************************************************************
SIXTEENTH TRIAL DATE; September 15th, 2004. Derailed;
That's four trial dates in one week. They knew that I was riding my bike from Oxnard, to the courtroom in Ventura, everyday, both ways. They would keep me in court from morning till court recesses for the day. Trying to get me to drop from exhaustion.

They would have my name removed from the court room listings, each time. And they had it removed from the Master sheet in the clerks office, on September, 13th, and Sept., 15th, in the hopes that I would leave early, and they could call my name, and I would be a no show; failure to appear which would allow for my being arrested.

Finally, on the 15th, of September, sensing that my conflicted as all get out; "Defense? We don't need no stinking defense " poster child for every bad lawyer joke that anyone has ever heard; defense attorney, John MacNamara was suffering from a bad case of; "I haven't filed one motion sickness." I pressed for his removal, and the re-institution of my pro per status.

With the prosecutions steely eyed defender of; truth, or a reasonable facsimile and seeker of; "Just Us." D.D. Atty. Eric Bond, endeavoring mightily to keep me muzzled.

Arguing tenaciously with the judge, that presided over this hearing, to not to allow me to go into court against his legal prowess, (that he had somehow managed to keep hidden) without the aid of counsel. (Counsel to aid his end run around the Law, and Constitution that is)

His prosecutorial prowess deserting him at this hearing, as my right to
speak in my own legal defense was reinstated.

Rather hastily, when the judge noted the looks of terror on both my former framer, defense arty. MacNamara's face, and that of d.d.atty Bond's as well, when I launched into a litany of strange doings by these officers of the court's abort, and others as well.

Realizing that she was about to lose her plausible deniability she quickly reinstated my pro per status, and ended the hearing into the matter. Tossing back over her shoulder, as she literally ran the chamber; "You can stop now, this hearing is concluded."

So here I am, with two business days in which to prepare a defense, (Thursday, and Friday, Sept., 16th, and 17th,) while the prosecution has had 2 years, and 9 plus months to do the same.

But that's OK. I had a defense stratagy that was sure to win, or at least pull most of the jury towards not guilty.

I should have realized that this was never going to be allowed to happen in this county's superior court.

Even though the last day that prosecution could go forward with trial was September, 18th, 2004. Because that date fell on a Saturday, the prosecution managed to eke out two extra days beyond their official cut off point, of the 18th, of Sept.

And Yes, my trial began on the very last day, (plus two) that the state could go forward with my prosecution.

The word of a street person, against two police officers, and the prosecution didn't want to go to trial.

No judge was of a mind to preside. Because they knew that this wasn't going to be pretty. And that there was no way to do, what they were obviously ordered to do, without leaving a ton of incriminating evidence in the court's record.

The only explanation as to why someone, in fact a whole group of someones would continue under such conditions is if they were ordered to do so by people that they feared much more than the Law, or prison.

BECAUSE LOOK AT HOW MANY OFFICERS OF THIS COURT HAD TO; DELIBERATELY LEAVE ALL KINDS OF INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE IN THE RECORD .

THESE ARE VERY INTELLIGENT INDIVIDUALS.

THEY WOULD NEVER RUN SUCH A RISK, AND LEAVE SUCH UNAMBIGUOUS EVIDENCE IN THE COURTS OWN RECORDS, UNLESS THEY HAD TO.

AND IF YOU THINK THAT THE TERROR FELT BY CORRUPT OFFICIALS , WHO JUST HAVE TO IMAGINE BEING CAUGHT AT SOMETHING LIKE THIS , THAT RESULTED IN DOING HARD TIME IN A FEDERAL PENITENTRY, ISN'T EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO OVERIDE WITH A GREATER FEAR, THEN YOU DON'T KNOW JUST HOW HELLISH AN EXISTENCE IT IS FOR JUDGES, AND PROSECUTORS WHO END UP IN THE FEDERAL PEN.

YOU CAN BET THAT THEY KNOW, AND FEAR THIS HAPPENING GREATLY. AND YET, THESE PEOPLE ARE TERRIFIED OF SOME GREATER CONSEQUENCE, THAN SPENDING THE REST OF THEIR LIVES IN A FEDERAL PRISON

Because each, and every one of these officers of the court, from d.d.atty. Taylor, back on April, 7th, 2003 till now, has had to leave blatantly, obvious illegal as all get out evidence in the record at every turn that could send them away for a long time.

There is nothing but a greater fear of the consequences that they will suffer if they don't do what must be done to.... WHAT?

To keep me from laying out the motive.

LET ME REPEAT THAT;

TO KEEP ME FROM LAYING OUT THE MOTIVE AS TO WHY AN OXNARD POLICE OFFICER WOULD DO SUCH A THING.

I'M NOBODY. THIS ISN'T ABOUT ME,

THIS IS ABOUT SOMETHING THAT I LEARNED.

THEY KNEW WHAT MY DEFENSE WAS GOING TO BE.

THEY KNEW WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY.

AND THE ONLY PEOPLE THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN AFFECTED BEYOND THIS POLICE OFFICER THAT PLANTED DRUGS ON ME WAS,,,? THE OWNERS OF TIGER REAL ESTATE FUND LP. (AND THEIR AGENTS.)

SO, WHAT ABOUT MOTIVE?

THIS IS THE ONE AREA OF EVIDENCE THAT CAN NOT BE RULED TO BE IRRELEVANT.

AND YET IT WAS. BY JUDGE COLEMAN. WHEN I ATTEMPTED TO PRESENT THE COURTS OWN RECORDS TO THE JURY.

I AM A SKING THE JURY TO BELIEVE A VERY DIFFICULT THING.
WHY WOULD A POLICE OFFICER DO SUCH THINGS TO ME?

I CAN NOT BE STOPPED FROM TELLING A JURY WHAT I BELIEVE IS THE REASON WHY THIS OFFICER DID SUCH A THING.

THAT'S MOTIVE.

BUT THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT JUDGE COLEMAN DID.

IT HAD BETTER BE GOOD. AS IN; LOGICAL, REASONABLE, AND VERY UNDERSTANDABLE.

YOU HAD BETTER HAVE A LOT MORE THAN JUST A STORY.

YOU HAD BETTER SHOW VERIFIABLE PROOF. AND SUPPORTING TESTIMONY IMPROVES YOUR CHANCES GREATLY.

I HAD BOTH.

I WASN'T ALOWED TO GO TO MOTIVE. BY SHOWING THE JURY THE COURT'S OWN RECORDS. THAT DETAIL, IN SEQUENTIAL ORDER ALL THAT HAD TRANSPIRED AT MY CASE HEARINGS, FROM CHARGES FILED, TILL TRIAL.

AND I COULDN'T PUT MY WITNESS ON THE STAND. TO TESTIFY ABOUT WHAT SHE HAD OBSERVED AT MY SHAM REMAND HEARING.

I COULD PUT ON ANY DEFENSE I WANTED, EXCEPT THE TRUTH.

FROM THE VERY BEGINNING, FROM MY ARREST ON, I ASSERTED THAT THIS OFFICER PLANTED THESE DRUGS ON ME.

AND I STATED THAT THIS WAS DONE TO PLEASE THE OWNERS OF TIGER REAL ESTATE FUND LP, WHO WERE THE INSTIGATORS OF THE OXNARD POLICE DEPT.'s FULL THROTTLE ATTACK AGAINST MY PERSON.

A DAY, AND NIGHT, ONSLAUGHT THAT WENT ON FOR ALMOST A MONTH BEFORE MY ARREST. AND BEFORE THAT PERIOD, IT HAD BEEN ESCALATING TO THE BOILING POINT FOR ALMOST THREE MONTHS.

ALL OF THESE UNWARRANTED, ILLEGAL ACTIONS BEGINNING WITHIN ONE MONTH OF MY TELLING A FEW INDIVIDUALS THAT I BELIEVED THAT THEIR BUSINESSES WERE BEING DELIBERATELY DESTROYED BY TIGER'S OWNERS.

SO THAT THEY COULD BRING DOWN THE STRUCTURE, AND DIG UP A LEAKING, CHEMICAL SOLVENT TANK BELOW THE DRYCLEANERS, THAT WAS LOCATED ON THEIR PROPERTY.

ALL OF THESE THINGS POINTING TOWARDS ONE FACT;

THAT ELEMENTS WITHIN OXNARD CITY GOVT. AND VENTURA COUNTY GOVT. WERE AIDING, AND ABETTING TIGER'S OWNERS IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO AVOID MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN LIABILITY, THAT THEY (TIGER'S OWNERS) WOULD HAVE TO PAY, FOR THE COST OF CLEAN UP, AND ANY DAMAGES TO PROPERTY, OR HEALTH.

JUDGE COLEMAN RULING THAT THE COURTS OWN RECORDS WERE NOT RELEVANT.

JUDGE COLEMAN RULING THAT SUPPORTING TESTIMONY OF MY ALLEGATIONS OF AN ILLEGAL, SHAM REMAND HEARING, BY ROSE MACIAS WAS NOT RELEVANT.

RULING THAT THE ACTIONS, AND INACTIONS OF;
Public defender; Dino Inumerable.
Public defender; Melanie Miles.
Judge; Riley.
Judge; Cloninger.
Senior deputy district attorney; Catharine Taylor.
Senior deputy district attorney; Eric Bond.
Public defender; Randy Tucker.
Conflict defense attorney; John MacNamara.
Some one; high up in the sherrifs dept.
Court certified psychologist; Patrick Barker.
Mental Health Director; Marla Biemforde.

Were in no way relevant to my claims from the beginning that there were;
Elements within Ventura County Govt., and Oxnard City Govt., that were aiding, and abetting the owners of Tiger Real Estate Fund LP. In their attempt to keep secret a massive, longterm, chemical solvent leak from an underground tank on one of their properties, that has contaminated the groundwater in west-Oxnard;

IN THE HOPES OF AVOIDING LIABILITY, FOR THE COST OF CLEAN-UP, AND ANY RESULTANT DAMAGES.

Judge Coleman was not about to let me show the jury; the courts own record
of events that were beyond egregious, and beyond any possibility of being
mis-interpreted by the jury.

Judge Coleman knew that if the jury saw this;

Court record evidence of 17 jury trial dates derailed by every one but me. Every judge, prosecutor, and court appointed counsel without my voiced permission.

Sequential crazy-quilt of mis-stated laws;

Mis-applied rulings;

Illegal strike attachments;

prosecution misconduct.

Do nothing defense counsels;

25 to life, or probation offer;

The timing of my coerced into taking counsels request for a competency
hearing.

And a finding of incompetency, with no history, no outbursts, no examples of disturbed mental behavior;

Not only would I have been found not guilty, but these people, that sat on
the jury, would have been making calls to people that may not be willing to
listen to me, but would be willing to listen to them.

You know, people in the media. People in federal enforcement.

There is no greater proof that there was , and is a massive number of
conspirators involved in the denial of my rights to due process, and equal
protection, than; Judge Coleman's denying a man at trial the ability to go
to motive.

For if you deny a man the right to show why a police officer would do such a
thing.

No one will believe that he did.
Truthful statements by; Glen Michael Wilson
*********************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
09202004 14 The Court stands in recess.
09202004 15 At10:16 AM:
09202004 16 Prospective jurors arrive in court.
09202004 17 All prospective jurors are present.
09202004 18 The court orders that the prospective jurors be sworn for cause
09202004 19 At10:20 AM:
09202004 20 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09202004 21 All prospective jurors are present.
09202004 22 The court advises the prospective jurors of the nature of the charges.
09202004 23 The Court grants hardship application of the following juror(s)1,7,17,19,35,36,38,41,42,44,48,53,54,55 and 56..
09202004 24 The court introduces the parties to prospective jurors.
09202004 25 The prospective jurors are seated in the jury box.
09202004 26 TheCourtcommence with Voir Dire.
09202004 27 Prospective juror(s)Candice Londonis excused for cause.
09202004 28 Prospective juror(s)Elizabeth Erbis excused for cause.
09202004 29 At11:35 AM:
09202004 30 The Court admonishes theProspective Juror(s)and directs a recess.
09202004 31 The court is in recess until 01:30 PM
09202004 32 At11:39 AM:
09202004 33 Proceedings outside the presence of the jury.
09202004 34 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09202004 35 Prospective juror #11 is present.
09202004 36 The court and counsel conduct an In-Camera Voir Dire of prospective juror(s)11 .
09202004 37 Prospective juror(s)Power Johnsonis excused for cause.
09202004 38 At11:44 AM:
09202004 39 The Court stands in recess.
09202004 40 At01:37 PM:
09202004 41 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09202004 42 All prospective jurors are present.
09202004 43 TheDefensecommence with Voir Dire.
09202004 44 ThePeoplecommence with Voir Dire.
09202004 45 Peremptory challenges commence.
09202004 46 Prospective juror(s)Andrew Brownis excused for cause.
09202004 48 ThePeople'schallenge for cause of prospective juror25is denied.
09202004 49 Prospective juror(s)John Robinsonis excused for cause.
09202004 50 Twelve jurors are selected to try the above entitled case.
09202004 51 The court orders the seating of1alternate juror(s).
09202004 52 The court and counsel proceed with the selection of1alternate juror(s).
09202004 53 1alternate juror(s) is/are selected to try the above entitled cause.
09202004 54 The jury is sworn to try the case.
09202004 55 Alternate juror(s) sworn to try the case.
09202004 56 The court reads selected jury instructions to the jury and alternate juror(s) as set forth on the record.
09202004 57 At03:04 PM:
09202004 58 The Court admonishes theJurorsand directs a recess.
09202004 59 The court stands in recess until 09/21/04 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 46 for Jury Trial in Progress.
09202004 60 At03:06 PM:
09202004 61 Proceedings outside the presence of the jury.
09202004 62 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09202004 63 At the request of counsel for the people, the Court orders that photographs be substituted for the drugs at the conclusion of the trial.
09202004 64 At03:17 PM:
***************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
09212004 48 People's witness Denise Lyons is sworn and testifies.
09212004 49 People rests.
09212004 50 Defendant is sworn and testifies.
09212004 51 Contested matter. The defendant / defense counsel presented evidence in court.
09212004 52 The exhibits are in the minutes by reference. A detailed list will be attached to the file.
09212004 53 Defendant's exhibit # A is marked for identification.
09212004 54 Defendant's exhibit # B is marked for identification.
09212004 55 Defendant's exhibit # C is marked for identification.
09212004 56 Defendant's exhibit # D is marked for identification.
09212004 57 Defendant's exhibit # E is marked for identification.
09212004 58 Defendant's exhibit # F is marked for identification.
09212004 59 Defendant's exhibit # G is marked for identification.
09212004 60 Defendant's exhibit # H is marked for identification.
09212004 61 Defendant's exhibit # I is marked for identification.
09212004 62 Defendant's exhibit # J is marked for identification.
09212004 63 Defendant's exhibit # K is marked for identification.
09212004 64 At02:50 PM:
09212004 65 The Court admonishes theJurorsand directs a recess.
09212004 66 The court is in recess until 03:10 PM
09212004 67 At02:51 PM:
09212004 68 Proceedings outside the presence of the jury.
09212004 69 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09212004 70 The Court finds that the testimony of Rose Macias is not relevant in this case and orders that she will not be allowed to testify.
09212004 71 At12:00 AM:
09212004 72 The Court stands in recess.
09212004 73 At03:17 PM:
09212004 74 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09212004 75 All members of the jury and alternate juror(s) are present.
09212004 76 Defensewitness,Glen Michael Wilson,resumes the witness stand.
09212004 77 At03:38 PM:
09212004 78 The Court admonishes theJurorsand directs a recess.
09212004 79 The court stands in recess until 09/22/04 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 46 for Jury Trial in Progress.
09212004 80 At03:39 PM:
09212004 81 The Court stands in recess.
09212004 82 At03:54 PM:
09212004 83 Proceedings outside the presence of the jury.
09212004 84 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09212004 85 People's motion todismiss 2nd strike allegationisgranted.
09212004 86 The667S2FP PCallegation, as to count1, is stricken.
09212004 87 The667S2FP PCallegation, as to count3, is stricken.
09212004 88 The court and counsel settle jury instructions.
09212004 89 At04:28 PM:
09212004 90 The Court stands in recess.
09212004 91 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09212004 92 The court orders you to appear.
09212004 93 Exhibits from hearing 09/21/04 09:00 AM held in Courtroom 46 has been moved to hearing 09/22/04 09:00 AM to be held in Courtroom 46.
09222004 1 Jury Trial in Progress Heard in Courtroom 46 on Sep 22, 2004 at 09:00 AM.
09222004 2 Judge Coleman , Donald D.
09222004 3 Judicial Assistant - Cassy , Christine E.
09222004 4 Jury Trial - Day 3
**************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
09222004 5 Court Reporter -Castaneda , Tina Mis present.
09222004 6 Deputy District AttorneyEric Bondpresent.
09222004 7 The defendant is present in court.
09222004 8 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
09222004 9 At09:08 AM:
09222004 10 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09222004 11 All members of the jury and alternate juror(s) are present.
09222004 12 The court proceeds to instruct the jury.
09222004 13 Argument by the People.
09222004 14 Argument by the Defense.
09222004 15 Final Argument by the People.
09222004 16 Final instructions to the jury and alternate juror.
09222004 17 Bailiff Duane LaMotte is sworn to take charge of the jury.
09222004 18 At09:59 AM:
09222004 19 The jurors retire to the jury room to deliberate.
09222004 20 The alternate juror(s) excused by the court, to remain on call.
09222004 21 The court accepts the stipulation that the bailiff may excuse the jurors for breaks, and if a verdict is not reached on this date, the bailiff may excuse the jurors for the evening recess without the necessity of returning to court.
09222004 22 At10:03 AM:
09222004 23 Proceedings outside the presence of the jury.
09222004 24 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09222004 25 People's Motion for Protective Orderfiled on09/22/04.
09222004 26 The Court orders the defendant to return to Mr. Bond "Bates" pages 00020-00054 by 10:00 a.m. on September 23, 2004.
09222004 27 The Court orders Mr. Bond to prepare an order for the Court.
09222004 28 Above documents are to remain in the DA's file in the event there is a re-trial in this case.
09222004 29 At10:11 AM:
09222004 30 The Court stands in recess.
09222004 31 At11:15 AM:
09222004 32 Court is in session. All parties are present.
09222004 33 All members of the jury and alternate juror(s) are present.
09222004 34 The jurors return to the courtroom with verdict.
09222004 35 Juror7is selected as foreperson of the jury.
09222004 36
09222004 37 The jurors are polled at the request of theCourt .
09222004 38 The Court orders the verdict(s) recorded.
09222004 39 Counsel waives re-reading of the verdict(s) as recorded.
09222004 40 The jurors are thanked and excused by the court.
09222004 41 The court's record of personal juror identifying information including names, addressess, and phone numbers shall be sealed until further order of the court as provided in section 237 CCP.
09222004 42 Case continued to10/06/04at09:00 AMinCourtroom 12forSentencing - Prop 36.
09222004 43 You are referred to Probation pursuant to Prop 36. Report immediately to Room A, Sheriff / Probation Building and follow the instructions of the Probation Officer.
09222004 44 Court Special exhibit # 1 is marked for identification.
09222004 45 Your release on your own recognizance continues.
09222004 46 The court orders you to appear.
09222004 47 File is located to Formal Probation- Room A -(Prop 36)
09222004 48 Court Order for Sealing of Confidential Items Discovered by the People to the Defendantfiled on09/22/04.
10062004 1 Sentencing - Prop 36 Heard in Courtroom 12 on Oct 06, 2004 at 09:00 AM.
10062004 2 Judge Klopfer , Barry B.
10062004 3 Judicial Assistant - Magdaleno , Lisa A.
10062004 4 Court Reporter -Montgomery , Christie Lis present.
10062004 5 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
10062004 6 Deputy District AttorneyBogosianpresent.
**********************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
10062004 7 The court orders the Probation report to be filed.
10062004 8 The Imposition of Sentence is suspended.
10062004 37 The Imposition of Sentence is suspended.
10062004 38
10062004 39 You are to obey all laws, city, county, state and federal.
10062004 40
10062004 41 You shall not alter, adulterate, nor attempt in any manner to falsify any bodily fluids submitted for the determination of the presence of controlled substances, including marijuana.
10062004 42 You shall not use or possess any narcotics, dangerous drugs, controlled substances, marijuana or paraphernalia unless prescribed.
10062004 43
10062004 44
10062004 45 You shall not associate with any person who is using or trafficking in any controlled substance, including marijuana.
10062004 46 Now consent to a search of your person, vehicle, residence, or any other personal or real property under your control, by a peace officer or probation officer at any time, with or without a search warrant, warrant of arrest, or reasonable
10062004 47
10062004 48
10062004 49
10062004 50 You shall not own, possess, have under custody or control or immediate access to any dangerous weapon, firearm, ammunition, oleocapsicum pepper spray, or tear gas pursuant to Section 12403.7(a)(1) of the Penal Code.
10062004 51 You are to pay Crim Justice Adminfee of $120.00.
10062004 52 You shall pay a fine of$200.00to the State Restitution Fund.
10062004 53 You are to pay AIDSfee of $70.00.
10062004 54 You are to pay Drug Analysisfee of $160.00.
10062004 55 You are to pay Drug Programfee of $480.00.
10062004 56 You are to pay Misdemeanor Feefee of $183.00.
10062004 57 You are directed to pay a monthly formal probation fee of$112.00.
10062004 58 The court finds that you have the ability to pay and orders you to pay all costs, fines, fees and restitution.
10062004 59 Defendant accepts probation as stated by court.
10062004 60 The court orders the defendant released on probation.
10062004 61 The defendant has been advised of his/her right to appeal.
10062004 62 Signature Required
10072004 1 This entry is made to vacatePD Registrationfee.
11052004 1 Monthly probation fee of Supervision PROBC assessed of $112.00.
11302004 1 Ex-Parte Declaration of Probation Officeris received.
12012004 1 Ex-parte declaration of probation officersent to JudgePurnell , Roland Nchambers.
12022004 1 Ex-Parte Declaration of Probation Officer signed by JudgePurnell , Roland N, bail set at$0.00, probation revoked.
12022004 2 Ex-Parte Declaration of Probation Officer filed on 12/02/04.
12062004 1 Monthly probation fee of Supervision PROBC assessed of $112.00.
12072004 1 Violation of Probation - Felony - 1203.2a PCwarrant to issue. Bail is 'NO BAIL'. Mandatory appearance.
12072004 2 Ex-parte declaration of probationsent to Records to be attached to file.
12222004 1 Case calendared to12/22/04at01:30 PMinCourtroom 11forArraignment on Violation of Probation.
12222004 2 Arraignment on Violation of Probation Heard in Courtroom 11 on Dec 22, 2004 at 01:30 PM.
12222004 3 Judge Purnell , Roland N.
12222004 4 Judicial Assistant - Barretto , Kristin.
12222004 5 Court Reporter -Cogburn , Erinis present.
12222004 6 Defendant appears in Pro Per status.
12222004 7 Deputy District AttorneyLee, Lisapresent.
12222004 8 Probation is ordered revoked.
12222004 9 Case continued to12/23/04at09:00 AMinCourtroom 12forVOP ARR - Prop 36.
12222004 10 Defendant remanded to custody of Sheriff in lieu of bail in the amount of$0.00.
12222004 11 The court orders you to appear.
12222004 12 File located to courtroom #12.
12232004 1 VOP ARR - Prop 36 Heard in Courtroom 12 on Dec 23, 2004 at 09:00 AM.
**********************************************************************
Docket Entries
Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
12232004 2 Judge Klopfer , Barry B.
12232004 3 Judicial Assistant - Froedge , Tiffany N.
12232004 4 Court Reporter -O'Grady , David Jis present.
12232004 32 The defendant is present in court.
12232004 33 Public DefenderPearisois present in court.
12232004 34 Deputy District AttorneyBogosianpresent.
12232004 35 Doyel of the Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program (ADP) is present in court.
12232004 36 Probation Officer Wilsonpresent.
12232004 37 Probation is ordered revoked.
12232004 38 Case continued to01/03/05at09:00 AMinCourtroom 12forNOTICE OF CHARGES.
12232004 39 The court orders this case referred to probation for formal Notice of Charges and recommendation.
12232004 40 Defendant remanded to custody of Sheriff in lieu of bail in the amount of$25,000.00.
12232004 41 The court orders you to appear.
12232004 42 File located to courtroom #12.
12302004 1 Notice of Chargesis received.
12302004 2 Notice of Chargessent to Judicial Assistant Division to be attached to the file.
01032005 1 NOTICE OF CHARGES Heard in Courtroom 12 on Jan 03, 2005 at 09:00 AM.
01032005 2 Judge Klopfer , Barry B.
01032005 3 Judicial Assistant - Magdaleno , Lisa A.
01032005 4 Court Reporter -Montgomery , Christie Lis present.
01032005 5 The defendant is present in court.
01032005 6 Public DefenderPearisois present in court.
01032005 7 Deputy District AttorneyBogosianpresent.
01032005 8 Jackson of the Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program (ADP) is present in court.
01032005 9 Probation Officer Acunapresent.
01032005 10 TheNotice of Chargesordered filed in court.
01032005 11 Defendant is arraigned on the Notice of Charges.
01032005 12 The defendant admits the allegations as stated on the Notice of Charges.
01032005 13 Probation is ordered revoked.
01032005 14 The Court finds this is strike number one against the defendant's Prop 36 probation grant.
01032005 15 Probation is ordered reinstated and modified on the following terms and conditions:
01032005 16 You are to report to your probation officer immediately. (If in custody report within five (5) days of release from jail).
01032005 17
01032005 18 All terms and conditions previously imposed remain in full force and effect.
01032005 19 The court orders the defendant released on probation.
01032005 20 Defendant is ordered discharged from custody on this case.
01032005 21 Signature Required
01032005 22 File located to Ventura Records.
01052005 1 Monthly probation fee of Supervision PROBC assessed of $112.00.
02052005 1 Monthly probation fee of Supervision PROBC assessed of $112.00.
03052005 1 Monthly probation fee of Supervision PROBC assessed of $112.00.
03182005 1 Request for hearing re:Notice of Chargesfiled byProbation Officer.
03182005 2 Notice of Chargesis received.
03182005 3 Case calendared to03/24/05at09:00 AMinCourtroom 46forNOTICE OF CHARGES.
03182005 4 Request for Hearing/Notice of Chargessent to Judicial Assistant Division to be attached to the file.
03242005 1 NOTICE OF CHARGES Heard in Courtroom 46 on Mar 24, 2005 at 09:00 AM.
03242005 2 Judge Dobroth , John E.
03242005 3 Judicial Assistant - Flores , Jacqueline.
03242005 4 Court Reporter -Cressy , Rhondais present.
03242005 5 The defendant fails to appear in court.
*********************************************************
Docket Entries

