What FBI agent Michael Templin was told about the conspiracy to deny me my civil liberties, under the "color of law" by officers of the V. C. Superior Court.
FBI agent Michael Templin fails to act.
1. August 5th, 2003. Contacted; (by phone) FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN; Ventura, Ca. FBI branch office. Approx. 1 hour conversation
(The 1st of four phone conversations that totaled up to approx. 4 hours of conversations between us.)
THE BASICS OF OUR 1st DISCUSSION:
Requested help in securing my civil liberties protections of;
Due Process, and; Equal Protection Under the Law.
Emphasizing the urgency of my request for help, and the reasons why. "time was of the essence"
In my first phone conversation with FBI agent Michael Templin, I told him that I was charged with possession of less than half of a gram of methamphetamine, and that I was offered probation, and had refused it. Insisting on my right to a jury trial.
I informed agent Templin that I had used meth periodically. But asserted that my refusal of probation was because in this instance, the meth had been brought, and planted on me.
I also informed him that a second strike allegation had been attached to this non-violent charged, mandating a six year prison sentence if convicted.
But probation was being offered in exchange for my swearing, and signing under penalty of perjury, that their fabricated version was the truth.
I told FBI agent Templin that I refused their offer of probation.
I went on to explain that the reason that I was calling at this point in my case, which was 19 months into the legal process, was because of a series of blatantly illegal mis-applications of law, that began to be evident in the court's case hearing records, from April., 2003 on.
I informed agent Templin that on April, 7th, 2003, 465 days after my arrest on this "simple" possession charge, my jury trial, that I had insisted upon, was set to begin. Except that it didn't.
The jury pool was chambered in a room behind the judge,(McGee, Kevin, court room 45) we are seconds from bringing out the potential jurors one at a time to be chosen, or rejected, to sit on the jury.
My prosecutorial advesary, (Senior Deputy District Attorney Catharine Taylor) jumps up, and requests a thirty day delay to the start of trial.
When the judge asks why, and knowing that she needs my consent, as I was pro per. ( reluctantly)
She proceeds to; "lie to the court, and defense" as to the reason that this delay was needed. Giving the one reason that she knew most likely would gain my agreement.
Her false, but given reason for requesting a 30 day delay was;
"I BELIEVE THAT THE SECOND STRIKE ATTACHMENT MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO Mr. WILSON'S CHARGE"
Then she says;
"To verify that this strike allegation isn't applicable I need 30 days, to send to North Carolina, for Mr. Wilson's involuntary manslaughter conviction records."
To send to North Carolina, for my 1970, YES, 1970, 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction records. (when I was eighteen)
Which the prosecution had used to invoke 2nd strike on a prop. 36 possession case, (when I insisted on a jury trial.)
But; they were still offering probation.
This was an illegal mis-application of the strike laws for the following reasons.
(1.) I was not part of the blooding.
My conviction was based on my not reporting the shooting, giving my friend, who had shot, and killed a man, money to leave town, and lying to the police for several hours as to what I knew.
The biggest mistake of my life, and just flat out wrong. Costing me my freedom, (for 6 years) My marriage. My service in the army as a medic, with the 82nd Airborne. My good name. And for decades, my belief that there was little of any worth to my person.
From my parole in 1977, till this bogus charge leveled against me on 12-27-2001 I had no further felonies. ( 1 DUI in 1985)
(2.) Even if they could use this charge, they STILL couldn't because;
IT WAS WAY BEYOND "TEN YEARS PAST COMPLETION OF SENTENCE.
(I WAS 19 YEARS PAST THAT POINT)
(3.) THEY WERE TREATING SECOND STRIKE, AS IF IT WAS THE THIRD.
THE SECOND STRIKE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OF A VIOLENT NATURE, AS WELL.
IT IS ONLY THE THIRD STRIKE. WHICH CAN BE ATTATCHED TO ANY FELONY.