Docket Date Docket Number Docket Description
03242005 6 Deputy District AttorneyPollarapresent.
03242005 7 Jackson of the Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program (ADP) is present in court.
03242005 8 Probation Officer Acunapresent.
03242005 9 **Prop 36** Violation of Probation 1203.2a PCto issue. Bail is$25,000.00. Mandatory appearance required. (Prop 36 Case) Upon arrest place in courtroom 46, Monday through Friday at 1:30p.m.
03242005 10 Probation is ordered revoked.
03242005 11 File located to Ventura Records.
05242005 1 Case calendared to05/24/05at01:30 PMinCourtroom 46forPROBATION VOPA36.
05242005 2 VOP ARR - Prop 36 Heard in Courtroom 46 on May 24, 2005 at 01:30 PM.
05242005 3 Judge Dobroth , John E.
05242005 4 Judicial Assistant - Flores , Jacqueline.
05242005 5 Court Reporter -Lawson , Renee Cis present.
05242005 6 The defendant is present in court.
05242005 7 Public DefenderJohnssonis present in court.
05242005 8 Deputy District AttorneyPollarapresent.
05242005 9 Jackson of the Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program (ADP) is present in court.
05242005 10 Probation Officer Acunapresent.
05242005 11 Defendant is arraigned on the Notice of Charges.
05242005 12 The defendant waives his/her right to a hearing as to the Notice of Charges.
05242005 13 The defendant admits the allegations as stated on the Notice of Charges.
05242005 14 Probation is ordered revoked.
05242005 15 Defendant waives his / her right to be arraigned at time of sentencing and indicates there is no legal cause why judgment should not be pronounced.
05242005 16 Prop. 36 termination is the result ofPeople vs Guzman.
05242005 17 Probation is ordered reinstated and modified on the following terms and conditions:
05242005 18 Probation type is corrected to readFormal - Prop 36.
05242005 19 Court orders probation termPADT1;Participate in Assessment Programdeleted.
05242005 20 Court orders probation termPADT2;Confidentiality Laws/Rightsdeleted.
05242005 21 Court orders probation termPATDT;Consent to Tests-Drug Treatment (Prop 36)deleted.
05242005 22 You will hereby consent to any tests to determine the presence of controlled substances, including marijuana, at any time by a peace officer or probation officer.
05242005 23 Probation is ordered terminated unsuccessfully.
05242005 24 You are ordered to serve180Day(s)with credit for0Day(s)actual time in the Ventura County Jail.
05242005 25 Credit actual -122days, 4019(b) PC -22days, for a total of144days.
05242005 26 You are remanded to the custody of the Ventura County Sheriff's Office to commence serving your sentence.
05242005 27 File located to Ventura Records.
05272005 1 Deletion of search terms confirmed. Sheriff's office is notified.
07182005 1 Exhibit Disposition Notice has been generated.
08262005 1 Defendant'sexhibit #A, isDestroyed.
08262005 2 Defendant'sexhibit #B, isDestroyed.
08262005 3 Defendant'sexhibit #C, isDestroyed.
08262005 4 Defendant'sexhibit #D, isDestroyed.
08262005 5 Defendant'sexhibit #E, isDestroyed.
08262005 6 Defendant'sexhibit #F, isDestroyed.
08262005 7 Defendant'sexhibit #G, isDestroyed.
08262005 8 Defendant'sexhibit #H, isDestroyed.
08262005 9 Defendant'sexhibit #I, isDestroyed.
08262005 10 Defendant'sexhibit #J, isDestroyed.
08262005 11 Defendant'sexhibit #K, isDestroyed.
08262005 12 Court Specialexhibit #1, isDestroyed.
*********************************************************************************************************


Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.

Thursday, January 10, 2008

Corrupt judge (Ventura County Superior Court) caught in the act

Prop 36 probation violation. Remanded.
For Ventura County Superior Court;
Criminal case #2001044311;

Glen Michael Wilson; vs. State of California;
May 24th, 2005.
Courtroom 46
Prop 36 revocation court.
Judge Dobroth presiding.

Strange doings in the courtroom.

My being sentenced to 240 days in the county jail, for complete failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of probation, is how it starts.

Five minutes later, it ends with;

Deletion of mandatory drug classes.
Deletion of mandatory urine tests.
Deletion of formal probation.
Deletion of search terms.
Released from jail that evening.

"FOR GOD'S SAKE! DON'T SEARCH HIM!

YOU MIGHT FIND SOMETHING!"

Further evidence of this court's lawlessness, and lack of integrity being systemic, and entrenched among officers of the court in all branches of justice at Ventura Superior Court is evidenced in my prop 36 probation revocation, case hearing entries, of May 24th, 2005. Court room 45. 1:30 p.m. Judge Dobroth, presiding.

From my sentencing on Oct. 6th, 2004, to my prop 36 probation revocation hearing, on May, 24th,2005;

I had never; reported to my probation officer.

I had never; went to any of my twice a week, mandatory urine testings.


I never; set foot in any of the mandatory classes.


When ordered to; "report to court" to deal with these violations, I didn't.

Soooo....

On May 24, 2005, having been "picked up" the evening before on a violation of probation arrest. I find myself in court room 46, 1:30 afternoon court. Judge Dobroth presiding.

I am the first name called, and judge Dobroth in manner, tone, and word is brusque, cold, and oozing his distaste at having to view and talk with such a pile of dirt, that his manner shows that he believes that I am.

He says this;"Mr. Wilson, you havent reported to your probation officer at all."

"You haven't reported for any of your urine tests."

"You haven't gone to any of your classes."

"You didn't report to court when ordered."

"So, I'm going to revoke your prop 36, and give you 240 days Mr. Wilson."

"You have 144 days credit, so you will be doing about 90 days."

"Let's see if that gets your attention."

At this point, I say to him;
"Let's do something different."

Judge Dobroth, thinking that I am trying to beg my way out of this 90 days, like so many people try to do says;

"You don't seem to understand Mr. Wilson, Your prop 36 is revoked. I am giving you 240 days. That's that."

Then in a loud, firm voice I barked this at him;
"No. We CAN do something different."

"I WANT MY 3 YEARS STATE PRISON TIME NOW!"

"So that I can begin my appeal. Knowing that it will go to an appellate court outside of this county's sphere of influence. Where the Rule of Law is still in effect, and my civil liberties protections are in place, and in force."

(Now let's see if my "theory" as to the reason for my sentence of; "probation" holds water)

I swear to you, that this next testimony like everything before it, and after, is the un-embellished truth.

Judge Dobroth gets an; "I've just voided my bladder" look on his face, then hot- foots it over to the prosecutors table.

Approx. 10 to 15 seconds of whispering later, he does a fine little jump and jig back up to the bench.

Then judge Dobroth, like no one I have ever heard before begins to stutter, but with a pleading whine attatched.

Every jaw in the court room dropped. Including mine.

Then he said; "Mr. Wilson, we think we know what your referring to."

"Look, Mr. Wilson, I'm taking you off of formal probation. You don't have to report to anyone."

"And Mr. Wilson, I am deleteing the mandatory testing terms."

"Mr. Wilson, you don't have to go to the classes. I'm deleteing those as well."

"Now you have quite a few days of credit, so I am going to give you 180 days, and;"

Right at this point, the Deputy Dist. Atty., who should be outraged, and demanding to know exactly what is going on, instead, in a not so sotto, sotto voice shrieks at judge Dobroth, with a whiny, anxiety ridden air as well;

"HE'S ONLY GOT 144 DAYS CREDIT!"

JUDGE DOBROTH, CONFUSED, THEN SAYS AGAIN;
"180 DAYS? YOU ONLY HAVE 144?!"

BOTH THE STUTTER , AND THE WHINE BATTLI NG FOR SUPREMACY AS HE FINISHES WITH THIS;
"BUT YOU'LL BE OUT TONIGHT MR. WILSON."

I was. I couldn't make this crap up. I wouldn't try.

ALSO:Three days later, when I am not in court. An extremely unusual entry was added to my 1,200 plus, case hearing docket entries. That make up the long, and winding legal road from arrest, to this probation revocation hearing, just three days past.

Now, on May, 27th, 2005, one line has been added. By who's authority? I don't know.Here is what it says;

"DELETION OF SEARCH TERMS CONFIRMED. SHERIFFS OFFICE IS NOTIFIED."

It appears as if someone doesn't want me showing up in court anymore.

Making the kind of comments that a truthful, greatly outraged individual is likely to makeis one thing.

Having them entered into the court's record, along with the highly revealing, ethically bankrupt response by the presiding judge, that my comments forced him to make, if this matter was to be kept away from judicial review in the appellate court, is quite another.

It seems that the conspirator's plan at this point, to keep the lid on their illegal actions has been reduced to;

"For Christ's sake! Don't search him! You might find something!"

It also is evidence of three other points of importance.

1. That everyone, and I do mean everyone was "prepped" before dealing with me.

2. The "stutter like no utter" and the anxiety of the D.D. Atty. shows that they KNOW that they have no right to moral outrage, as theirs is nothing but the pretense of such by those who have none.

3. This "deletion of search terms" was a knee jerk, desperate reaction of people
that know that there is already way too much evidence of this courts corruption
evidenced in my case hearing records, and transcripts already.

Not just in the form of things that they have done that were illegal, but by the absence of things that they should have done but didn't.

Once again, two more co-conspirators were forced to reveal their involvement by my placing them in a position of either revealing their involvement, or allowing their "control" of the situation to "slip from their hands".

They hate the former option greatly, but not anywhere near as much as they fear the option of losing control of their authority over this case.

I had educated two that hadn't yet learned;

That "everyone" that has lined up against the Law, and what is true in this matter, has left sign of their involvement in the record.

I wouldn't have it any other way.

Truthful statement of facts; by Glen Michael Wilson
FREE THE TRUTH. - CHAIN THE LIE.
JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.



Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

Greg Totten, Ventura County District Attorney's corrupt office.

And it's a long way to Buffalo.
It's a long way to Belfast city too.
And I'm hoping the choice won't blow the hoist
'cause this town, bit off more than they can chew.

(Van Morrisson-Saint Dominic's preview.)

Open letter to Greg Totten: Ventura County's corrupt District Attorney.

Greg Totten; Ventura County's District Attorney has presided over the most corrupt district attorney's office in Calif. for years.

He will tell you that he didn't know that the corruption of his office was systemic.

He is a shit-stained liar.

And I will not rest until Mr. Totten, and several of his "senior deputy district attorneys" are led away in federal chains for the rest of their oath forsaken, soulless lives.

For their complicity in the Murder of Daniel Alizar Hernandez, (shot to death execution style March 9th, 2004) and a mountain of other high felonies that I have discovered.

Along with the Ventura Superior Court case hearing records and transcripts that will place Greg Totten, along with two Oxnard police officers, (think; Martin Polo, and Frank Brisslinger) in death row cells beside him.

I wonder who will be the daddy for all three of you worthless, corrupt Bitches?
***************************
Hear me now!
Oh thou bleak
and unbearable world;

Thou art base,
and debauched
as can be;

And a knight,
with his banners
all bravely unfurled.
Now hurls down
his gauntlet
to thee!"

(Cervantes-Don Quixote)

Unlike Don Quixote, I'm not tilting at windmills.

I know that I have the real, live, legal equivalent of a fire breathing dragon on the tip of my lance.

Where your sorry ass has been since we started doing battle over five years ago Greg.

That's right. You remember me. Glen Michael Wilson. The man your office tried to illegally destroy. But couldn't.

Because the minions and gophers (senior deputy district attorneys) that you assigned to bring about my destruction just were not up to the task.

Neither were the Oxnard Police officers assigned to my execution/hit.

Your fucked up badge and gun carrying murderers couldn't "get er done" and shot the wrong person.

Then they compounded their fuck up by letting two people that I have found see them running resistance for the shooter and his spotter.

In uniform. Driving Oxnard P,D, patrol cars.

You flat out would not believe just how many people a day are now learning the truth about you and your activities. Online.

From Washington D.C., to Sacramento.

And here in Oxnard, and Ventura? Dozens, and dozens of people from both of these towns are waiting to see whether you turn yourself in, or smoke your pistol.

YOU SEE; For the last year, they have been reading online the Ventura Superior Court's own case hearing docket entries that show unambiguously just how morally bankrupt an individual that you are.

Go to:

http://wordwaymike.blogspot.com/2007/10/my-17-start-of-jury-trial-dates-that.html

And see what all the interest is about. You are becoming known nationwide my man!

Then read the rest. While you can. You worthless piece of shit.

************************************
Like Willie Nelson wrote;

Grandpappy told my pappy; "Back in my day son, a man had to answer for the wicked he done. If it takes all the rope in Texas, and every big oak tree. You hang all of them black-hearts, way up high for folks to see."

That Justice is the one thing you must always find. Even if you got to saddle up the boys and draw a hard line. When the gunsmoke clears, we'll sing a victory tune. Then we'll all meet back at the local saloon. And raise our glasses against Evil forces. Whiskey for my men. Beer for my horses. **************************************************************** I want you to know;

I want your associates to know;

I want the people that tell you what to do to know;

That your particular Dog and Pony Show is closing down. For Good!

And don't you worry about informing them Greg. I'm handling that for you right now.

You would have to have a whole room full of bigger fish, (people) to turn on, and turn in, to slither out of never seeing the light of day again.

And you would have to turn on them, before they turned on you.

And they don't have to go to the feds to do that Greg.

They just have to remove you, as the link in this county's soulless cluster fuck to separate themselves from the "hired help"

With you "Gone" They'll have pockets full of "plausible deniability."

In fact I figure that it is even money as to who is gonna deal with you first. The Feds, or your "buddies."

I've waited a long time to bring you to this moment.

When I would get to tell you to;

"Watch as your oath forsaken, morally bankrupt world come flying apart."

So keep your eyes and ears open and alert to the sound and sight of three piece suits, with badges, guns, and warrants that will trump your little fiddle-fuck local action.

You knew when I walked out of the other side of that three year illegal wall of fire that you tossed me into, without giving you the shield and cover of co-signing your lies that I was gonna keep after you till you and this county received the justice that each deserved.

This is probably my last chance to say; "So long, you worthless piece of shit."

So...

"So long, you worthless, shit stained, morally bankrupt, gag a maggot corrupt, piece of shit."

ps;
Personally, if it was me in your wingtips, I'd smoke my gun.

Oh so fucking sincerely,

Glen Michael Wilson
case #2001044311

Do what you want with the existing records.

They have been downloaded by dozens of individuals from lawyers to investigative reporters.

And I have sent the full 1,215 case hearing docket entries along to dozens as well.

Also the court records altered 1, 212; And Also the re-altered 8 months ago 1,210.

Didn't you ass wipes realize that each time that you did that you took statute of limitations right on out of the picture.

By showing that the cover-up is ONGOING.

IDIOTS.

That's why you're "buddies" are gonna "do" you.

Because you're a fucking idiot.

********************************************************

We step out in this world, and take our chances. Fate, is just the weight of circumstances. That's the way that Lady Luck dances. Roll the Bones. Roll the Bones.

Why are we here? Because we're here. Roll the Bones. Roll the Bones.

Why does it happen? Because it happens. Roll the Bones. Roll the Bones. (Rush) *******************************




Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.

Saturday, January 5, 2008

MARTIN POLO; OXNARD POLICE OFFICER.; ACCUSED OF CHILD RAPE.

MARTIN POLO; OXNARD POLICE OFFICER.
PERJURER; ACCUSED RAPIST OF 13 YEAR OLD GIRL; WON'T TESTIFY UNDER OATH ABOUT SUNBATHER'S DEATH THAT HE WAS INVOLVED IN;
AND DOZENS OF OTHER THINGS THAT YOU NEVER KNEW ABOUT;
NO BOTTOM TO HIS LOW POLO.

Here are the most recent evil-doings of Oxnard Police Officer, "Martin Polo." As you read on, you will learn that he was the lead Oxnard P.D. patrol officer that orchestrated, and committed so many straight up federal felony due process, and equal protection violations against my person. With the serious as a heart attack enhancement on all of them of; "Under the color of law."

Also, I will send the news stories that begin last year (almost 18 months ago) that detail how he and his on-duty protege (Frank Brisslinger) had successfully evaded for a year and a half, having to give their testimony, "under oath" in the wrongful death of the sunbather (Cindy Connolly) that they had run over on the beach.

Brisslinger was the other officer at my trial that just slathered the lies on with a frigging butter knife for over twenty minutes. Both of these guys are practiced liars that have the practiced hurt look of a kicked puppy. When they lie on the stand, and you call them on it.

The last story that the Ventura County Star has run on the refusal of these two officers to give their account, on the record, under oath, as to the events leading up to, during and after this woman's death, was May of this year.

The Oxnard P.D. refused to let an independent enforcement agency investigate the "accident".

Then they ruled it to be a tragic accident.

And for over 15 months since that ruling, the Oxnard P.D. has steadfastly refused to let the family of the deceased woman see the investigation photos. (which seeing as how this all happened on beach sand, means that the "stops" and "starts" of the police SUV in relation to the deceased woman's body would probably be easy to ascertain as to whether the non-sworn testimony of these two officers jibes with what the tire impressions reveal.

They, (Oxnard P.D.) have also denied to reveal the names, and statements of the eyewitnesses to their mother's death.

This is in spite of the fact that the family members of this woman have hired an attorney that is ranked as on of the 10 best in Calif. And ranked in the top hundred nationally of lawyers deemed to be; "Most effective." What ever the Hell that means..


Anyway. Back to Oxnard Police Officer Martin Polo.
Well, he has sunk to new lows. The article below was in the Ventura Star on August 21st.

This is the only story that I have seen in the Star-Online that didn't have a "comment box" at the end of the story for people to post their comments.

The paper is still working "hand in hand" with the "powers that be" to make sure that there is no "public forum" that airs all of these truths. With all the dozens and dozens of criminal actions by Polo, and Brisslinger over the years.

Local News

HomeNewsLocal News

Claim alleges Oxnard officer assaulted girl

    The family of a Ventura County teenager with emotional disabilities has filed a $1.5 million claim against the city of Oxnard, alleging she was sexually assaulted by a police officer.
The claim alleges Senior Officer Martin Polo, 43, raped the girl on Aug. 14, 2006, in a police substation after she sought his assistance. The Star does not name alleged victims of sexual assaults.

Oxnard Police Chief John Crombach said Monday that Polo has not been charged with a crime, but he was placed on administrative leave with pay after the claim was filed more than two weeks ago.

The department's sexual crimes unit has been investigating the case — without Polo's knowledge — for nearly a year, with assistance from the Ventura County District Attorney's Office, Crombach said.

According to the claim, the girl, who was 13 at the time, requested the officer's assistance. Polo then allegedly "placed her into his police vehicle" and drove to a police substation, where he "proceeded to rape her and force himself sexually on (her)" at the substation.
The incident caused the teenager "great bodily pain and shock to her nervous system, humiliation, fear, anxiety, torment, degradation and extreme emotional distress," the claim states, adding that she "may continue to incur medical and psychological treatment expenses in the future."

The teenager is now in a "lock down facility out of state due to her mental and emotional condition," according to the claim, which provides few other details.

"There's no other way than to take allegations of this nature with the utmost seriousness and leave no stone unturned," Crombach said. "Either you make the case or you exonerate the case. One or the other, this is a very serious allegation, and we have taken this very seriously."

A 20-year veteran

The department's internal affairs unit also opened an administrative investigation shortly after the claim was filed on Aug. 3, Crombach said. He added that Polo was apprised of both investigations at that time.

Under an administrative investigation, "we can compel an employee to talk to us," Crombach said. "If they don't answer our questions, they can be terminated."

Under a criminal investigation, a suspect must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Crombach said.

Crombach said that Polo, a 20-year veteran of the department, was cooperating. The department expects to make a recommendation to the District Attorney's Office in three weeks on whether to file charges.

Crombach declined further comment, citing concerns of compromising the case.
Polo of Oxnard did not return a call Monday.

Until he was placed on administrative leave, Polo was coordinator for police Beat 21, which operates a community storefront substation in the 3000 block of West Hemlock Street.

Encino attorney Etan Lorant, who is representing the teenager, declined comment Monday.

The claim lists three people as "medical providers": Dr. Steven Ruths, a Ventura psychiatrist; George Cave, case manager at Aurora Vista del Mar, a psychiatric hospital in Ventura; and Diane Jackson with Youth Care, a Draper, Utah, residential treatment facility for adolescents.

Ruths, Cave and Jackson all declined comment Monday.

A claim is filed as a precursor to a lawsuit. Claims involving personal injury must be filed within six months of an alleged incident, Assistant City Attorney Alan Holmberg said Monday.

Lorant is seeking an exemption that allows for late claims if the incident involves a minor, someone who is mentally disabled or an excusable mistake.

The claim describes the girl as "mentally and emotionally disabled." Her father did not immediately file a claim because he mistakenly believed the city must finish its investigation first, according to the claim.

This is the second claim against the city for an incident involving Polo. On June 12, 2006, Polo was the passenger in a department sport utility vehicle involved in the death of a woman who was sunbathing on Mandalay Beach.

The driver, Senior Officer Frank Brisslinger, was exonerated after an investigation by the District Attorney's Office. Polo was not the subject of that investigation.

The family of the woman, Cindy Conolly, 49, of Sioux City, Iowa, has sued the city for $10 million.
*******************

Note: The only reason that the Ventura Star ran this story was because the attorney for this girls family called a press conference. There have been no further follow up stories. Nor will there be. Until this girls attorney calls another press conference in 6 months to a year.

Also: Ventura is the county on the coast just north of Los Angeles County.

The L.A. Times has a Ventura County edition. To churn out the 200,000 thousand plus copies of the L.A. Times for the citizens of Ventura County, the Times has a city block long, and wide, three story "presence" in the city of Ventura.

They have printed NOTHING about the sexual assault investigation of officer Polo.

They did the same obligatory blurb on the woman's death that is a prerequisite minimum that a news outlet can get away with doing when a high profile case has the lawyer from one side or the other call a press conference.

Both the Times, and the Ventura Star have had these case hearing docket entries "walked in" and "e-mailed" to their papers.

Both of these papers have had several different people, turn over highly incriminating evidence as concerns the actions of Polo, and Brisslinger. As relates to these two recent incidences, and my older one. As well as others.

There's just way too much money running through this county's illegal court house.
Plenty to pass around.

And it is either by way of large cash payments to newspaper editors, to bury certain specific stories that could lead to large municipal payouts for major fuck ups, if the truth had its day in court; Or by way of having some sort of compromising/blackmail type information on those people at these papers that could kill a story, or investigation.

Which ever it is, the end result is;

Quid pro quo.
The Lawless Lie runs the show.
And around here, it's a three ring circus dog and pony Cluster-fuck.

Glen Wilson

Free the Truth. Chain the Lie.
JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

2 comments:

Anonymous said...
I don't know why people aren't talking about this. The girl was actually 12 years old, making it molestation and not rape. He had given her his personal phone number "in case she ever needed help" and when she DID, he picked her up and then raped her in the police station. Afterwards, the girl was so distraught she tried to kill herself. This bastard deserves every punishment conceivable.
Glen Michael Wilson said...
People, in general are not "talking" because the people that REALLY control the law's authority, and its instruments of power in this county are not servants of the Law.

They are servants of the Lie.

The people that call the shots in this county, right down to the Oxnard P.D. sanctioned execution style slaying of Danial Alizar Hernandez, on March 9th, 2004 have no bottom to their low.

And while I can't place Polo, or Brisslinger in either of the two Oxnard patrol cars that "ran resistance" for the shooters getaway vehicle, and his spotters get away vehicle the night he was killed, I would bet my bottom dollar that both of those black-hearted individuals were on scene for that killing.

It's what they do.

I have found two eye-witnesses that saw two O.P.D. patrol cars on scene, and less than 70 yards away from Hernandeze's five bullets to the head and chest execution. In the well lit area just out side of Channel Islands Wine and Spirits. At Hemlock, and Victoria. Where many threads f this public corruption truthful narrative of mine runs through.

They, (the two O.P.D. officers in these two patrol cars) remained motionless as the two getaway vehicles, with tires squealing and engines racing pulled out directly in front of where they were parked.

It was as if they were "there" in case some "concerned citizen" gave chase.

If that were to happen, (it didn't) the police officers could race up behind him, (concerned public citizen) turn on thier lights, and siren.

Hold him, or her, at the side of the road for 30, to 45 seconds.

Then race off, like you're on a mission.

When in actuality, your mission was just accomplished.

Here are SOME of the people at the top of the morally bankrupt, food-chain in this county. And I am speaking from repeated, personal experience.

No really. I have seen them take their "mask" off. I have seen them at work crafting the "facade."

I hae been in a 5 plus years battle royale with all of the local govt. officials named individuals.

I would never level such accusations against someone based upon the characterizations made by others as to their honesty, or lack there of.

I have been at the mery of all of the above named individuals. More than once, or twice. And they have no mercy.

It is only by the grace of God, I believe, that I came out the other side of their trap. Without my physical and mental persona being destroyed completely.

For that was their aim. And they worked hard and long in a concerted effort to make my destruction complete.

So my assessment of these people is based upon many; "up close, and personal" dealings with these, and other members of a quite large, and very dangerous cut-throat crew.

People such as;

District Attorney Greg Totten.
(and you can bet the senior deputy district attorneys that are a part of his; "inner sanctum"

Ventura County Sheriff, Bob Brooks.

Ventura Superior Court Judges; Cloninger; and Coleman

The owners of Tiger Real Estate Fund LP. (They are the folks that "bought out" Martin V. Smith.)

The development team from D.R. Horton; (The number 1 planned community home/resort/condo/ and high end shopping centers, and gallerias builders in the world.

Go to:
http://www.seabridgemarina.com/

Click on: Photo Gallery

Then: Aerial;
Then: Construction updates

Over a square mile of;

Man-made channels;
Million plus homes;
high end condos;
A Four Star resort;
And a Vons Super Store anchored shopping center

From Wooley Rd. To Ketch St.

From Victoria Ave. Almost to Harbor Blvd.

I have nothing against progress. Or the rich. Or fancy super-markets.

But you tell me how all of this pops up almost over-night. (About a year and a half to get the first two phases completed.

With out community involvment.

No public meetings. Look it up.

Things like this are only possible when the rule of law is negated.

Read: "What I learned that made me the target of corrupt public officials."
AT:
http://wordwaymike.blogspot.com/2007/05/what-i-learned-that-made-me-target-of.html
***************
Read the other truthful statements, as to Oxnard P.D. officer Martin Polo. And Brisslinger. And others.



Read my; 17 jury trial dates derailed by officers of the Ventura Superior Court. (judges; prosecutors, and court appointed counsels)

http://wordwaymike.blogspot.com/2007/10/my-17-start-of-jury-trial-dates-that.html
*********************
My case is over. Has been since 2005. But you will learn a lot from; THE SUPERIOR COURTS OWN CASE HEARING DOCKET ENTRIES which I include.

Some people are talking about how messed up this situation is.

I am. You are.

And there are others that have been forced to come to the un-wanted but unfortunately true conclusion that the Lawless have gained control of Law's authority.

They control the Temple of our Law's in Ventura County.

They hate the truth. And those that speak it.

After reading (if you do) my truthful statements of my battles with the corrupt judges, prosecutors, advocates, and police, (that's all four branches of justice in Ventura County) your next question will probably be...

So what about the Feds?

For your answer to that question, you need to read;

Everything that FBI special agent Michael Templin was told.

http://wordwaymike.blogspot.com/2007/03/first-phone-conversation-with-fbi-agent.html

AND:
"I finally meet FBI agent Michael Templin, but don't know it.

http://wordwaymike.blogspot.com/2007/03/i-finally-meet-fbi-agent-michael.html

(He portrays himself to be the supervisory agent in charge of "himself" to illegally obtain a copy of my formal complaint of; "Civil Liberties violations against my person by a DOJ employee."

That I had filed with the Dept. of Justice-Office of the Inspector General.
****************
If you want to know the world around you, and see it as it really is. And not how it is "crafted" to appear to the casual observer, then read on.

It wasn't always like this. In fact, most of what I have learned has transpired since shortly after 9-11.

You see, we gave Law enforcement, State, Federal, Local, a free run.

"War on terror." Go get them!

They quickly learned, or were
co-ordinated to take advantage of, this "hieghtened state of emergency"

We "blank-checked" the entire lot.
We blank-checked individuals, that for the most part have a finger pointing, "I'm right. You're wrong." authority mind set to start with, then took the oversight out of the equation.

Is it any wonder that they don't want to return to be "held accountable?

There is a lot of money to be made by just... "looking the other way."

Taking care of the "really" important people.

After all, they just want us police officers to "remove" the undesirables. (The poor. Elderly. Disabled.)

Those people on fixed incomes that are percieved as bringing down the value of properties in this, or that neighborhood.

Local govt. individuals love big, high dollar developments.

More tax revenue equals largers staffs. More power.

Also; There are always a mountain of "red-tape" cutting "quid pro quo" opportunities for many different dept. heads.

Planning commissions.
Zoning Comissions.
Demographics.
Population density studies. Traffic Dept.
Water Dept.
Waste and reclamation Dept.
Cabal franchises to be awarded. Building Codes.
Coastal Comission.

All have conditions. Rules.

All have dept heads. (waivers. exemptions. or just falsified as; "completed")

They realized that it would be years before the chickens came home to roost.

And many local "racketeers" there really isn't any other word for what they are doing, would have consolidated enough power before it did to fend off most, if not all attempts to pry these peoples fingers off of the Law's powers that they now have.

For to relinquish these powers is to see the beginning of their own eventual destruction.



Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.

Martin Polo - Oxnard police officer - perjurer, accused child rapist - corrupt to the bone.

OXNARD POLICE OFFICER - MARTIN POLO-
When you can't afford to do it right.

NO BOTTOM TO HIS LOW POLO.

AND HIS PARTNER IN CRIME(S)
PERJURED TESTIMONY PROTEGE
FRANK BRISSLINGER.

The Oxnard Police Dept. is now vigorously fighting the deceased woman's family, in their attempt to look at the Oxnard P.D.'s investigation paperwork, and photos of the incident.

Also, refusing to let the family see the internal performance records of both Polo, and Brisslinger.

Both Polo, and Brisslinger perjured themselves at my trial.


They are fighting the family's request to see the O.P.D.'s investigation of the death. I believe possibly because the photo evidence of the accident/crime scene may not support the officers claims of being "unaware" that they had run over someone, until they received a call on their SUV's police radio.

If they realized immediately after running over the woman that they had done so, anyone's initial first reaction would be to abruptly brake to a stop. On sand, if you do that, there will be four piles of sand, one in front of each tire, pushed up in front of the tire.

Then, if you decide to "play it off" as if you didn't know what you had done, you would give it enough gas to get rolling quick. That would displace more than the normal amount of sand than just; "rolling on through" would. Both actions would be easily visible in photos of the accident scene.

Both Polo, and Brisslinger perjured themselves at my trial.

My trial was a couple of years before the running over the woman on the beach incident.

Both have a long history of complaints by citizens, and internal police dept. actions. Officer Polo also was demoted from detective to Sgt. for lying to the District Attorney's office while under oath. That is the only action that has seen the light of day, as it became a part of the public record.

The rest of the "disciplinary actions", that demoted him from sgt. to corporal. And from corporal to "senior patrolman" are departmental, and therefore hidden from the public's sight, for the most part.


And yet, here they are. Patrolling the beach.

The plum assignment for a patrol officer in Oxnard.

The nicest, most crime free section of town.

The plum ride. The Oxnard P.D.'s 4 wheel drive SUV.

Why?

I believe that it is because of the fact that when "the powers that be" in this city/county need someone to "cross that line" and not be worried about how that will affect their permanent record, who better to get than someone who's record can't be harmed anymore than it already is?

Also; Think about this; What does this tell the patrolmen that are a part of Oxnard P.D.?

It tells them this;

If you want to advance within this organization, these officers, and their actions, are what you need to emulate.
********************************************

OXNARD POLICE OFFICER; MARTIN POLO
(When you can't afford to do it right.)


Truthful statement of illegal actions committed against my person, and others, by Oxnard Police Officer, Martin Polo.

Formally:Detective Polo.
Formally: Sgt. Polo
Formally:Corporal Polo
Currently: Senior Patrolman Polo

There is so much to say about senior patrolman Martin Polo. Unfortunately, all of it is bad. He is legendary, within the city of Oxnard, among those that end up on his; "list of things to do." (to people)

The list, of people, as well as the things done to them, are both extensive. It is not just the illegal damage that he has wrought in my life, although he has most certainly done that. It is how far and wide he has managed to spread his misery around, that is truly amazing.

As well as how many times that he has been taken to task, by his superiors, the district attorneys office, Oxnard P.D.'s Internal affairs, and yet, there he is! In uniform. On duty.

Not just on duty, but plum duty. West-Oxnard, day shift watch commander duty. Shot caller of all daytime patrolmen in west Oxnard.

When I talk plum assignment, he has it. The nicest, most crime free section of the city.

Beaches. Fisherman's Wharf. Million dollar homes.


The plum ride. A 4 wheel drive SUV. Soak up the sun. Take an hour, or an hour an a half coffee break, at Silverstrand beach each morning. Where he can watch the pretty girls, while he slowly wakes up. Take a long lunch.

He was a Sgt. when he first got the assignment, in March, of 2002. When the previous west-side day shift watch commander had to make himself scarce, after I discovered his instigation, and continued involvement in the repeated thefts of my two dogs, Sassy, and Lowjack, at the request of Tiger's property agent.
(by the use of lies, falsified reports, pre-positioned animal control officers and truck)

Polo's been knocked down two pay grades since then. He's been the subject of more than one internal affairs investigations since then. But even reduced to senior patrolman, this is "his" beat.

He earned it. Not by years of dedicated professionalism, but by being the "go to" guy, when you need some one who's career can't be hurt by such things as "black marks"

Consequently, he doesn't mind a few more. As long as the "perks" of power,
like the plum assignment, SUV, and a deliberately unobserved, free reign atmosphere in which he can do what he does best. Which is...,

That depends on who you ask. Those that turn him loose, will tell you one story. Those that he is turned loose on will tell you the truth.

Brace yourself, there is a lot of it to be told. You would make things better? You could do much good here.

If you ever bring your investigation to Oxnard, there will be no shortage of people that will come forward to truthfully relate the most amazing array of civil liberties violations, large and small.

More than you could imagine could be hid along with officer Polo under just one rock.

Look no further, for all others are just pretenders to the throne of "under color of authority" civil liberties violators.


Senior patrolman Martin Polo is the national poster child in waiting for that title.

I will start by just listing his civil liberties violations, that he rolled out on me. Then the details.

POLO'S CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS UNDER COLOR OF LAW.

April 10th, 2003-May, 10, 2003

Placing over 3,000 dollars in tickets on my R.V. (home) in approx. one month, then impounding it. To render me homeless.


(Tickets like: "parked over 72 hours, when I had been there 2 or 3 hours. Or; "too close to a fire hydrant", when there wasn't even one on that block.)

April 10th, 2003- April 20th, 2003


During the same period, when I would move my RV across Hemlock St., which was the boundary line between Oxnard, and the city of Port Hueneme, to avoid being falsely ticketed daily.

Officer Polo lied to the Port Hueneme police officers that worked that section of P.H., telling them that the woman staying with me, Sue Mullins, was a prostitute. Going on to say that I was "working" her out of my R.V.

She was in reality staying with me for sanctuary from her ex boyfriend, Adam Higley, who was stalking her. (who not long after this time period, aligned himself with officer Polo, signing the false statements that officer Polo needed to give him, "the illusion of probable cause."

In return for Polo's help in "bringing Sue around" to the fact that she
belonged to Adam)

You don't know me, but if you did, for any amount of time, you would know that this is something that I have never done, or could ever do.

Many people in this town have seen me daily for years. I suggest that you ask people that have seen my behavior towards people in general, and women in particular about my nature.

I don't fear the judgment of those that know me. Whether they might like me or not.

Only someone who had no idea at all as to my basic character would lay this at my door. It isn't only that I have never done this, and never would. It is that I never could do this. Period.