(4.) IT IS ILLEGAL TO ATTACH A STRIKE ALLEGATION, AND OFFER PROBATION AT THE SAME TIME.
FROM DAY ONE OF THE INITIAL STRIKE ATTATCHMENT, ( IN MAY, 2002) UNTIL THE SECOND DAY OF JURY TRIAL, (TWO YEARS, AND 4 MONTHS LATER IN SEPT., 21st, 2004) PROBATION WAS BEING OFFERED IF I WOUILD "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY" THAT THEIR, "VERSION" WAS THE TRUTH. Which would then mean that what was true, wasn't. But it was, so I refused.
When a strike is attached, to a persons charges, you are making a legal statement that this person should be removed long term from society, because of his repeated use of violence. To protect the public.
When you attach a strike allegation to a person's charge of possession of less than a half gram of a controlled substance, using a 32 year old manslaughter conviction, as the basis.
A conviction in which the individual was in no way assaultive towards the victim, as your legal vehicle to do so, and you offer probation at the same time, here is the only thing that this is indicitive of;
IT IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE PROSECUTION TO FRIGHTEN A TRUTHFUL MAN, FROM GOING TO TRIAL, AND RENDERING HIS TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY BEFORE A JURY, IN OPEN COURT.
BY RAISING THE SENTENCE PENALTY SO HIGH, IF THAT PERSON LOSES AT TRIAL, THAT HE WILL "TAKE THE DEAL" INSTEAD.
When the senior deputy district attorney, that knows the law, and is aware that this is an illegal application of the stike laws, and yet invokes its application anyway; There is a hidden, secret illegal agenda at work.
When the court appointed counsel, who is aware as well that this is not legal, and is expected to immediately seek the strikes removal doesn't; Then this hidden, illegal adgenda has co-conspirators in a second branch of Justice.
When the judge; who most certainly is aware as well, that the prosecution is exceeding its lawful reach, and that the defense counsel is unwilling to defend his client, by letting this illegal application stand without challenge, refuses to step in and secure the individuals equal protection, and due process guarantees;
1. August 5th, 2003. Contacted; (by phone) FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN; Ventura, Ca. FBI branch office. Approx. 1 hour conversation
(The 1st of four phone conversations that totaled up to approx. 4 hours of conversations between us.)
THE BASICS OF OUR 1st DISCUSSION:
Requested help in securing my civil liberties protections of;
Due Process, and; Equal Protection Under the Law.
Emphasizing the urgency of my request for help, and the reasons why. "time was of the essence"
In my first phone conversation with FBI agent Michael Templin, I told him that I was charged with possession of less than half of a gram of methamphetamine, and that I was offered probation, and had refused it. Insisting on my right to a jury trial.
I informed agent Templin that I had used meth periodically. But asserted that my refusal of probation was because in this instance, the meth had been brought, and planted on me.
I also informed him that a second strike allegation had been attached to this non-violent charged, mandating a six year prison sentence if convicted.
But probation was being offered in exchange for my swearing, and signing under penalty of perjury, that their fabricated version was the truth.
I told FBI agent Templin that I refused their offer of probation.
I went on to explain that the reason that I was calling at this point in my case, which was 19 months into the legal process, was because of a series of blatantly illegal mis-applications of law, that began to be evident in the court's case hearing records, from April., 2003 on.
I informed agent Templin that on April, 7th, 2003, 465 days after my arrest on this "simple" possession charge, my jury trial, that I had insisted upon, was set to begin. Except that it didn't.
The jury pool was chambered in a room behind the judge,(McGee, Kevin, court room 45) we are seconds from bringing out the potential jurors one at a time to be chosen, or rejected, to sit on the jury.
My prosecutorial advesary, (Senior Deputy District Attorney Catharine Taylor) jumps up, and requests a thirty day delay to the start of trial.
When the judge asks why, and knowing that she needs my consent, as I was pro per. ( reluctantly)
She proceeds to; "lie to the court, and defense" as to the reason that this delay was needed. Giving the one reason that she knew most likely would gain my agreement.