(Higley had beaten, and choked her, threatened to kill her, and had falsly imprisoned her for three days, less than 7 months previously. When the police came to effect her release, Adam jumped out a window, ran down to a four way stop, and yanked a motorist out of his vehicle!

I have seen the temporary restraining order out of San Diego myself.

Officer Polo was doing this in the hopes that they would "drive" me back across Hemlock St., into Oxnard where he could renew his harassment. (the Port Hueneme police knew Polo's history, and mine, so it only worked for a couple of days, with a couple of rookies)

April 20th, 2003

Co-ordinating my first arrest at my place of employment, on a false charge, then going to five of my friends apartments in channel Island Village Apts., while I was being transport-ed to jail.

Pushing his way inside, and telling them; "If you let Mikey (me) eat, sleep, rest, shower, use the phone, you're next."

Having an Oxnard P.D. officer, (Brisslinger) on this night at my place of employment who was responding to a 911 call made by the woman that was staying with me, (Sue Mullins) for help, as her ex boy friend, (Adam Higley) was threatening her, disregard her request for protection.


She was holding the expired, temporary restraining order that detailed the false imprisonment, beatings, choking, threats to kill, and that when the police came to free her after three days, the ex boyfriend jumped out a window, ran down to a four way stop, and yanked a motorist out of his vehicle, to drive away.

Instead of offering protection, the officer, (Brisslinger) brushed her aside, and would not look at or take the the restraining order from her hand. Instead, after brushing her aside, he said to me; "You look high. Put your hands behind your back, you're under arrest." (I wasn't high, I was at work.)

When the woman started crying, the officer said; "I'll give you a five minute head start on Adam." I can't describe the terror in her eyes, or how fast she fled. Both were remarkable.


The next day, (April, 21st, 2003) Adam found out where Sue was hiding. It was at a friend's condo in Port Hueneme. Ron Edward's place. (About eight blocks away from the Oxnard city boundary line.)

He begins pounding on the door. Ron had never had any dealings with Adam, so he opens the door.

Adam knocks him to the ground and starts stomping Ron. Then quits this to go look
for Sue before she can get away. While doing this; Ron calls Port Hueneme 911, and reports a home invasion assault.


Adam hears this, and on the way out of the condo, stomps Ron a few times more.
Higley evidently calls Oxnard p.d, officer Polo, who had to be close by, or possibly waiting for Adam to get Sue.


Because officer Polo now wants Adam out of the county. So that he can't be questioned about the "false statements" that he provided Polo, that gave him (Polo) the "illusion of probable cause".

That "illusion of probable cause" Polo used to arrest me.


But Adam won't leave with out Sue. Polo hated me. Adam hated me. They both used each other to get what they wanted. But now it was time for Polo to cut Adam loose.

Just as two Port Hueneme police patrol cars screeched to a stop outside Ron's condo, Officer Polo's SUV screeches to a stop beside theirs.


Polo gets out of his SUV and confers with the two P.H. policemen for a minute. Then the Port Hueneme officers drive off.

Allowing Oxnard officer Polo handle their home invasion, assault, 911 call. Alone.

NOTE: This will be evidenced by the Port Hueneme police radio call logs for April 21st, 2003.

He walks up to the front door. Ron is still on the ground. Sue has come into the living room, and a third person, Brian, was at the Breakfast nook, on the kitchen side looking into the living room.


All three told me the same thing.

Polo was grinning, with a toothpick in his mouth. He looks at Sue and says; "Mikey (me) is gone. Forget about Mikey."


Still grinning, he looks down at Ron, still on the floor, hurt, and dazed, and says; "You don't want any more trouble with Adam?" "You don't want any trouble with me?"

"Let Adam have her."

Then he turned and walked away.

May 15th, 2003

In charge of second false arrest at my place of employment 3 weeks later. Telling bartender on duty; "Tell the owners that if they want to keep their liquor license, they should let Mikey go."


All six officers Polo, and five others, were on bikes. The first of only two times that I ever saw Polo on a bike.


The other time was when he pushed his way into my friends house looking for me to falsely arrest on a later date.


Here is why he was on a bike;


By being on my bike, and also being the arresting officer, Polo can call for a transporting officer.


At my preliminary, on June second, I can't wait to get Polo on the stand, I can't wait to get on the record every little conniving thing that he has done.

To me, to Sue Mullins, to Ron Edwards.

I can't wait to ask him about His relationship with Adam Higley.

I can't wait for him to perjure his self, as I was sure that he would.

I can't wait...,

I'm still waiting. Two and a half years later.


You see, it was the transporting officer, and only the transporting officer that showed up at the preliminary hearing.

Who didn't know anything about the arrest, or the previous one on April 20th, 2003, or Adam Higley, or Sue Mullins, or Ron Edwards, or his threat to the
bartender, about the owners losing their liquor license or anything other than;


"I received a call from officer Polo, requesting a transport officer, as
he was on Bike patrol. "


Bike patrol my ass!

In both of these false arrests at my place of employment, he used the false statements of the violent ex boyfriend, of the woman who was living with me, as the "illusion of probable cause" to arrest me.

He also used to false statements of this individual to give him the "illusion of probable cause" when he pushed his way into five of my friends apts.


Pushing his way into another friends house looking for me, to falsely arrest me again with name tag removed.

At my trial, officer Polo perjured himself under oath by saying that he had never pushed his way in to that house. That he had never been in that house.


There were two people that lived at that house who he pushed out of the way, when he came in looking for me, who will testify to that under oath, when all of this comes out into the open, and they won't be subject to retaliation.

Truthful statement made by Glen Michael Wilson.
FREE THE TRUTH. - CHAIN THE LIE.
JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.









Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

Friday, January 4, 2008

FUCK YOU! GLEN A. "NOT SO" FINE. DOJ-INSPECTOR GENERAL. YOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT!

DEPARTMENT OF "JUST US" COVER UP BITCH.


Below is a copy of the actual e-mail that I sent to the Department of Justice-Inspector General, by the DOJ's secure electronic filing avenue that is set up to deal with nothing but; "Civil liberties violations of a citizens constitutional rights by a DOJ employee." At a DOJ congressional oversight committee hearing in 2004 the Dept. of Justice aknowledged that over 70 percent of ALL complaints of this nature are filed with the DOJ-OIG by this avenue.

I can see why the DOJ-OIG likes it. They don't respond. EVER. If they don't respond. They don't have to refute allegations of criminal actions by a DOJ employee. This s especially helpful if the criminal actions are irrefutable.

Almost a year later. And Glenn Fine the DOJ-OIG still hasn't responded. Neither has any of his minions, and gophers. Fuck you! Glen "not so" Fine.
You are a worthless piece of shit.
**********************************
Sir,
In early 2004, I filed a complaint with your office, (Department of Justice-Office of the inspector General) It was a complaint of; "Civil liberties violations by a Department of Justice employee." (FBI special agent, Michael Templin. Ventura Calif. FBI branch office)

I filed this complaint by way of the DOJ- Office if the Inspector General's secure, "complaint's of civil liberties by a DOJ employee" filing e-mail site.

This is the complaint filing site that your Office had set up to address complaints of this specific nature.

This site can only be accessed by going to the U.S. Department of Justice's Home Website.

The Department of Justice's "Office of Professional Responsibility" has stated in their annual reports to the DOJ's Congressional Oversight Comittee that approx. 70 percent of all complaints of; "Civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" are filed with the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General via this electronic complaint filing avenue.

Right next to the "submit" button at the bottom of the electronic complaint form was a "box" with this message next to it; "Check here if you want aknowledgment of the reciept of your complaint by the DOJ-OIG."

I checked this box when I sent my initial complaint filing, and twice more over the two weeks, when I sent "complaint additions" to the DOJ-OIG.

I never recieved "aknowledgement of reciept of my complaint." For any of these complaint filings.

Nor has any represenitive from the office of the DOJ-OIG ever contacted me in regards to my complaint.

In the two years after my initial complaint filing of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" with your office, I contacted your Office another 16 times, by the same
DOJ-OIG's secure, complaint filing e-mail avenue. Seeking; "Status of my complaint of Civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee."

The Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General has never responded to any of the 16 "status of complaint" requests either.

These were requests for basic information that anyone would have a right to know, and would want to know.

Especially if they had felt that their constitutional rights to "Due process, and equal protection under the law." had not only been violated by a Department of Justice employee, but that they had been deliberately violated by a DOJ employee, "Under the Color of Law."

Here are the specific request's for information that I repeatedly contacted your Office, 16 times over a two years plus period to provide to me;

(1.) Status of my complaint.

(2.) Name of the DOJ-OIG agent in charge of investigating my complaint.

(3.) To what person, and to what address do I send the court records evidence, and
witness names, that would bolster my claims that FBI special agent Michael
Templin had more than enough verifiable information to act in my behalf.
When I initially came to him with evidence of public corruption, that was
committed by officers of the Ventura County Superior Court. (Federal
crimes that the FBI has a statutory obligation to investigate.)

(4.) My request in all of these contacts, for the help of the Inspector General's
Office to; "get the block that was in place, on my filing a
"formal, written complaint" of; "conspiracy to deny due
process, and equal protection under the law." against the;
"Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court."

That had been erected by FBI special agent Michael Templin. At both the
Ventura, and Los Angeles, Calif. FBI branches. (If there is no "formal
written complaint" there are no irrefutable allegations to
refute.)

In my last complaint addition to the DOJ-OIG, On or about Sept. 20th, 2004. I truthfully relayed how FBI special agent Michael Templin, had mis-represented himself to me. On July 2nd, 2004. By his claiming to be; "The supervisory agent in charge" of FBI agent Michal Templin." (himself)

Doing this, to secure from me, a complete copy of my "complaint of civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee." That I had filed with the DOJ-Office of the Inspector General.

To all of the above; Complaint filings;

To all of the above; Basic, requests for status of the DOJ-OIG's investigation;

To all of the above; Honest, sincere, truthful pleas for help from your office;

TOTAL SILENCE.

Why is this? If your investigation were to conclude that I was wrong in my belief that the complaint that I filed with your office against FBI agent Michael Templin was valid, then you should address my allegations point by point, and refute them point by point.

In writing. So that your office is on the record as to what conclusions the OIG's investigation of my complaint has arrived at.

It's called; A FINDING.

One that either supports my allegations. Or refutes them.

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL IS THE PEOPLE'S LAST SHIELD AND WEAPON OF THIS NATION'S LAW.

THAT IS SWORN BY SACRED OATH, MANDATED BY LAW, AND OBLIGATED BY ANY STANDARD OF ETHICAL AND MORAL DECENCY THAT YOU CARE TO MEASURE IT WITH TO;

PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY AGAINST THE CRIMINAL PREDATIONS OF INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE ABUSED THE GREAT POWERS THAT ARE GIVEN TO A FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT.

Your office has maintained total silence to all requests for a FINDING.

It is beginning to look as if the present Inspector General of the Department of Justice has subverted the mission of the DOJ-OIG from honestly, and openly investigating a citizen's allegations of High Federal Crimes, to a baser an less honorable task.

Which seems to be; "Using this complaint filing process to get a "Heads Up" on what evidence of Federal Crimes that were committed by a DOJ employee have been discovered by a private citizen.

To craft alibis, or minimize the impact of what evidence there might be. In advance of a person going public.

Because for a year or so, most people will think that you are honest ethical individuals. Diligently working "towards the truth."

You should be. The process of investigaing such serious allegations should be open and above reproach.

With out even the appearance of impropiety.

Too late for that isn't it?

In this request for status of the investigation of my complaint of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee, I request that the:

INSPECTOR GENERAL: GLENN A. FINE; of the; Department of Justice - Office of the Inspector General, respond to my request for "status of my complaint. And the above listed basic, reasonable requests for basic, reasonable information that I have a right to know.

This time, I also request from you sir, Glen A. Fine, and no one else, an explanation as to why your office has conducted itself in such an ethicaly suspect manner as concerns the disposition of my complaint.

If you haven't responded honestly to this basic request before "end of business" Tuesday, May 22, you can answer my questions before the DOJ's congressional oversight committee.
On the record. In public.

How ever you prefer.

Sincerely,
Glen Michael Wilson
XXXXXXXXXXX

Oxnard, Calif.



Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

Department of Justice cover up of dirty FBI agent.

Corruption in the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General stonewalls my complaint for three and a half years.

Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General complaint filings.

Dept.of Justice-OIG- status of my complaint-filings

Below are five of the sixteen complaint additions to my original complaint of; "Denial of civil liberties protections by a DOJ employee" that I filed with the Dept. Of Justice- Office of the Inspector General.



My original complaint, and 16 "complaint additions" were sent to the Dept. of Justice-OIG via the DOJ-OIG's secure electronic e-mail site. The original complaint consisted of these two statements;

(#1) "August 5th, 2003: First call to FBI agent Michael Templin."

(#2) "What FBI agent Michael Templin was told about the "Conspiracy to deny my civil liberties"

Between March, 2004, and Sept. 2005, I filed several more "status of complaint" requests through the same DOJ-OIG secure electronic e-mail site that can only be accessed from the DOJ Home web site. Each time I requested basic information, in a civil manner, that anyone would expect a response to.

I NEVER RECIEVED EVEN AN AKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECIEPT RESPONSE FROM THE DOJ-OIG.

A third complaint addition was added in Sept., 2005. It detailed how FBI agent Michael Templin pretended to be HIS own "supervising agent in charge" as he phrased it, to get his hands on a complete copy of my "complaint of civil liberties violations by a Dept. of Justice employee." that I had filed with the DOJ-OIG; AGAINST AGENT TEMPLIN.

This e-mail site is set up to handle nothing else but complaints of this nature.

It can only be accessed from the Dept. of Justices home web page, which states that it was set up to channel complaints of;

"Department of Justice employees who have violated a persons civil liberties." directly to the Office of the Inspector General.

Right above the "submit" button there was a box that had this statement off to its side; "Check here if you want aknowledgment of reciept by the DOJ-OIG of your complaint."

I checked this box. For each of my three complaint filings. As well as for each of my numerous, "status of complaint" queries. Complaint filing after complaint filing.

Right up until this day, (Jan. 17th, 2007) I have yet to recieve aknowledgement from the DOJ-OIG that my complaint has even been recieved.

These last 5 "status of complaint" queries, which I sent after 11 other ones, that the DOJ-OIG never responded to, became more and more disdainful of the obvious stone walling of my complaint.

BY THE INVESTIGATIVE ARM OF THE DOJ.

The tone of each became more sarcastic, and angry. I wanted them to know that I wasn't going away.

I wasn't gonna turn loose of FBI agent Michael Templin.

And that from this point on, I was going to come after them in every way that was legal.

I served the DOJ-OIG notice that; "IT WAS ON!"


**************************************
Sir,

Once again, I request the status of my complaint of civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee.

Once again, I request the name of the investigating agent in charge.

Once again, I request the name and address of the person that I can send additional case information to.

Once again, I request assistance in removing the block placed upon my person by someone within the FBI.

That keeps me from filing a civil liberties complaint against officers of the Ventura Calif. Superior Court. For violations of my due process, and denial of my right to equal protection under the law.

Once again, I inform you that my life, and liberty are at serious risk of being lost, due to the repeated criminal actions, committed against my person by officers of the Ventura County Superior Court.

Criminal actions that FBI agent Michael Templin is well aware of.

Criminal actions that FBI agent Michael Templin might share complicity in.

Your office acts as if such things have no precedence, and therefore must not be occurring in this instance.

Your office acts as if no federal agent of the Department Of Justice has ever committed crimes of this seriousness and nature, and therefore could not possibly be guilty of such in this matter.

Your office, by not responding even once, in over 20 months to my complaint additions, or repeated pleas for help, acts as though there is no need for anyone from your office to question me.

Is this because you have questioned agent Templin, and his immediate superior, and their assurances that there is no need for your office to look any further into this matter is sufficient?

Does the Office of the Inspector General exist to uncover criminal actions by DOJ employees, or is the function of your office now primarily to keep criminal actions, by DOJ employees, from being viewed in the light of day?

Is it the aim of your office to uphold the rule of law, as concerns the actions of DOJ employees, or is it to sweep such serious instances as I have alleged under the "rug"?

Are you refusing to investigate my allegations in an effort to keep criminal actions by a DOJ employee from besmirching the reputation of the DOJ?

Once again, I request the aid of your office in this matter.

Once again, I request that your office contact me, as concerns the disposition of this matter.

Once again, I request that the DOJ-OIG uphold the law.

Once again I ask that the DOJ-OIG perform their oath sworn duty, as concerns this matter.

FREE THE TRUTH.
CHAIN THE LIE.

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.


Respectfuly, and sincerely,

Glen Michael Wilson
xxxx * Fisher Way,
Oxnard, Calif. 93033

*************************************** ******

More Dept of Justice stonewalling

To: Inspector General-Department Of Justice
From: Glen Michael Wilson

Subject: DOJ-OIG's refusal to initiate a fair, and credible investigation of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" (That I filed with the DOJ-OIG against FBI agent Michael Templin, Ventura Calif. branch, over two years ago.)

Sir,
Over two years ago, I initiated a complaint of; "civil liberties violations by a Department of Justice employee", via the secure e-mail site that your agency had set up to deal with this issue, and this issue alone.

In this period of time, I have not even received "acknowledgment of receipt" of my complaint by you office.

Even though I have requested in over 15 complaint addition filings, via your complaint e-mail site. The most basic information, as to the status of my complaint, that anyone would expect a response to;

SUCH AS;

Name of the investigating agent in charge of my complaint.

Status of my complaint,

To what person, and in what manner do I send witness names, and additional court records evidence, that supports the veracity of my complaint.

I have recently learned from a FBI agent that my case has been sent back to the FBI as a: "management referral, in house determination of how to proceed, as pertains to your complaint. against FBI agent Michael Templin."

WHAT IN THE HELL IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?

I recognize disingenuous double speak that is designed to be devoid of any real meaning when it is sent my way. Especially when it is designed to deflect my two year, numerously repeated attempts to get your office to; "uphold the Law and perform your oath sworn duties."

If my allegations have no merit, go on the record as to what I have stated as true about FBI agent Michael Templin's actions that are not.

What is the basis for the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General to abrogate its duties to be the investigative arm of the DOJ when the investigation of allegations of civil liberties violations are brought against a DOJ employee?

Is it the policy of the DOJ-OIG to ignore all attempts by a citizen who has lodged a complaint to learn what the status of his complaint IN REALITY IS?

Please respond to this e-mail by contacting me via my e-mail.

e-mail:glenmwilsonking@hotmail.com

I have made some of the most serious allegations of criminal actions by a DOJ employee that any one can bring.

Investigate honestly, and fairly.

Refute my allegations,
OF SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIONS BY FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN,
(Ventura, Calif. branch office)
or
Confirm their veracity. IN WRITING.

Send me a copy.

Sincerely,
Glen Michael Wilson


FREE THE TRUTH. CHAIN THE LIE.

*************************************** *****

DOJ-Office of the Inspector General blocks investigation

Corrupt cops, judges, prosecutors, FBI personnel and the billionaire criminals that love them.

Federal stonewalling bottom feeding morally bankrupt individuals on parade.

After you get about one third of the way through this thirteenth request for; "status of my complaint" after almost a year and a half of total silence fro the DOJ-OIG you will notice that my tone, as well as intent of the letter both undergo a shifting of the paradigm.

Shortly after I wrote this, I re-read it and thought to myself; "Mikey, you lost it." Looking back on it again with another 16 months of silence by the DOJ-OIG added to their initial 16 months of stonewalling, I now believe that: "Mikey, you found it!"

From the writing of this request for; "status of complaint" that changed into a full on, legitimate, disgust filled rant at the bottom feeders that have been placed in their lofty positions of power and authority to negate the Law.

*************************************** ************************

From: Glen Michael Wilson
To: Office of the Inspector General - DOJ

Subject: Continued stonewalling of my complaint by DOJ-OIG

Sir,
Once again, I am contacting the DOJ-OIG, as I have over a dozen times in the past 16 months, by way of the electronic (e-mail) "complaint of civil liberties violation by a DOJ employee." intake site that is listed on your Department of Justice "Official Website" as the acceptable avenue, set up by the DOJ-OIG to initiate a complaint of this nature via e-mail against a DOJ employee.

Once again, I am hoping against hope that this renewed attempt to have my complaint reviewed, investigated, and answered by your office, (OIG) as to the allegations that I have brought forward again, and again.

Answered by the Office of the Inspector General, as to what your findings are. As relates to the veracity of my allegations against DOJ employee, FBI agent Michael Templin, (Ventura Calif. branch) and the merits, or lack of such, as pertains to the civil liberties violations that I allege.

*** From day one, over 16 months ago, I have been met with silence by the OIG.

***From day one, ALL requests for "STATUS OF INVESTIGATION" have been met with silence.

***From day one, ALL attempts to ascertain who I should send pertinent evidence; ie; court records, pictures, and substantiating testimony from credible witnesses, has been met with complete silence.

***From day one, ALL attempts to gain the name of the investigating agent from the DOJ-OIG's that is in charge of reviewing my complaint has been met with..., You guessed it! SILENCE!

*** THIS ISN'T AN INVESTIGATION OF A CITIZEN'S COMPLAINT.

THIS IS A COVER-UP OF A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEE'S CRIMINAL ACTIONS . BY THE "SUPPOSED" INVESTIGATIVE ARM OF THE DOJ.

IF YOU COULD PUT YOUR "FINDINGS" IN WRITING, THAT COULD REFUTE MY TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY, YOU WOULD HAVE.

YOU CAN'T AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW IT DON'T YOU?

THE VERY FACT THAT AGENTS FROM YOUR OFFICE, WHEN CONTACTED BY ME VIA THE DOJ-OIG's 1-800 NUMBER; MISDIRECT, DISCONNECT, AND GENERALLY DEFLECT EVERY ATTEMPT THAT I HAVE MADE TO LEARN THE STATUS OF MY COMPLAINT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT YOUR ACTIONS, MUCH LIKE FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN'S CAN NOT STAND THE LIGHT OF DAY, PUBLIC SCRUTINY, OR THE RULE OF LAW.

NOR HAS YOUR CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED, SACRED OATH SWORN DUTY TO: "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE LAWS OF THIS LAND FROM ALL ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN, AND DOMESTIC." BEEN HONORED.

I ADD YOU TO MY COMPLAINT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS AGAINST MY PERSON BY A DOJ EMPLOYEE.

I WILL TAKE IT UP WITH THOSE OF THIS NATION WITH OVERSIGHT AND CORRECTIVE POWERS OVER THE DOJ AS RELATES TO YOUR "OFFICIAL" (what a joke) ACTIONS.

SORRY 'BOUT YOUR BAD LUCK.

NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I SEEN A MORE MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE COLLECTION OF WORTHLESS STONEWALLING INDIVIDUALS AS EVIDENTLY POPULATES THE DOJ-OIG.

I BET CONGRESS CAN, AND WILL "THIN OUT THE HERD" (HEY! IT'S NATURES WAY!) AT THE DOJ-OIG.

HOW STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE ANYWAY?

*** THE TRUTH DOESN'T BEND KNEE TO LIE.
(it's you people who can't face the facts and have been in hiding for almost a year and a half. That's gonna come to an end real soon!)

*** I WILL LEGALLY, AND LAWFULLY COME AFTER EVERY MEMBER OF THE DOJ THAT HAS BEEN "FOULING" THEIR OWN NEST" (ie. Aiding and abbetting those from within the DOJ ranks that are committing criminal acts in the name of the Law.)

*** I DON'T QUIT. I HATE LIARS. I PLAY TO WIN, AND USUALLY DO.

I would take a long sober look at the mountain of verifiable evidence that can, and will lead to indictable charges of the most severe in nature against anyone and everyone on the downside of the evidentiary paper trail.

You will quickly realize that all who have "signed off" on blocking this matter from a fair and impartial review of my allegations and evidence by those within the DOJ's investigative arm, the OIG are in a legally untenable position.

*** We won't even go into the complete absence of anything like moral, or ethical behavior exhibited by anyone within the DOJ-OIG as concerns this matter, beyond this stark truth evidenced by your employees EVERY action;

"THIS PRESENT OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS COMPLETELY DEVOID OF ANY ETHICAL STANDARDS, AND BOUNDRIES.

YOU HAVE WANDERED DOWN THAT DARK ROAD THAT IS TAKEN BY THOSE THAT ARE MORALLY BANKRUPT.

*** YOU HAVE BECOME THAT WHICH HAS NO BOTTOM TO HOW LOW YOU WILL GO TO ADVANCE THE AIMS OF THE LAWLESS, AND THE LIE, THAT IS AT BATTLE WITH THE LAW AND WHAT IS TRUE.

ANYONE WHO WOULD DO THIS IS A FOOL.

DO YOU THINK THAT YOU CAN CONTROL THE INVESTIGATIVE OFFICE OF THE DOJ, SO THAT YOU'LL HAVE A FREE HAND TO DO SUCH THINGS AND NOT SUFFER THE FULL FURIOUS WRATH, AND DESERVED PENALTY THAT THE SPIRIT OF JUSTICE WILL DEMAND?

AND ENTERTAIN NO DOUBT ABOUT THIS; JUSTICE WILL EXACT THE PRICE IN FULL FROM THOSE THAT SWEAR THEIR LOYALTY TO JUSTICE, ONLY SO THAT THEY CAN COME NEAR ENOUGH TO TAKE DEADLY AIM AT BOTH THE LEGAL MANIFESTATION, AS WELL AS THE "SPIRIT" OF JUSTICE ?

*** I SWEAR THIS TO YOU NOW. EVEN IF I LOSE, YOU WON'T WIN. ***

EVERYONE THAT READS A PAPER IN THIS COUNTRY IS GONNA KNOW YOUR NAMES.

WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE.

HOW MORALLY BANKRUPT YOU ALL ARE AS INDIVIDUALS.

AND THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY ARE GONNA HOWL FOR YOUR WORTHLESS PROFFESSIONAL HIDE TO BE TANNED, AND TACKED UP IN PUBLIC.

*** GUESS WHAT? CONGRESS WILL OBLIGE.

You have just been served notice;

"YOU WILL BE WEIGHED ON THE TRUE SCALES OF JUSTICE"

GRAB IT AND GROWL.

GLEN MICHAEL WILSON

FREE THE TRUTH - CHAIN THE LIE

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.

IN DEFENSE OF THE LAWS OF THIS NATION AND STATE I WILL CONTINUE TO BATTLE ALL OF THOSE WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT ARE LAWLESS, AND FAITHLESS SERVANTS OF THE LAW.

UNTIL THE DAY THAT I SEE YOU CHARGED WITH CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY DUE PROCESS, AND CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.

THESE CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME UNDER THE COLOR OF AUTHORITY.

YOU WILL ANSWER TO THE LAW. WHAT WILL YOU SAY?
*************************************** *****

As you can tell by the tone of this request by me to the Department Of Justice- Office Of The Inspector General, to get off their ass, I am getting fed up with what by this time is blatant stone walling on their part.

CAN YOU BLAME ME?
*************************************** *************************************** **

WED., AUGUST, 24th, 2005

TO: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE-OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
FROM: GLEN MICHAEL WILSON
SUBJECT: COMPLAINT ADDITION OF: "CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS BY A DOJ EMPLOYEE". (FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN, VENTURA CA. BRANCH)

THIS IS AN ADDITION TO MY 18 MONTH OLD COMPLAINT OF MY CIVIL LIBERTIES BEING VIOLATED BY A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEE. ( FBI AGENT, MICHAEL TEMPLIN, VENTURA CALIF. BRANCH)

THIS IS THE FOURTEENTH, OR FIFTEENTH COMPLAINT ADDITION THAT I HAVE SENT TO YOUR OFFICE.

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE AT ALL FROM THE DOJ-OIG AS TO RECIEPT OF MY COMPLAINT.

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE BY THE DOJ- OIG AS TO MY REPEATED QUERIES AS TO THE; "STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATION"

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE FROM YOUR OFFICE AS TO; "WHO IS THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER?" AND; "HOW CAN I CONTACT HIM?"

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE FROM THE OIG TO MY QUERY; "WHERE DO I SEND THE THE COURT RECORDS, PHOTOS, AND NAMES, AND ADDRESSES OF WITNESSES, THAT MAKE UP THE EVIDENCE OF DOJ EMPLOYEE, FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN'S CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS AGAINST MY PERSON?"

***WITHOUT ANYONE FROM YOUR OFFICE RESPONDING TO MY PLEAS FOR HELP, GETTING THE FBI BRANCH IN VENTURA CALIF., AND THE FBI BRANCH IN LOS ANGELES, CALIF. TO ALLOW ME TO FILE A FORMAL WRITTEN COMPLAINT OF; "DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO; DUE PROCESS, AND DENIAL OF MY RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW." AGAINST THE VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PERSONEL THAT; "CONSPIRED TO DENY ME MY CIVIL LIBERTIES PROTECTIONS, UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW."

*** HAVE YOU NO INTEREST IN SUCH HIGH CRIMES?

*** IS THIS JUST "BUSINESS AS USUAL?

*** IF YOU ARE SO SURE THAT MY ALLEGATIONS ARE BASELESS, (OR FOOLISHLY BELIEVE THAT THIS PRETENSE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A CREDIBLE DEFENSE AT YOUR TRIAL) REFUTE THEM.

THAT SHOULD BE SIMPLE ENOUGH FOR YOUR OFFICE, WHICH IS CHOCK FULL OF SOME OF THE FINEST LEGAL MINDS IN THIS COUNTRY.

***YOU CAN USE THIS WEALTH OF LEGAL TALENT TO ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH OF THIS MATTER IN LESS THAN AN HOUR, IF AFTER 18 MONTHS OF STICKING YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND, (OR, HAS IT BEEN SOMEWHERE ELSE ALL THIS TIME?) YOU ARE OF A MIND TO FINALLY DO YOUR JOB, WHICH IS TO INVESTIGATE. ISN'T IT?

***OR, YOU CAN USE THE ENTIRE BUILDING FULL OF STEEL TRAP LEGAL MINDS TO STAVE OFF THE INEVITIBLE, IGNOBLE ENDING OF YOUR PROFFESSIONAL CAREER, FOR A SHORT WHILE LONGER.

***ASK THEM FOR THEIR LEGAL OPINION AS TO JUST HOW UNTENABLE YOUR SITUATION IS FROM A LEGAL/CRIMINAL, POLITICAL, ETHICAL, PUBLIC RELATIONS, POSTER CHILD OF A SOCIAL PARIAH KIND OF STAND POINT.

I'M SURE THAT BETWEEN THE PIE CHARTS, GRAPHS, TEA LEAVES, AND OUIJA BOARD, THEY WILL FIND A WAY TO CONVEY ADEQUATELY TO YOU JUST HOW BIG A LOAD OF BAD STINK YOU'RE WALKING AROUND WITH IN YOUR SHORTS.

YES I SAID; "YOU HAVE A BIG LOAD OF BAD STINK IN YOUR SHORTS. " IT'S BEEN THERE FOR OVER 18 MONTHS ALREADY.

BY GOD MAN! CLEAN YOUR SELF UP!

***ONCE AGAIN!
I REQUEST FROM THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL THE FOLLOWING;

1. STATUS OF MY COMPLAINT.

2. PROGRESS, (IF ANY) OF THE INVESTIGATION.

3. NAME OF THE INVESTIGATING AGENT/OFFICER.

4. HOW TO CONTACT HIM. (INVESTIGATING OFFICER)

5. WHERE, AND TO WHO DO I SEND THE EVIDENTIARY MATERIAL; VENTURA SUPERIOR COURT TRANSCRIPTS, DOCKET ENTRIES, (ALL 1,207 OF THEM), PHOTOS, AND WITNESS NAMES THAT ANY SELF RESPECTING INVESTIGATOR WOULD WANT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF. WOULDN'T HE?

6. ASSISTANCE FROM THE DOJ-OIG IN GETTING THE VENTURA CALIF., AND LOS ANGELES CALIF., BRANCHES OF THE FBI TO LIFT THE BLOCK THAT DOJ EMPLOYEES HAVE PLACED ON MY BEING ALOWED TO FILE A FORMAL COMPLAINT, LISTING MY ALLEGATIONS OF NUMEROUS OFFICERS OF THE VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, COMMITTING MULTIPLE COUNTS OF; "CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY DUE PROCESS, AND EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW", WITH THE "SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK" ENHANCEMENT OF; "UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW"

7. DO YOUR JOB. INVESTIGATE. THIS ONE IS EASY.

EVERY ONE IN OXNARD THAT I HAVE SHOWN JUST THE COURT GENERATED EVIDENCE "GETS" WHAT IS HAPPENING IN A MATTER OF MINUTES.

YOU WON'T HAVE ANY TROUBLE. THAT IS, UNLESS YOU WON'T HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY.

OH, AND TAKE A LONG SHOWER. USE LOTS OF SOAP. AND CHANGE THEM SHORTS STINKY!


AS ALWAYS,
SINCERELY
GLEN MICHAEL WILSON

FREE THE TRUTH. - CHAIN THE LIE.

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.

I'M SOME DUMB, NOT PLUMB DUMB.

STILL ALIVE FOR NOW. NO THANKS TO YOU




Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!



Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

OXNARD POLICE PROVIDE COVER FOR EXECUTION STYLE SLAYING.

Wrong man killed right after my release from Patton. At my place of employment.

I was released from Patton shortly after my 60 day evaluation. Which is about as quick as anyone gets a finding of incompetency turned around.
Judge Cloninger, and my faithless as Judas Iscariot himself, public pretender, Randy Tucker, I am sure figured that shortly after my arrival at Patton, I would;
" Start demanding that people listen." Or better yet, start threatening all kinds of adverse legal consequences.
In either instance, they probably envisioned me; "Raising my voice, shouting in wild eyed outrage. Pounding my fist on the nurses station ledge...
And quickly and quietly being approached from behind by two or three psych techs. That would body slam me to the ground, where one of them would drop with all of his weight on to the small of my back with a knee, while another would keep my arms from flailing about, and the third would pull a "ready to go" injection of enough of something strong enough to drop a rogue elephant in its tracks.
Something that will reduce the patient to a drooling, piss soaked mostly immobilized, wheel-chair restrained puddle of humanity that can only mumble things like; "My mouth is dry." for the next two to three days.
And once a person has an "incident" in their patient records. That person has a HISTORY.
And once you have a history. Well...They need to "hold you longer. And evaluate where all of this anger is coming from. They'll want to "try" several different mood, and let's not forget, mind altering combinations of drugs. Just to get an idea as to which one achieves the most encouraging results.
And after they get you on the daily heavy duty mind and body tranquilized combo drug conga line of despair, it isn't long before there is another incident. Then another. And if, or when, what ever is left of you is "allowed" to leave their facility/program/lower level hub of Hell, You have a HISTORY that leaves with you.
I know that this sounds way too melodramatic to be real. As in "actually going on." But I saw what I just related to you shortly after my arrival at Patton. And I witnessed the repeat of this structured little psych ballet between patients and staff numerous times in the 75 days that I was at Patton for; "Treatment, and evaluation.
All I can truthfully relate to you is this;
There is no treatment.
There is no evaluation.
You are what ever that commitment paper says you are. Nothing more, or less.
At my 60 day evaluation, which is the first time that everyone who was assigned to me and my particular mental health problem gets together and comes to some kind of agreement as to exactly how the states determined intention of skinning your psychological cat is going to be accomplished.
With great pains taken to conjure up the illusion of a process that endeavors to be humane and helpful.
But the illusion is necessary because no one who has chosen "Mental Health" as their profession is willing to put the truth into words as relates to what they do. Which is this;
Drugging as many mentally disabled (problem) people as possible, so completely, by the use of unbelievably debilitating drugs, that none of them would be able to effectively document, describe and convey to others the Stephen King wide eyed nightmare that our mental health system has become.
Mans inhumanity to man, gussied up to look like compassionate care and concern.
Institutionalized inhumanity to man.
But at my 60 day evaluation, they chose to "punt" instead of run with the ball, or pass me off to another wing. Another process. Another mental management mantra.
When I walked into the room. As soon as I sat down, I was asked; "What are you doing here?"
I had repeatedly, but in a non emotional, non insistent manner related my blues and hard luck tale of woe to each and every person in that room. Some more than once, or twice. So my response at that moment was this;
"You have no idea how much that I wish that I had a more believable truth to relate to you, as to why I was sent here." Unfortunately, this is the only truth I have."
Then the lead psychologist said; "We're sending you back. With our finding that you are competent to stand trial."
So I was transferred back to Ventura County Jail 15 days later. Where I am sure no one was expecting to see me for a long time.
And much like that old Irish prayer; "May you be in Heaven an hour before the Devil knows your dead." My return to Ventura County Jail, was followed by my immediate release from it.
Because I had O.R. (waiver of bail) on all charges, when I was remanded to custody, and sent to Patton. With my competency restored, my O.R. releases were as well.
I WAS GIVEN A COURT DATE TWO WEEKS IN THE FUTURE AND RELEASED.
Before any members of the judicial/prosecutorial/advocate cut-throat crew that had done this to me even knew that I was back from Hell.
**************************************************
NOW THIS OATH FORSAKEN, CUT-THROAT CREW HAS REAL PROBLEMS.
I'M BACK.
NO HISTORY.
COMPETENCY RESTORED.
QUICKER THAN THEY EVER THOUGHT WOULD BE POSSIBLE.
I layed low, completely out of sight, until I reported to court as ordered two weeks later. I had a couple of friends with me. It was in and out. I only got one thing accomplished that day. But it was the one thing I wanted most right then. I relieved myself of that morally bankrupt, worthless, souless, rat bastard poster child of every bad lawyer joke there ever was. Randy Tucker.
Now I was pro per again. I had regained my right to speak in my own legal defense again. They were scared shitless.
Then, my plan was to drop off the map again for another three weeks. Until March 29th, 2004. The next date the court assigned for the start of my jury trial.
I was never more of a threat to this nest of vipers than I was at this period of time.
With my right to speak in my own legal defense restored. I could bring up, on the record, the allegations of misconduct I had brought against the prosecution.
I could bring up on the record, how judge Cloninger had illegally moved the disposition of my case forward before convening a misconduct hearing to see if my allegations had merit.
I could bring up on the record how judge Cloninger had illegally and coercively attached the condition of giving up my right to speak in my own self defense to his changing a "no bail" warrant into a waiver of bail O.R. release.
I could bring up on the record how the first words out of the mouth of the pre-positioned, pre-determined public defender, that I was forced to take as counsel if I wanted out of jail were to request a competency hearing.
I could bring up how judge Cloninger had ignored the evidence/letter of the Ventura County Sheriffs Dept. Legal Unit Head, E. Hobin, that stated that on May 28, 2003, a block was placed on my being let out of my cell to be in court for the third derailed start of my jury trial. That she could not get lifted.
I had been hiding out on Silver Strand Beach. At a friends house. Another friend, Debbie Castillo, rented a room there as well.
She was the cashier at the Channel Islands Liquor Store. In the shopping center where all of this craziness transpired.
Suddenly, not too long after my first court date after my release from Patton, when I relieved myself of counsel. Debbie is arm robbed twice in eight days. By two completely different robbers.
No cashier at this liquor store in twenty years has ever been arm robbed. Then twice in eight days.
To this day, Niether one of them has been identified.
Then the owner of the liquor store. Pete Nebrek tells Debbie to; "Ask Mikey if he will come to the store with you on the nights that you work, and I will pay him to be your security."
The hairs on the back of my head started standing up when she told me that Pete had suggested this scenario. Because I had tied him into an earlier "trick bag" that these nut jobs had hoped that I would jump into.
But Debbie was my friend. And she was crying, and saying that she really needed to keep this job, but couldn't bring herself to work there any longer, unless there was some one with her at night.
So I said O.K.
I worked with her the next two nights. Then she was off for two days, and so was I.
The first night that both of us were off. A man was shot, execution style, (five rounds to the head and chest) as he took one step out side the door to the store.
There was a shooter. And there was a spotter. They each had a their own "get-away" car. They each had a driver.
The spotter went into the store, while the shooter paced back and forth, just outside the front door. Looking in to the store each time he walked past the door.
The spotter, it appears was to "designate" who was supposed to be shot, by some visible, and possibly audible cue, of recognition.
I believe that the spotter was supposed to give these cues/signs etc. when he saw me.
But I was off that night. And besides Pete, the owner, there was only one other person in the store.
Danial Alizar Hernandez.
And the spotter didn't give the cues/signals/signs for the shooter to lock onto.
But Danial Alizar Hernandez did.
When he turned away from the counter to leave the store, he recognized the spotter. They evidently had been/were on, good terms. Because when he recognized the spotter, he reached out, and took his hand, and said something like "Hey! What's up?"
I know this, because it is all on the video.
The shooter, walking back and forth just outside the door, looks in, and sees the acknowledgment/sign/cue/go-ahead.
Danial Alizar Henandez takes one step outside the front door, and takes five rounds to the head and chest.
When the shooting starts. Pete ducks down behind the counter. The spotter ducks down on his side. He hears the "bing, bing, bing" of Pete making a call on his cell phone.
The spotter then stands up, and reaches over the counter, and down to where Pete is trying to make call. He grabs the phone out of Pete's hand and hunkers down again. He then either makes a call using Pete's phone, or pretends as if that is what he is doing.
Mean while, the shooter gets into the passenger side of his get away ride. And they head out of the parking lot towards Hemlock St. with tires screaming. Reaching Hemlock, they hang a left and disappear into the night.
The driver for the spotter is a woman. Because she is heard by Pete, and even some people over at Champs Sports Bar screaming over and over, at the top of her lungs; "Get in the car! Get in the fucking car!"
Where upon, he runs outside, and does exactly that. He gets in the fucking car!
Now this get away driven vehicle is laying rubber, and fish tailing its way out the other exit from this parking lot. On to Victoria Ave. North bound.
Like the two previous armed robbers. The shooter and the spotter are never identified.
But all of this, part fact, part supposition extrapolation of events that I view as being meant for me, might or might not be true.
While it might "possibly" be a mixed signals fuck-up between the spotter, and the shooter. It could have as easily been some "bad blood, gang related, "payback is a bitch" type convergence of events.
Except for these two factual additions to the events that night; And the basic and simple logic and reason trails that this additional information would take you down.
I found some one who saw an Oxnard Police Dept. patrol car parked just across the street from the shooting. With a clear view of what transpired.
This person was sober, not a flake, and had worked for the Oxnard School District for twenty-three years. Here is what he relayed to me. Almost two months after the shooting.
There was one Oxnard P.D. patrol car parked on Hemlock St. Just before Anchor St. approx. 70 yards away from the shooting. With a clear view of the front door of the liquor store. And what went on there.
And when the shooter's get away vehicle sped out of the parking lot at a high rate of speed, tires squealing, he didn't budge. Even though they would have only been thirty, to forty yards directly in front of his patrol car when they did so.
He didn't respond to the shooting victim. He didn't give chase to the shooter's get away vehicle.
It was as if he was there in case some; "John Q. Public", concerned citizen saw what went down, and then hopped into his vehicle to give chase.
If that happened. This officer was perfectly positioned to be right on the back bumper of said hypothetical concerned citizen, with his lights flashing and his siren playing the pull over blues.
Only having to get involved with the aftermath of this shooting if said hypothetical concerned citizen became in actuality, a real one. Which didn't happen. So he continued to do nothing for a few more minutes. Then slowly drove away.
But IF the "hypothetical" person, became a real person; All he would have to do is hold this hypothetical/real guy at the curb for 30- to 60 seconds. Then speed off! Like he is on a mission!
When in fact, his mission had just been accomplished.
Here is the other factual addition;
About eight months after the shooting, I ran into the waitress that worked the kitchen at Champs Sports Bar. She had been taking out a garbage bag to the dumpster at the exact moment that Danial Hernandez was gunned down.
She wasn't my friend, and I had no idea that she was out side, in the parking lot at that moment. On the day that I learned this, she was talking to one of her friends, who told her that; "I only come over here to this liquor store, during the daytime. Ever since that guy was killed in front of it."
To this, Amber (the waitress at Champs) replied; "I don't blame you." I was outside in the parking lot at the time of the shooting. Taking out the garbage bag from the kitchen."
Then she tells her friend; "I still can't believe that there was a police car parked on Hemlock,
AND ANOTHER ONE PARKED BETWEEN THE GAS PUMPS AT THE CHEVRON STATION WHEN THIS HAPPENED AND NEITHER ONE OF THEM DID ANYTHING"
I mean, before I could even feel a little elated that I had found an independent verification of the patrol car that was parked on Hemlock St. She lets loose with the double whammy mind fuck factoid of another, completely different police car.
Nestled between the gas pumps of the Chevron gas station.
Which is located right at the corner of walk and don't walk. Which in this instance means, Hemlock and Victoria.
I then asked her to tell me in which direction was the patrol car facing. Her response was; Towards her.
Which meant that when the spotters get away car sped out of the parking lot after the shooting, turning north on to Victoria Ave. This police car, like the one that was parked on Hemlock, was perfectly positioned to jump right out on to Victoria Ave and be right on the back bumper with lights and siren going of anyone that might have attempted to give chase to this get away vehicle.
Like the first patrol car, only having to "get involved" with the shootings aftermath IF some private citizen attempted to accomplish what it appears that the police were there to make sure wasn't accomplished.
I don't believe that Danial Alizar Hernandez had ever been a threat to those that controlled Law's power, and authority, not to mention those huge stacks of the highest denomination greenbacks in Ventura County.
But I was.
I had become the legal equivalent of a knife at the throat of not just some of the county's richest and most powerful individuals. I was a knife at the throat of these people's entire corporate rape, pillage, and plunder consortium.
A little over two weeks earlier, I had rid myself of my court appointed muzzle.
Daniel Alizar Hernandez was murdered. Execution style. On March 9th, 2004.
My fifth jury trial date was set to begin on March 29th, 2004.
Desperate people do desperate things.
I really need to know if Danial Alizar Hernandez is carrying my stone.
If he is. Then I must carry his until it marks the spot where the legal equivalent of a fire breathing dragon was finally slayed.
Or until it marks the spot where I fell in pursuit of that.
Post script to this part. March 29th, 2004.
As soon as I made it past the x-ray machine, and into the "Hall of Just Us" judge Cloninger, who was the head cheesy weasel that had put me through this, pretended as if he "accidentally" bumped into me.
He looked up, at me with what I could tell was a forced grin. And as our eyes locked, he said; "Mister Wilson. You're back!"
My grin wasn't the real deal either. But I was a lot better at making it look like it was.
They had no idea where I had been for the last two weeks. Who I had talked with. What might result.
In actuality, I had been unable to enlist anyone's interest or support. That goes with the territory of a finding of incompetency. It doesn't matter that it was restored.
But I wanted this crew to think that I was holding a hand full of aces. So I grinned at Cloninger as if nothing gave me more pleasure than seeing that he was still here.
I kept my eyes on his, and my grin was ear to ear as I replied;
Yeah. I'm back. And I will be the only person in that court room today that has a certified paper that says I'm not crazy."
His grin fled his face only slightly faster than he scurried out of the main lobby.
As I approached the double doors to the court room, I saw my prosecutorial adversary, senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, standing just outside of them. She wouldn't look up at me at all.
As I walked past her and her little covey of minions and gophers I said; "Let's get this dog and pony show on the road. I'm the dog. Who's the pony?"
She never entered the court room that day. My sixth jury trial date was set for April 15th, 2004.
For the first time, during this whole convoluted battle royale, with this crazier than a shit-house rat dark force cabal of seriously cheesy weasels, I could see, and smell the fear coming off of these creatures.
This was extremely gratifying to know that I wasn't the only one who was feeling waves of fear washing over me from time to time. I was coming out of my terror zone.
They were just stepping into theirs.
****************************************************************

THE REGION

Man Slain Outside Oxnard Store

By Holly J. Wolcott
Times Staff Writer

March 11, 2004

A 28-year-old man was shot and killed in a gang-related attack outside an Oxnard liquor store Tuesday night, police said.

Daniel Alizar Hernandez of Oxnard was shot several times after leaving Channel Islands Liquor in the 3700 block of Hemlock Street, Oxnard Police Cmdr. Bryan MacDonald said. Hernandez, who was found sprawled on a sidewalk, died at the scene.

According to surveillance video from inside the liquor store and an employee's account, Hernandez walked out of the store and had an argument with a man who was waiting on the sidewalk.

(Bullshit. My addition to this story g.m.w.)

The man fired at Hernandez several times and then ran off, MacDonald said.

(bullshit; He was driven off. My addition to this story g.m.w.)

The store's surveillance tape did not capture the argument or the killer's face, but detectives believe there were several witnesses, including another customer inside the liquor store who left after the shooting.

Although the exact motive remains sketchy, evidence gathered at the scene, as well as several gang tattoos on Hernandez's body, have led detectives to label the case as gang-related.

The homicide is the city's fifth this year.



6 comments:

chief said...
Okay, let's make this a little simpler for me: what is the narrative, exactly?

1) You identify a toxic waste spill under a shopping mall/plaza

1a) presumably (I haven't gotten to this part yet) you bring awareness of the spill to the proper authorities (EPA, board of health and safety, whoever--a relevant government agency, in any case).

2) Tiger, worried about the lawsuits that might follow from general, public knowledge of the spill, elects to shut you down.

2a) by planting drugs on you, and hence ruining your credibility.

3) You go to court, and no one believes that the drugs were planted on you. Stubbornly, you keep insisting on your story, despite the fact that it would be inordinately difficult to prove that an officer of the law would ever stoop to planting drugs on a private citizen.

3a) you more or less stop co-operating with the legal system because it's become obvious to you that they're all in the pay of this multi-million dollar real-estate consortium.

3b) this lack of co-operation eventually results in you being hospitalized for an unspecified mental illness.

Is that about right? Please fill in the missing gaps of my chronology.
Glen Michael Wilson said...
Hey Chief,

Chronology:
(1.) Over a two plus year period (1999-2001)of working at, and living near this shopping center at Victoria Ave, and Hemlock St., in west Oxnard, Ca.;

(A.) I see an assortment of activities, and actions, and policy changes as relates to Tiger's dealings with the merchants that lease store fronts from them.

(A1.) Actions, activities, and lease agreed upon policy changes that are initiated by the property owners, and their agents that are clearly designed to drive out the merchants that have rented store front from Tiger for over twenty years.

(A2.) Over this two year period, these activities, actions, and policy changes begin pointing to a possible, to plausible reason as to why Tiger's owners would deliberately run such a huge commercial cash magnet into the ground.

(A3) In August, 2001 I relate to three of the merchants at this shopping center, (two of which I was working for, and another that I had worked for previously) and about the same number of locals that live near by;

*All that I saw, heard, and read that led me to believe that Tiger's owners had liability for a long term, massive, toxic chemical contamination of the ground water in west Oxnard.

*I also related to these people that Tiger's owners strategy to effectively avoid liability appeared to be as follows;

*Slowly, over a period of a couple of years, remove the merchants from the property.

*Doing so, one at a time, at a merchant's lease renewal negotiations. So that as little attention to what is going on as possible is created.

*Accomplished by; Un-meetable demands for a monthly rent of five times the going rate for the same square footage, anywhere in the county.

*Then; Bring down the shopping center. And haul away the leaking, corroded tank beneath the dry-cleaners, and the concrete containment structure that they built around it, during the mis-stated "repairs" in 1999.

* Factor in the "slight, but constant push, inland" of contamination blooms in west Oxnard, that is the result of the proximity to the immense pressures of the Pacific Ocean, pushing through west Oxnard's "loose and sandy soil."

IF: There is no corroded, toxic chemical containment tank on Tiger's property.

AND IF: There is no toxic chemical trail leading back on to Tiger's property.

THEN: There is no tens of millions of dollars in direct liability assigned to Tiger's owner's for the cost of the ground water, and soil remediation.

AND MORE IMPORTANTLY: Tiger's owners are not subject to the lawsuits that hundreds of seperate home owners would be filing against Tiger's owners.

Each of these home owners would be hiring different lawyers and lawfirms, that would each immediately place liens on all of Tiger's considerable assets.

*Including the hundreds of millions of dollars that Tiger's "limited partner investors"
have invested in Tiger's commercial property holdings.

*Which includes an undetermined (by me) number of millions of dollars of City of Oxnard, City of Ventura, and County of Ventura employee pension funds monies.

*That would be litigated out of existence, before all of the liens against Tiger's owners, and their limited partner investors were finalized. Ten, fifteen, or twenty plus years down the road.

IF TIGER WAS UNABLE TO AVOID LIABILITY.

(A4.) I classify this toxic chemical spill as; "Long term, and massive" based on these facts;

*This was a large, high volume dry-cleaners. That daily would have had to store a considerable amount of of the used, processed, petroleum distillate, and man made solvents, as well as heavy metals used by this industry. Until they could be transferred to an acceptable disposal site.

*This cleaners was open from eight a.m. in the morning, until seven p.m. at night. Six nights a week.

*The operators of this dry-cleaners
had leased this business from Tiger's owners for a period of more than five years, and less than seven, before the mis-stated "repairs" to a shifting foundation. That went under the cleaners to excavate two tractor trailer loads of the most highly contaminated soil that was nearest to the tank was under taken.

*High volume dry-cleaners
+
six days a week.
x's
52 weeks in a year,
x's
5 to 7 years,
eguals; "Long term, and massive."

(A5.) My defining of the chemical contamination as; "Toxic" is based upon the EPA's own classification of the solvents, and heavy metals used by the dry-cleaning industry.

*In official EPA reports, this toxic mixture has been referred to as a; "Witches brew of toxic chemicals."
********************
After relaying to these few people what I had learned, and what I suspected that Tiger's owners were up to, I went about my business.

I didn't call the EPA, or the media.

My reasoning was that the merchants, who had suffered losses in excess of a hundred thousand a year for two years should decide how this information would be best utilized.

What moved me from a suspicion that this was what Tiger's owners were up to, right on up to where this belief of mine solidified into
a core belief was this;

About one month after I relayed this information to a few individuals. My day to day existence changed in the blink of an eye.

I went from someone who had no adverse interactions with any police agency anywhere in over twenty years to some one who was;

Stopped;
Threatened;
Told to; "Shut the fuck up." And "Get the fuck out of town."

Two to three times a day.
Two to three times a night.
Everyday.
Everynight.

An Oxnard Animal Control officer, and truck was assigned to "follow" me and my two dogs. Three to four hours a day. Three to four days a week. For over six weeks.

Attempting to snatch my dogs, when ever I went into a store to buy something.

They finally went on to private property and untied them. Taking them to the pound.

It cost me 236 dollars to get them back.

Six weeks later, they went on to private property again. Untied my dogs, and took them to the pound.

This time, my fine was 444 dollars.

I had friends that worked at Ventura County Animal Control during this time period.

After the first theft of my dogs, and before they were stolen by Oxnard Animal control again, I ask them to see if they could find out who had convinced Lisa Jenkins, the head of Oxnard Animal Control, to assign an animal control officer, and truck, to following me, and twice stealing my dogs.

A few days before my dogs were stolen off of private property the second time, I recieved word from one of my county animal control friends as to how Lisa Jenkins was convinced to "sign on" to twice becoming a "dog-napper"

The Oxnard Police Dept.'s west Oxnard, day shift watch commander,
(he assigns all patrol duties to Oxnard police officers in west Oxnard.) Went to Lisa Jenkins with this Shit-stained sack of lies;

He told her;
"There is this alcoholic, drug addicted, agressive panandler that is hanging out in west-Oxnard."

"He has two dogs, that he doesn't give a rat's ass about, but when he panhandles, he drags them along.
Because they ellicit sympathy from the public. Which increases the amount of money that he is gien. Which he them uses to buy drugs, and alcohol."

"When he is done panhandleing, he ties up the dogs somewhere, usually without food, or water. Then takes off to party. Sometimes, not returning to the dogs for a day, or longer."

Well, based upon a report such as this, if it were even with in the city limits of being true, I'd sock myself in the eye.

Here is what is true.

If I have two, or three beers in A MONTH. I'm cutting a fat slice off of the hog.

I don't panhandle. I never have. Some people are OK with doing so. I'm not.

I live by the sweat of my brow. I'm fine with that.
I don't get food stamps.
I don't recieve a govt. check.

If I broke my leg, and couldn't fend for myself, for a month or two, then I would go sign up for something like that.

For the month or two that I could legitimately convinve myself that the aid was warranted

As for the care of my two dogs.

I loved them. They loved me. We were together 24/7. They never wanted for food, water, love.

Which was why after 6 weeks of trying to come upon my dogs while I was gone, they never did.

Finally having to go onto private property, to illegally steal them in both instances.

As for my drug usage; I have done meth before. I will do so again.

My monthly "intake" is snorting up a 10- to 15 dollar line of the shizzit, once a week.

Some weeks (about one a month) I am actually able to afford to snort up two lines.

I don't play games with the truth. I have no right to complain about others being free and easy with what is true, if I am willing to do the same.

I don't see myself as some noble creature, that is a defender of all that is right and proper against the predations of all that is wrong and evil.

That is because I am not anywhere close to that, and I know that I will always fall way short of that mark.

I am as fractured and as flawed as anyone that you will ever meet.

I have my; Tendencies, inclinations, penchants, interests, habits, obsessions, fears, delusions, false beliefs, and all the other negative, and most likely unhealthy personality traits that everyone is loaded up with.

By both the failures of our nurture and the nature of this existence.

But having said that;

I know when some one is pissing on my leg.

My ability to use the mental tools of basic logic, and reason, while not extraordinary, have been assessed by most people that I encounter as slightly better than average.

I am more than willing to give up a cherished belief, if you can show an unbroken thread of facts that add up to a valid deduction.
************************
Number 3: of your initial assessment is off in this respect.

I go to court and it isn't that "no one believes" my story.

It is that from out of the gate, the officers of Ventura Superior Court, that are a part of this county govt's "Quid pro quo, Dog and Pony show." know that it was/is a frame.

And my case has been assigned to;

Judges with in the Ventura Superior Court that are willing to negate the rule of law from the process. When ordered to do so.

The false charges will be prosecuted by deputy district attorneys that are aware that the illusion of due process has been called for. And not the reality of such. This particular crews specialty.

The advocacy (court appointed counsel) is there to make sure that nothing meaningful, gets into the court record, that is a detriment to the determined intent of this cut throat crew. Which is to insure that Justice will be denied in this instance.

If you think about it;

Out of the thousands of criminal and civil legal disputes that come before this county's state superior court each year, Very few of them would be "handled" in such a way.

There are probably less than a hundred cases a year where the "special team" of police, judges, prosecutors, and in criminal cases, advocates would be assembled.

Only those cases where a municipality, the county, or an agency from either, was at serious risk of having to make out a large pay out. For some litigatable fuck up.

Or, when that percentage of one percent, at the apex of financial, political, and social power with in this county are at risk of the same.

The rest of the cases, all but a handful, are played out by the established rules of law.

A defenents civil liberties rights and protections are in place, and obtainable.
*****************
A few cases. Lost in an immense shuffle.
************
As for number 3A.:

I never stopped co-operating with the court.

I made my court ordered appearances;

I never raised my voice, nor displayed a hostile attitude.

I wasn't the one in this process that set 17 jury trial dates.

And then derailed each one of them, when that day arrived, and these people had still been unable to secure my agreement to;
"take the deal."

My only "non-compliance" with the court's wishes was with their desire for me to stand silently still so that they could get on with my legal slaughter.

As for 3B: The reasons that judge Cloninger went this route, (finding of incompetence)
were these;

When I told him on June 3rd, 2003. On the record. In open court;

"I want to file two counts of misconduct against senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor."

"For twice lying to the court and the defense. To gain two unwarranted, and illegal delays to the start of my jury trial."

"Depriving me of my rights of due process, and equal protection under the law. Specifically, my right to speedy trial"

Right here, my case is supposed to be "frozen" in place. It can not move forward. Not one more motion, plea, request. Nothing.

And my case is to remain frozen in place

UNTIL THE MATTER OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT HAVE BEEN JUDGED TO BE TRUE OR FALSE.

And the way that I was going to show that my allegations of "criminal" misconduct by the prosecution were in fact True, would not be based upon some obscure legal point that would allow the judge to "fudge" the ruling.

It would be based soley on whether or not the prosecution could produce documentation that between April, 7th, 2003, and May 5th, 2003, they had indeed sent to North Carolina, for my 32 year old, involuntary manslaughter conviction records.

If they could produce documentation, to that effect, they were off the hook.

If they couldn't; (And they couldn't) then they lied to the court, and the defense, to gain two, unwarranted, illegal, delays to the start of my trial.

And in that instant, I would then;

"Move for dismissal. All counts. For cause."

And if judge Cloninger abided by the rule of law, my charges would have been "out the window" right there.

Because in cases where the prosecutions misconduct is of a more serious, criminal nature than what a defendent is charged with, then the charges are dropped.

Because the prosecution has lost the moral authority to point the states finger, accuse, and demand that justice's price be paid.
***********
But this is also the "shifting of the legal paradigm"

And by that I mean, that Once judge Cloninger decides that he isn't going to abide by the rule of law, and convene a misconduct hearing. He takes a big step accross that line they are supposed to never cross.

It's on the record. In the transcripts.

When he then decides to illegally, and coercively attach the condition of my giving up my right to speak in my own defense to his having my no bail warrant, turned into a "get out of jail free" waiver of bail, He moves his other foot clear accross that line as well.

When the pre-positioned, pre-picked shill of a lawyer that he forces me to take asks for a competency hearing with his very first words as my counsel; They are bot several miles down that "Road to Federal Prison Hell"
for about twenty years each if this ever makes it before the media.

Because the worst sin that an oath forsaken, morally bankrupt false servant of the law can make is to be caught being such a creature.

The rest of his kind will subject him to all manner of Hellish, indignities and miseries.

In the hopes of your not percieving that both the tortured miscreant that has been caught and his former bretheren of the legal profession, who have become his torturer differ only in this respect;

They haven't been caught yet.

Thanks for the interest and feed back.

gmw
chief said...
I need to confess a professional bias:

I worked in a homeless shelter in Boston for a couple of years. Many of the residents suffered from mental illnesses--some were obviously disturbed, others seemed more or less normal until you talked to them.

One guy who was pretty well put together used to manage the inventory of our clothing room. IT was great because none of the regular staff would have wanted to take on the job of sorting through the huge piles of donated clothing, separating them according to size, article, color, etc. He did a great job.

However, if you started a conversation with the guy, you shortly discovered that he didn't think of himself as homeless. He believed that he owned a beautiful brownstone apartment building on Marlborough St (a very upscale street in Boston's Back Bay), and that he was VOLUNTARILY homeless.

That is, this guy, Dave, thought that he was writing a sort of "Black Like Me" memoir about his experiences "posing" as a homeless guy--that living in the shelter was "research" for his book.

Nobody believed him.

Later on, when I worked as a psychiatric social worker, I had a guy on my caseload that I liked a lot, who didn't seem to have anything obviously wrong with him.

While he was a diagnosed schizophrenic, he had no symptoms in evidence. Sometimes, if medicated properly, you can get what looks like complete "remission" in a guy. Maybe this favorite client of mine was "over" his schizophrenia, and therefore ready to move into a more independent living situation.

I started moving heaven and earth to get this guy a job, a nice subsidized apartment, etc. but he kept saying, "you don't have to do all this--I don't think I'm ready." But I thought, nah, he's just underconfident, so I kept pushing him towards independence.

I should have listened to him: he ended up having a complete relapse, getting evicted from the apartment I got him, getting fired from the job I found him--the pressure of his freedom was just too much for him to handle.

Anyway, Glen, I'm telling you all this to explain where I'm coming from: based on professional experiences I've had with the mentally ill, I'm predisposed to believing that your story is the product of an elaborate self-sustaining delusion, rather than a dark plot to keep you silent.

I feel really bad telling you this, because it's clear that you need and want allies to believe in you--a very natural and human desire--but I don't, no matter how sympathetic I might be to your situation.

Still, you asked me to go over your "case" with occam's razor, and I've done that. Here are the biggest inconsistencies in the story:

1) It's not at all clear who would be liable for the spill. Wouldn't the dry-cleaners be responsible for the chemicals, since they're the ones who own them? I don't know the legalities here, but surely Tiger would attack the problem that way first--by shifting responsibility onto the owners of the dry cleaners.

1a) The spill doesn't seem that big. Even if we were talking about a 2000 gallon tank, that's a pretty small spill. It seems unlikely to present a huge public health threat , despite the loose composition of the local soil.

2) You didn't lodge a formal complaint to either the EPA or OSHA or anyone. This means that you never put yourself on Tiger's radar. If you never officially posed a threat to Tiger's interests, they'd have no reason to try and discredit you.

3)Most people, even if they were being set up, would be more concerned about how to make their legal problems go away, instead of "being heard". Even if Tiger was orchestrating all of you problems, the obvious solution is to say, "since I have no resources with which to effectively win this fight, I guess I should throw in the towel and think of my dogs." You, on the other hand, dismissed your own counsel, redoubling your efforts. Even if you aren't crazy, you certainly aren't practical.

3a) It costs money to harass and humiliate a guy--time and money. Tiger is a business first--that means that it isn't likely to waste money ruining the reputation of a guy who is already homeless: your good name, from a social perspective, is already ruined. To go to that much trouble to destroy your already dubious credibility is like paying money to ensure that the sun is going to rise tomorrow--a completely needless expense.

However, I will allow that there are sadists in the world--people who enjoy making people miserable for its own sake. Perhaps the people at Tiger get their jollies from picking on homeless guys. If so, you're really fucked, because they've got billions and you've nothing. Again, the logical solution is to pick up and leave, not to stand and fight.

4) originally, you claimed to have never had any trouble with the law, ever. Now you're telling me that you've got a 32 year-old involuntary manslaughter conviction. That's a big omission (it's also a heartbreaking one: I'm sorry that you've had to live with that. It must be tough. I feel very lucky that I've never accidentally killed anyone--because that could happen to anyone).

The deeper I go into your story, the thinner its substance. I'm sorry--I truly wish it were otherwise. It gives me absolutely no pleasure to render my verdict against you, but you asked for me to be straight with you, and so I am.

I hope your dogs are okay.
Glen Michael Wilson said...
Hey Chief,
Sorry I haven't responded to your post until now. I was in Mohave helping a friend get one of his rentals ready for occupancy.

As to the particulars of your latest post.

(1.) "It IS clear" who would have liability for the cost of clean-up and resultant (possible) damages to neighboring property values, health, etc.

It would be the owner of the property. It is a property's owner that bears resposibility for all structural deficiencies, and what ever adverse impact that these structural deficiencies might financialy burden any and all other property owners with.

(1a.) As I stated before; I have no way of ascertaining exactly how much, was the volume of the toxic chemical contaminents that escaped from this tank. Which was situated directly on top of the water table in west Oxnard.

But, we are talking the cumulative amount/effect of what ever the daily amount was times; six days a week; times 52 weeks out of the year; times 5 to 7 years. Before work was undertaken to seal the tank.

Also; These are the high end petroleum distillate solvents. Many of which will evaporate at room temp. in a matter of hours.

Man made solvents that have many of the same properties. And heavy metals. Like mercury. (remember the mad hatter?) That as I stated, have been described as a witches brew, by officials with the EPA.

(2.) Speaking of which; (the EPA) It was my poor use of language, and my bad habit of sometimes thinking that everyone is "up to speed" on my story, that caused me to ommit the following;

I did eventually report this to the EPA. Just not at the time that I related what I had learned to the merchants, and a few locals.

As I said; I initially figured that this was there fight, so I told them what I thought was up, and went about my business.

Also; What you imagined as my headlog, crazy impractical rush into the maw of this local billion dollar wood-chipper, was anything but.

I wasn't about to; "stir this pot" I just pointed out to a few merchants and locals that there appeared as if there was one.

I had a phone conversation with, Jennifer Youngberg, of the criminal investigation unit of the EPA. That lasted over an hour. It went nowhere that I know of.

I have filed a complaint with CAL-OSHA it has gone nowhere that I know of.

I attempted to enlist the aid of a local FBI agent. Michael Templin.
I had four phone conversations with him, that totaled over four hours.

The first conversation, which is outlined in; "What FBI agent Michael Templin was told."

And I elaborate further on my dealings with agent Templin in my narrative; "I finally meet FBI agent Michael Templin. (But don't know it.) Then we meet again."

I have also contacted, and filed a formal complaint against agent Templin with the Dept. of Justice-Office of the Inspector General.

Doing so through the DOJ's secure e-mail complaint filing portal. That can only be accessed via the DOJ's national web page.

To all of these "complaint filings"
Silence.

In each and every instance, I submitted my complaint through the agencies acceptable avenue for doing so.

I was civil. Concise. And I made sure that my complaint filing stayed with in the parameters of the investigative boundaries of each agency.

That not one of these agencies would even respond with the computer generated, form response letter, such as;

"We at the Dept of Justice take all complaints seriously...."

Is one of the most disturbing aspects of trying to get the word out.

I mean, think about it. If my complaint filing has no merit, push a key on your computer, that brings up the appropriate rejection of complaint letter, type in my name, and state the basis of my flawed reasoning.

That agency gets to add another cipher to their list of how many people "got it wrong" when they give their annual report to their congressional, and or senate oversight committee.

But what do you do if you can't refute the allegations?

Nothing.

Because if you falsly put in writing, that there is no basis to a person's allegations of wrong doing, when there is...

Now you're in the mix too.

(3.) When the pot started to boil, and Tiger's agents, and the local police started in on me, I did roll with the punches for the first three months.

Nobody in their right, or wrong mind, if you prefer, would want to get into a running battle with a whole cluster of fucked up cops.

Or with two guys that have more than enough disposable income to have you disposed of.

They stole my dogs twice, in the first two and a half months of this deal. (They stole them one more time later. I'll get to that)

I paid the $236, and another $444 six weeks later. And kept my mouth shut.

I was hoping that I could ride this out. And get back to a semblance of a normal life.

As for your comment; Even if you're not crazy. You are not being very practical.

My response to that is this;

I never said I wasn't crazy.
I said that I wasn't delusional.

As for practical; For the first three months I was so damn practical, I couldn't stand to look at myself in the mirror.

I gave ground. I gave way. I gave in. I gave up. From August, 2001 until December 27th, 2001.

That was when a police officer, in the town that I grew up in, palmed a bag of meth when he reached into my front pocket, and gave me a big shit eating grin when he opened his hand and said;

"Well look what we have here!"

Maybe you have never been pushed, again, and again. By people that keep popping up from out of nowhere, to load your day up with more misery.

In a fight where you are taking some serious lumps, and you have already tried giving way, giving ground, giving in, giving up.

And then someone pushes right up against your last nerve.

And even though you figure; "This is gonna hurt, real bad." You decide, that there isn't gonna be any more giving.

There isn't gonna be any more looking down, or away.

There isn't gonna be another day where you let something like that go slithering through your community without you calling out a warning.

Yes. It was crazy. No. It wasn't practical. But I can live with myself again.

(3A.) As for the dubious nature of my credibility; It is deemed as such mostly by people that don't know me.

Those that do, whether they care for my company, or not. Agree with my political/social/ philosophical
outlooks, or not, will by and large tell you, or anyone;

That I am;
Not known for mis-interpreting what I've seen, heard, read, or surmised. (I would add; On a regular basis)

Not known for lying, exaggerating, or embellishing a statement that he asserts to be true. (unless it is something akin to an overwieght lady asking me if she's putting on too much weight. Then I'll lie like a big dog!)

I don't deal.
I don't steal.
And if it wasn't for the continued aid of many in my home town, I'd be dead.

Except for this long term, public corruption conniption fit I'm caught up in, I have never leveled accusations like this before. Against any person. Or agency.

(NOTE: I don't entirely concur with my communities assessment of
my general nature. As I have already told you, I fall short of my own expectations of what I should be. But I keep heading towards that. Not away.)

As for my need, or desire to be believed. To hell with belief!

I'm looking for people that can read the case hearing docket entry sign.

Like a man hunting bear can read the sign and spoor of a rougue grizzly. That has to be brought down.

Belief requires a leap of faith. Save that for the religeous aspect
of your being.

Can you read the court records sign. If you can, it will unfold into a three dimensional construct of KNOWING. Not belief.

Belief is for people that don't have an abundance of facts.

My belief in God is the only thing I take on faith.

When hunting bear, especially a rogue Calif. Grizzly, you best know your animal. Its haunts. Habits. Tricks. And range.

If you can read legalese, then you can match what the court aknowledges as having happened, with what I assert happened as well. In my story narrative;

"17 jury trial dates derailed. By officers of the Ventura Superior Court."

You know that it is pretty blatant when a 10 year old kid who is reading the docket entries is heard to say every few minutes; "They can't do that!"

And he didn't even have the narrative to match it with!

With the court's own case hearing records to check off at each hearing, as to whether what I am relating is evidenced in the records.

If you do, then like everyone else that has done so, you will sit back and say something to the effect of;

Oh my fucking God! This is really going on.

I repeat; Like everyone else who has done so.

You see, I don't have any shortage of people around here that believe.
My neighbors have had a front row seat.

I had one lady tell me; "Damn! This is more drama than a Tele Novella!"

But until the media is willing to shine a big spotlight on the deal, no one's gonna put their neck on the block. And I don't blame them.
***********************
You wrote the following;
4) originally, you claimed to have never had any trouble with the law, ever. Now you're telling me that you've got a 32 year-old involuntary manslaughter conviction. That's a big omission.
******************
Here is what I wrote in my first respone, to your first post;
"I went from someone who had no adverse interactions with any police agency anywhere in over twenty years" to some one who was;

Stopped;
Threatened;
Told to; "Shut the fuck up." And "Get the fuck out of town."

How can you catogorize my telling you about the 32 year old manslaughter conviction as; "an ommission" when it is included in the very same post as the statement above?

I would submit that 32 years is way beyond; "More than twenty years."

This information was also prominently displayed and explained by me in; "My 17 jury trial dates derailed by officers of the Ventura Superior Court."

Which after the narrative about the shopping center, is the one that has all the court records verifiable stuff that goes with it.

I also dealt with my 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction in my narrative; "What FBI agent Michael Templin was told."

But here it is again;

I was eighteen years old. I was a paratrooper medic with the 82nd AIRBORNE (All the way!)

My best friend in the service, shot and killed a man off post. I was there. I gave him half of my monthly military pay to leave town on.

When questioned by the police the next day, I lied. Repeatedly. For over four hours.

He never left town. And was arrested. His girl friend had been told by him what happened.

I was given a 10 year, involuntary manslaughter sentence by the court for aiding and abetting; "To the fact." And; "after the fact."

The combination of two "tenses" of participation, as in; before/to;
to/after; or even; before/after constitutes the elevation of the charge.

I did six plus years. It could have been worse. I served the Lie.

I foolishly imagined that I could stand on the principal of helping my friend by way of an unprincipled action. Lying about a murder.

It cost me my marriage, and my son. As such actions often will.

It cost me my freedom. As it should have.

It broke my parents hearts. Which was my fault and no one elses.

It also gave me an extremely strong aversion to telling lies.

In my own way of thinking, I view "telling lies" With serving them.

I made a concious decision long ago to never serve the lie again.

Jumping ahead at this point, to deal with "my mental state; You are exactly right in this respect;

It all comes down to whether or not I am a person that is afflicted with a delusion that is so fixed, and entrenched, that neither reason, logic, or the evidence of my own eyes can wrench me free of an erroneous conclusion.

Or; As improbable as it seems, and I assure you, I have trouble to this day, wrapping my mind all the way around these events, what I am relating to you is in fact my day to day reality.

There is no middle ground on this one.

But that also means; That if YOU get it wrong. Your mind is afflicted with an erroneous belief, so firmly entrenched, that neither reason nor logic could wrench your mind free, from what is illusory.

Welcome to my world Chief.

So, I would ask you to rise above your bias, and dismantle my delusional beliefs, by the use of reason, and logic. If you can.

I promise to do my best to free you
from your firmly entrenched, erroneous beliefs as well my friend.

Thanks again.

gmw

ps
If you want the court secured, case hearing docket entries;

Go to: Ventura Superior Court.

Click on: public access-case inquiries

Click; Continue

Click; Traffic and criminal

Click; Docket entries

Click; By name and date of birth.

Type in;
Glen (first)
Wilson (last)
01 (month)
07 (day)
1952 (year)

Click on case number;2001044311

And the first 50 of 1,210 case hearing docket entries will be in view.

After which, just click go to get the next 50.

I'll show you how to read sign and spore of a rogue Calif. Grizzly.
chief said...
Hmm...

This, I think, is the point where I politely explain that I'm not going to go any further with this correspondence.

No more posts from me after this one.

From experience, I know how this dialog is likely to go: in perpetual circles. I have no interest in finding myself dislodged from my current worldview, and neither do you seriously want to consider that I'm right and you're wrong. This puts us in the philosophical equivalent of a mexican stand-off.

You've welcomed me to your world, but I'm going to decline that invitation. Please don't take offense, it's just that I've got lots of business in my world to attend to--however corrupt and blinkered my world might be, it's really all I've got.

Best of luck to you, though. I mean that.

Cheif
Glen Michael Wilson said...
Hey Chief,

No offense taken.

It was nice to have someone hack away at my narrative as astute as yourself and see that suppositions, and biases were the only arguments that you could marshal against my narrative, and case hearing records.

I di appreciate your posts. And I'm sorry to hear that ypu couldn't have been shaken loose from your blinkered world view, by basic reason, and simple logic. I could have been moved off of my position by such. Easily.

Good luck, good health, and thanks again.

Glen Michael Wilson

Justice only flows from what is true.



Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.

Sunday, October 28, 2007

To:Glenn A. "not so" Fine; DOJ Inspector General. Fuck you! You worthless piece of shit!

To: Glenn A. "not so" Fine (Inspector General-Dept. of Justice)
FUCK YOU! yOU WORTHLESS PIECE OF SHIT!

Below is a copy of the actual e-mail that I sent to the Department of Justice-Inspector General, by the DOJ's secure electronic filing avenue that is set up to deal with nothing but; "Civil liberties violations of a citizens constitutional rights by a DOJ employee." At a DOJ congressional oversight committee hearing in 2004 the Dept. of Justice aknowledged that over 70 percent of ALL complaints of this nature are filed with the DOJ-OIG by this avenue.

I can see why the DOJ-OIG likes it. They don't respond. EVER. If they don't respond. They don't have to refute allegations of criminal actions by a DOJ employee. This s especially helpful if the criminal actions are irrefutable.

Almost a year later. And Glenn Fine the DOJ-OIG still hasn't responded. Neither has any of his minions, and gophers. Fuck you! Glen "not so" Fine.
You are a worthless piece of shit.
**********************************
Sir,
In early 2004, I filed a complaint with your office, (Department of Justice-Office of the inspector General) It was a complaint of; "Civil liberties violations by a Department of Justice employee." (FBI special agent, Michael Templin. Ventura Calif. FBI branch office)

I filed this complaint by way of the DOJ- Office if the Inspector General's secure, "complaint's of civil liberties by a DOJ employee" filing e-mail site.

This is the complaint filing site that your Office had set up to address complaints of this specific nature.

This site can only be accessed by going to the U.S. Department of Justice's Home Website.

The Department of Justice's "Office of Professional Responsibility" has stated in their annual reports to the DOJ's Congressional Oversight Comittee that approx. 70 percent of all complaints of; "Civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" are filed with the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General via this electronic complaint filing avenue.

Right next to the "submit" button at the bottom of the electronic complaint form was a "box" with this message next to it; "Check here if you want aknowledgment of the reciept of your complaint by the DOJ-OIG."

I checked this box when I sent my initial complaint filing, and twice more over the two weeks, when I sent "complaint additions" to the DOJ-OIG.

I never recieved "aknowledgement of reciept of my complaint." For any of these complaint filings.

Nor has any represenitive from the office of the DOJ-OIG ever contacted me in regards to my complaint.

In the two years after my initial complaint filing of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" with your office, I contacted your Office another 16 times, by the same
DOJ-OIG's secure, complaint filing e-mail avenue. Seeking; "Status of my complaint of Civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee."

The Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General has never responded to any of the 16 "status of complaint" requests either.

These were requests for basic information that anyone would have a right to know, and would want to know.

Especially if they had felt that their constitutional rights to "Due process, and equal protection under the law." had not only been violated by a Department of Justice employee, but that they had been deliberately violated by a DOJ employee, "Under the Color of Law."

Here are the specific request's for information that I repeatedly contacted your Office, 16 times over a two years plus period to provide to me;

(1.) Status of my complaint.

(2.) Name of the DOJ-OIG agent in charge of investigating my complaint.

(3.) To what person, and to what address do I send the court records evidence, and
witness names, that would bolster my claims that FBI special agent Michael
Templin had more than enough verifiable information to act in my behalf.
When I initially came to him with evidence of public corruption, that was
committed by officers of the Ventura County Superior Court. (Federal
crimes that the FBI has a statutory obligation to investigate.)

(4.) My request in all of these contacts, for the help of the Inspector General's
Office to; "get the block that was in place, on my filing a
"formal, written complaint" of; "conspiracy to deny due
process, and equal protection under the law." against the;
"Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court."

That had been erected by FBI special agent Michael Templin. At both the
Ventura, and Los Angeles, Calif. FBI branches. (If there is no "formal
written complaint" there are no irrefutable allegations to
refute.)

In my last complaint addition to the DOJ-OIG, On or about Sept. 20th, 2004. I truthfully relayed how FBI special agent Michael Templin, had mis-represented himself to me. On July 2nd, 2004. By his claiming to be; "The supervisory agent in charge" of FBI agent Michal Templin." (himself)

Doing this, to secure from me, a complete copy of my "complaint of civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee." That I had filed with the DOJ-Office of the Inspector General.

To all of the above; Complaint filings;

To all of the above; Basic, requests for status of the DOJ-OIG's investigation;

To all of the above; Honest, sincere, truthful pleas for help from your office;

TOTAL SILENCE.

Why is this? If your investigation were to conclude that I was wrong in my belief that the complaint that I filed with your office against FBI agent Michael Templin was valid, then you should address my allegations point by point, and refute them point by point.

In writing. So that your office is on the record as to what conclusions the OIG's investigation of my complaint has arrived at.

It's called; A FINDING.

One that either supports my allegations. Or refutes them.

THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE - OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL IS THE PEOPLE'S LAST SHIELD AND WEAPON OF THIS NATION'S LAW.

THAT IS SWORN BY SACRED OATH, MANDATED BY LAW, AND OBLIGATED BY ANY STANDARD OF ETHICAL AND MORAL DECENCY THAT YOU CARE TO MEASURE IT WITH TO;

PROTECT THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY AGAINST THE CRIMINAL PREDATIONS OF INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE ABUSED THE GREAT POWERS THAT ARE GIVEN TO A FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT.

Your office has maintained total silence to all requests for a FINDING.

It is beginning to look as if the present Inspector General of the Department of Justice has subverted the mission of the DOJ-OIG from honestly, and openly investigating a citizen's allegations of High Federal Crimes, to a baser an less honorable task.

Which seems to be; "Using this complaint filing process to get a "Heads Up" on what evidence of Federal Crimes that were committed by a DOJ employee have been discovered by a private citizen.

To craft alibis, or minimize the impact of what evidence there might be. In advance of a person going public.

Because for a year or so, most people will think that you are honest ethical individuals. Diligently working "towards the truth."

You should be. The process of investigaing such serious allegations should be open and above reproach.

With out even the appearance of impropiety.

Too late for that isn't it?

In this request for status of the investigation of my complaint of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee, I request that the:

INSPECTOR GENERAL: GLENN A. FINE; of the; Department of Justice - Office of the Inspector General, respond to my request for "status of my complaint. And the above listed basic, reasonable requests for basic, reasonable information that I have a right to know.

This time, I also request from you sir, Glen A. Fine, and no one else, an explanation as to why your office has conducted itself in such an ethicaly suspect manner as concerns the disposition of my complaint.

If you haven't responded honestly to this basic request before "end of business" Tuesday, May 22, you can answer my questions before the DOJ's congressional oversight committee.
On the record. In public.

How ever you prefer.

Sincerely,
Glen Michael Wilson
e-mail:wordwaymike@yahoo.com




__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Saturday, October 27, 2007

Wrong man killed right after my release from Patton. At my place of employment.

Wrong man killed right after my release from Patton. At my place of employment.

I was released from Patton shortly after my 60 day evaluation. Which is about as quick as anyone gets a finding of incompetency turned around.
Judge Cloninger, and my faithless as Judas Iscariot himself, public pretender, Randy Tucker, I am sure figured that shortly after my arrival at Patton, I would;
"Start demanding that people listen." Or better yet, start threatening all kinds of adverse legal consequences. In either instance, they probably envisioned me; "Raising my voice, shouting in wild eyed outrage. Pounding my fist on the nurses station ledge...
And quickly and quietly being approached from behind by two or three psych techs. That would body slam me to the ground, where one of them would drop with all of his weight on to the small of my back with a knee, while another would keep my arms from flailing about, and the third would pull a "ready to go" injection of enough of something strong enough to drop a rogue elephant in its tracks.
Something that will reduce the patient to a drooling, piss soaked mostly immobilized, wheel-chair restrained puddle of humanity that can only mumble things like; "My mouth is dry." for the next two to three days.
And once a person has an "incident" in their patient records. That person has a HISTORY.
And once you have a history. Well...
They need to "hold you longer.
And evaluate where all of this anger is coming from.
They'll want to "try" several different mood, and let's not forget, mind altering combinations of drugs.
Just to get an idea as to which one achieves the most encouraging results. And after they get you on the daily heavy duty mind and body tranquilized combo drug conga line of despair, it isn't long before there is another incident. Then another. And if, or when, what ever is left of you is "allowed" to leave their facility/program/lower level hub of Hell, You have a HISTORY that leaves with you.
I know that this sounds way too melodramatic to be real. As in "actually going on." But I saw what I just related to you shortly after my arrival at Patton. And I witnessed the repeat of this structured little psych ballet between patients and staff numerous times in the 75 days that I was at Patton for; "Treatment, and evaluation.
All I can truthfully relate to you is this.
There is no treatment.
There is no evaluation.
You are what ever that commitment paper says you are. Nothing more, or less.
At my 60 day evaluation, which is the first time that everyone who was assigned to me and my particular mental health problem gets together and comes to some kind of agreement as to exactly how the states determined intention of skinning your psychological cat is going to be accomplished.
With great pains taken to conjure up the illusion of a process that endeavors to be humane and helpful.
But the illusion is necessary because no one who has chosen "Mental Health" as their profession is willing to put the truth into words as relates to what they do. Which is this;
Drugging as many mentally disabled (problem) people as possible, so completely, by the use of unbelievably debilitating drugs, that none of them would be able to effectively document, describe and convey to others the Stephen King wide eyed nightmare that our mental health system has become.
Mans inhumanity to man, gussied up to look like compassionate care and concern.
Institutionalized inhumanity to man.
But at my 60 day evaluation, they chose to "punt" instead of run with the ball, or pass me off to another wing. Another process. Another mental management mantra.
When I walked into the room. As soon as I sat down, I was asked; "What are you doing here?"
I had repeatedly, but in a non emotional, non insistent manner related my blues and hard luck tale of woe to each and every person in that room. Some more than once, or twice. So my response at that moment was this;
"You have no idea how much that I wish that I had a more believable truth to relate to you, as to why I was sent here." Unfortunately, this is the only truth I have."
Then the lead psychologist said; "We're sending you back. With our finding that you are competent to stand trial."
So I was transferred back to Ventura County Jail 15 days later. Where I am sure no one was expecting to see me for a long time.
And much like that old Irish prayer; "May you be in Heaven an hour before the Devil knows your dead." My return to Ventura County Jail, was followed by my immediate release from it.
Because I had O.R. (waiver of bail) on all charges, when I was remanded to custody, and sent to Patton. With my competency restored, my O.R. releases were as well.
I WAS GIVEN A COURT DATE TWO WEEKS IN THE FUTURE AND RELEASED.
Before any members of the judicial/prosecutorial/advocate cut-throat crew that had done this to me even knew that I was back from Hell.
**************************************************
NOW THIS OATH FORSAKEN, CUT-THROAT CREW HAS REAL PROBLEMS.
I'M BACK.
NO HISTORY.
COMPETENCY RESTORED.
QUICKER THAN THEY EVER THOUGHT WOULD BE POSSIBLE.
I layed low, completely out of sight, until I reported to court as ordered two weeks later. I had a couple of friends with me. It was in and out. I only got one thing accomplished that day. But it was the one thing I wanted most right then. I relieved myself of that morally bankrupt, worthless, souless, rat bastard poster child of every bad lawyer joke there ever was. Randy Tucker.
Now I was pro per again.
I had regained my right to speak in my own legal defense again. They were scared shitless.
Then, my plan was to drop off the map again for another three weeks. Until March 29th, 2004. The next date the court assigned for the start of my jury trial.
I was never more of a threat to this nest of vipers than I was at this period of time.
With my right to speak in my own legal defense restored. I could bring up, on the record, the allegations of misconduct I had brought against the prosecution.
I could bring up on the record, how judge Cloninger had illegally moved the disposition of my case forward before convening a misconduct hearing to see if my allegations had merit.
I could bring up on the record how judge Cloninger had illegally and coercively attached the condition of giving up my right to speak in my own self defense to his changing a "no bail" warrant into a waiver of bail O.R. release.
I could bring up on the record how the first words out of the mouth of the pre-positioned, pre-determined public defender, that I was forced to take as counsel if I wanted out of jail were to request a competency hearing.
I could bring up how judge Cloninger had ignored the evidence/letter of the Ventura County Sheriffs Dept. Legal Unit Head, E. Hobin, that stated that on May 28, 2003, a block was placed on my being let out of my cell to be in court for the third derailed start of my jury trial. That she could not get lifted.
I had been hiding out on Silver Strand Beach. At a friend house. Another friend, Debbie Castillo, rented a room there as well.
She was the cashier at the Channel Islands Liquor Store. In the shopping center where all of this craziness transpired.
Suddenly, not too long after my first court date after my release from Patton, when I relieved myself of counsel. Debbie is arm robbed twice in eight days. By two completely different robbers.
No cashier at this liquor store in twenty years has ever been arm robbed.
Then twice in eight days. To this day, Nietherone of them has been identified.
Then the owner of the liquor store. Pete Nebrek tells Debbie to; "Ask Mikey if he will come to the store with you on the nights that you work, and I will pay him to be your security."
The hairs on the back of my head started standing up when she told me that Pete had suggested this scenario. Because I had tied him into an earlier "trick bag" that these nut jobs had hoped that I would jump into.
But Debbie was my friend. And she was crying, and saying that she really needed to keep this job, but couldn't bring herself to work there any longer, unless there was some one with her at night.
So I said O.K.
I worked with her the next two nights. Then she was off for two days, and so was I.
The first night that both of us were off. A man was shot, execution style, (five rounds to the head and chest) as he took one step out side the door to the store.
There was a shooter. And there was a spotter. They each had a their own "get-away" car. They each had a driver.
The spotter went into the store, while the shooter paced back and forth, just outside the front door. Looking in to the store each time he walked past the door.
The spotter, it appears was to "designate" who was supposed to be shot, by some visible, and possibly audible cue, of recognition.
I believe that the spotter was supposed to give these cues/signs etc. when he saw me.
But I was off that night. And besides Pete, the owner, there was only one other person in the store.
Danial Alizar Hernandez.
And the spotter didn't give the cues/signals/signs for the shooter to lock onto.
But Danial Alizar Hernandez did.
When he turned away from the counter to leave the store, he recognized the spotter. They evidently had been/were on, good terms. Because when he recognized the spotter, he reached out, and took his hand, and said something like "Hey! What's up?"
I know this, because it is all on the video.
The shooter, walking back and forth just outside the door, looks in, and sees the acknowledgment/sign/cue/go-ahead.
Danial Alizar Henandez takes one step outside the front door, and takes five rounds to the head and chest.
When the shooting starts. Pete ducks down behind the counter. The spotter ducks down on his side. He hears the "bing, bing, bing" of Pete making a call on his cell phone. The spotter then stands up, and reaches over the counter, and down to where Pete is trying to make call. He grabs the phone out of Pete's hand and hunkers down again. He then either makes a call using Pete's phone, or pretends as if that is what he is doing.
Mean while, the shooter gets into the passenger side of his get away ride.
And they head out of the parking lot towards Hemlock St. with tires screaming. Reaching Hemlock, they hang a left and disappear into the night.
The driver for the spotter is a woman. Because she is heard by Pete, and even some people over at Champs Sports Bar screaming over and over, at the top of her lungs; "Get in the car! Get in the fucking car!"
Where upon, he runs outside, and does exactly that. He gets in the fucking car!
Now this get away driven vehicle is laying rubber, and fish tailing its way out the other exit from this parking lot. On to Victoria Ave. North bound.
Like the two previous armed robbers. The shooter and the spotter are never identified.
But all of this, part fact, part supposition extrapolation of events that I view as being meant for me, might or might not be true.
While it might "possibly" be a mixed signals fuck-up between the spotter, and the shooter. It could have as easily been some "bad blood, gang related, "payback is a bitch" type convergence of events.
Except for these two factual additions to the events that night; And the basic and simple logic and reason trails that this additional information would take you down.
I found some one who saw an Oxnard Police Dept. patrol car parked just across the street from the shooting. With a clear view of what transpired.
This person was sober, not a flake, and had worked for the Oxnard School District for twenty-three years. Here is what he relayed to me. Almost two months after the shooting.
There was one Oxnard P.D. patrol car parked on Hemlock St. Just before Anchor St. approx. 70 yards away from the shooting. With a clear view of the front door of the liquor store. And what went on there.
And when the shooter's get away vehicle sped out of the parking lot at a high rate of speed, tires squealing, he didn't budge. Even though they would have only been thirty, to forty yards directly in front of his patrol car when they did so.
He didn't respond to the shooting victim. He didn't give chase to the shooter's get away vehicle.
It was as if he was there in case some; "John Q. Public", concerned citizen saw what went down, and then hopped into his vehicle to give chase.
If that happened. This officer was perfectly positioned to be right on the back bumper of said hypothetical concerned citizen, with his lights flashing and his siren playing the pull over blues.
Only having to get involved with the aftermath of this shooting if said hypothetical concerned citizen became in actuality, a real one. Which didn't happen. So he continued to do nothing for a few more minutes. Then slowly drove away.
But IF the "hypothetical" person, became a real person; All he would have to do is hold this hypothetical/real guy at the curb for 30- to 60 seconds. Then speed off! Like he is on a mission!
When in fact, his mission had just been accomplished.
Here is the other factual addition;
About eight months after the shooting, I ran into the waitress that worked the kitchen at Champs Sports Bar. She had been taking out a garbage bag to the dumpster at the exact moment that Danial Hernandez was gunned down.
She wasn't my friend, and I had no idea that she was out side, in the parking lot at that moment. On the day that I learned this, she was talking to one of her friends, who told her that; "I only come over here to this liquor store, during the daytime. Ever since that guy was killed in front of it."
To this, Amber (the waitress at Champs) replied; "I don't blame you." I was outside in the parking lot at the time of the shooting. Taking out the garbage bag from the kitchen."
Then she tells her friend; "I still can't believe that there was a police car parked on Hemlock, AND ANOTHER ONE PARKED BETWEEN THE GAS PUMPS AT THE CHEVRON STATION WHEN THIS HAPPENED. AND NEITHER ONE OF THEM DID ANYTHING"
I mean, before I could even feel a little elated that I had found an independent verification of the patrol car that was parked on Hemlock St. She lets loose with the double whammy mind fuck factoid of another, completely different police car. Nestled between the gas pumps of the Chevron gas station.
Which is located right at the corner of walk and don't walk. Which in this instance means, Hemlock and Victoria.
I then asked her to tell me in which direction was the patrol car facing. Her response was; Towards her.
Which meant that when the spotters get away car sped out of the parking lot after the shooting, turning north on to Victoria Ave. This police car, like the one that was parked on Hemlock, was perfectly positioned to jump right out on to Victoria Ave and be right on the back bumper with lights and siren going of anyone that might have attempted to give chase to this get away vehicle.
Like the first patrol car, only having to "get involved" with the shootings aftermath IF some private citizen attempted to accomplish what it appears that the police were there to make sure wasn't accomplished.
I don't believe that Danial Alizar Hernandez had ever been a threat to those that controlled Law's power, and authority, not to mention those huge stacks of the highest denomination greenbacks in Ventura County.
But I was.
I had become the legal equivalent of a knife at the throat of not just some of the county's richest and most powerful individuals. I was a knife at the throat of these people's entire corporate rape, pillage, and plunder consortium.
A little over two weeks earlier, I had rid myself of my court appointed muzzle.
Daniel Alizar Hernandez was murdered. Execution style. On March 9th, 2004.
My fifth jury trial date was set to begin on March 29th, 2004.
Desperate people do desperate things.
I really need to know if Danial Alizar Hernandez is carrying my stone.
If he is. Then I must carry his until it marks the spot where the legal equivalent of a fire breathing dragon was finally slayed.
Or until it marks the spot where I fell in pursuit of that.
Post script to this part.
March 29th, 2004.
As soon as I made it past the x-ray machine, and into the "Hall of Just Us" judge Cloninger, who was the head cheesy weasel that had put me through this, pretended as if he "accidentally" bumped into me.
He looked up, at me with what I could tell was a forced grin. And as our eyes locked, he said; "Mister Wilson. You're back!"
My grin wasn't the real deal either. But I was a lot better at making it look like it was.
They had no idea where I had been for the last two weeks. Who I had talked with. What might result.
In actuality, I had been unable to enlist anyone's interest or support. That goes with the territory of a finding of incompetency. It doesn't matter that it was restored.
But I wanted this crew to think that I was holding a hand full of aces. So I grinned at Cloninger as if nothing gave me more pleasure than seeing that he was still here.
I kept my eyes on his, and my grin was ear to ear as I replied;
Yeah. I'm back. And I will be the only person in that court room today that has a certified paper that says I'm not crazy."
His grin fled his face only slightly faster than he scurried out of the main lobby. As I approached the double doors to the court room, I saw my prosecutorial adversary, senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, standing just outside of them. She wouldn't look up at me at all.
As I walked past her and her little covey of minions and gophers I said;
"Let's get this dog and pony show on the road. I'm the dog. Who's the pony?"
She never entered the court room that day. My sixth jury trial date was set for April 15th, 2004. For the first time, during this whole convoluted battle royale, with this crazier than a shit-house rat dark force cabal of seriously cheesy weasels, I could see, and smell the fear coming off of these creatures.
This was extremely gratifying to know that I wasn't the only one who was feeling waves of fear washing over me from time to time. I was coming out of my terror zone.
They were just stepping into theirs.
Welcome to Streetgangs.com

THE REGION

Man Slain Outside Oxnard Store

By Holly J. Wolcott
Times Staff Writer

March 11, 2004

A 28-year-old man was shot and killed in a gang-related attack outside an Oxnard liquor store Tuesday night, police said.

Daniel Alizar Hernandez of Oxnard was shot several times after leaving Channel Islands Liquor in the 3700 block of Hemlock Street, Oxnard Police Cmdr. Bryan MacDonald said. Hernandez, who was found sprawled on a sidewalk, died at the scene.

According to surveillance video from inside the liquor store and an employee's account, Hernandez walked out of the store and had an argument with a man who was waiting on the sidewalk.

(Bullshit. My addition to this story g.m.w.)

The man fired at Hernandez several times and then ran off, MacDonald said.

(bullshit; He was driven off. My addition to this story g.m.w.)

The store's surveillance tape did not capture the argument or the killer's face, but detectives believe there were several witnesses, including another customer inside the liquor store who left after the shooting.

Although the exact motive remains sketchy, evidence gathered at the scene, as well as several gang tattoos on Hernandez's body, have led detectives to label the case as gang-related.

The homicide is the city's fifth this year.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

MY THREE "ALLEGED" COURT APPOINTED COUNSELS.

MY THREE "ALLEGED" COURT APPOINTED COUNSELS

IN 2 YEARS, NINE MONTHS, FROM CHARGES BROUGHT,
TO JURY TRIAL;

I HAD 3 COURT APPOINTED COUNSEL:

DINO INUMERABLE


(1a.) In the eight months that Dino Inumerable
was my court appointed counsel; He refused to
interview my witnesses, prepare a defense, and most
revealing, he refused to even stand up and cite the
multiple case law reasons that second strike wasn't
applicable to my charge. Even though he knew that the
attachment to my charges wasn't legal. Preferring to
leave it in place as an inducement to; "take the
deal." Which was probation. This offer of probation,
in conjunction with a strike attachment in, and of
itself is illegal.
In November of 2002, I requested a change of counsel
from p.d. Inumerable's boss. My request was
refused.
(1b.)I then requested a Marsden Hearing, to replace
ineffective counsel.
At my Marsden hearing, I pointed out to the judge
these indications of p.d. Inumerable's ineffectiveness
as counsel;
That he;
had done no case preparation at all.
That he;
refused to interview my witnesses.
That he;
refused to let me take the stand at my suppression
hearing, so that I might refute the officer's
account on the record.
That he;
refused to gain possession of the Oxnard Police Dept's
radio traffic, for the 4 weeks prior to my arrest on
this charge, that would show a pattern of day and
night stops, warrant checks, and obvious harassment
leading up to this arrest.
(Which would counter the officer's assertion, that
this was a; "straight forward, by the books." stop,
and arrest.)
That he;
deliberately let the second strike attachment stand
uncontested, that the district atty's office had added
to the possession charge, when it became obvious to
them that I was not going to take the deal,
(probation) even though he knew that this attachment
wasn't legal for several reasons.
On top of all of this;
That he;
had done absolutely no trial preparation at all.
Making it apparant that;
p.d. Inumerable wasn't there to defend my interests,
but someone elses.
(1c.) After detailing all of these points, I told the
judge;
"I am not only entitled to court appointed counsel, by
the constitution, I am also entitled to an; adequate
defense. Now your honor, without wasting the court's
entire day, and mine as well, attempting to define
exactly how much of a defense is "adequate," certainly
we can agree that this describes some degree of
defense, as opposed to
no defense, which is what I received from p.d.
Inumerable.
(1d.) The bar to win at a Marsden hearing is high,
but I met, and exceeded it.
The judge asked p.d. Inumerable if he could work with
me, and was willing to do so. He (Inumerable) said,
yes he could. This query by the judge, and response
by p.d. Inumerable was the extent of the judges
questioning of p.d. Inumerable, as to why he had not
done any trial preparation in over 8 months.
(1e.) The judge then says this to me;
"I have known Mr. Inumerable for several years. He is
a very nice man. He is a very smart lawyer. You're
going to keep him."
(1f.) I told the judge that I didn't want to be my
own legal representative, and that I knew that I
needed the advice of counsel. But it would be foolish
for me to have someone at my side that was just there
to provide the "illusion" of my civil liberties,
"right to counsel" being met by the court. Knowing
that he was there, not to help me in my attempt to
have these false charges dropped, but to make sure
that what was true, and of import, as to the charge
was not allowed into the court's record. Nor would he
allow it to be heard by the jury, if he was at my side
as my "pseudo counsel".
(1g.) For these reasons, I removed p.d. Inumerable
as my counsel, and;
"reluctantly" becoming pro per on my case. (for the
first of two times.)

(2.) RANDY TUCKER
(2a.) This is the public defender that I was
coercively, and illegally forced into taking, on June,
3rd, 2003, if I wanted to be released from jail after
two weeks inside on another round of false charges.
Charges designed to raise the potential prison
sentence number of years that I could receive to 25 to
life. So high that they figured that I would have to;
"take the deal", (probation) rather than attempt
to go forward with my truthful account of the Oxnard
police patrolman's false arrest, by way of planted
drugs .
And of much more importance to these people,
To keep the reasons why.
On top of the original reason just stated they were
also now worried about the evidentiary record that
showed that the officers of this court were; "in the
pocket" of the owners of Tiger Real Estate Fund LP,
and their limited partners as well.
(2b.) Pub. def. Tucker, was not assigned to my case
by the usual manner of; "Next avai