Her false, but given reason for requesting a 30 day delay was;
"I BELIEVE THAT THE SECOND STRIKE ATTACHMENT MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO Mr. WILSON'S CHARGE"
Then she says;
"To verify that this strike allegation isn't applicable I need 30 days, to send to North Carolina, for Mr. Wilson's involuntary manslaughter conviction records."
To send to North Carolina, for my 1970, YES, 1970, 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction records. (when I was eighteen)
Which the prosecution had used to invoke 2nd strike on a prop. 36 possession case, (when I insisted on a jury trial.)
But; they were still offering probation.
This was an illegal mis-application of the strike laws for the following reasons.
(1.) I was not part of the blooding.
My conviction was based on my not reporting the shooting, giving my friend, who had shot, and killed a man, money to leave town, and lying to the police for several hours as to what I knew.
The biggest mistake of my life, and just flat out wrong. Costing me my freedom, (for 6 years) My marriage. My service in the army as a medic, with the 82nd Airborne. My good name. And for decades, my belief that there was little of any worth to my person.
From my parole in 1977, till this bogus charge leveled against me on 12-27-2001 I had no further felonies. ( 1 DUI in 1985)
(2.) Even if they could use this charge, they STILL couldn't because;
IT WAS WAY BEYOND "TEN YEARS PAST COMPLETION OF SENTENCE.
(I WAS 19 YEARS PAST THAT POINT)
(3.) THEY WERE TREATING SECOND STRIKE, AS IF IT WAS THE THIRD.
THE SECOND STRIKE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OF A VIOLENT NATURE, AS WELL.
IT IS ONLY THE THIRD STRIKE. WHICH CAN BE ATTATCHED TO ANY FELONY.
(4.) IT IS ILLEGAL TO ATTACH A STRIKE ALLEGATION, AND OFFER PROBATION AT THE SAME TIME.
FROM DAY ONE OF THE INITIAL STRIKE ATTATCHMENT, ( IN MAY, 2002) UNTIL THE SECOND DAY OF JURY TRIAL, (TWO YEARS, AND 4 MONTHS LATER IN SEPT., 21st, 2004) PROBATION WAS BEING OFFERED IF I WOUILD "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY" THAT THEIR, "VERSION" WAS THE TRUTH. Which would then mean that what was true, wasn't. But it was, so I refused.
When a strike is attached, to a persons charges, you are making a legal statement that this person should be removed long term from society, because of his repeated use of violence. To protect the public.
When you attach a strike allegation to a person's charge of possession of less than a half gram of a controlled substance, using a 32 year old manslaughter conviction, as the basis.
A conviction in which the individual was in no way assaultive towards the victim, as your legal vehicle to do so, and you offer probation at the same time, here is the only thing that this is indicitive of;
IT IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE PROSECUTION TO FRIGHTEN A TRUTHFUL MAN, FROM GOING TO TRIAL, AND RENDERING HIS TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY BEFORE A JURY, IN OPEN COURT.
BY RAISING THE SENTENCE PENALTY SO HIGH, IF THAT PERSON LOSES AT TRIAL, THAT HE WILL "TAKE THE DEAL" INSTEAD.
When the senior deputy district attorney, that knows the law, and is aware that this is an illegal application of the stike laws, and yet invokes its application anyway; There is a hidden, secret illegal agenda at work.
When the court appointed counsel, who is aware as well that this is not legal, and is expected to immediately seek the strikes removal doesn't; Then this hidden, illegal adgenda has co-conspirators in a second branch of Justice.
When the judge; who most certainly is aware as well, that the prosecution is exceeding its lawful reach, and that the defense counsel is unwilling to defend his client, by letting this illegal application stand without challenge, refuses to step in and secure the individuals equal protection, and due process guarantees;
Then this is indicitive of a third branch of Justice being a part of this conspiracy, and the denial of these rights is the determined aim of all involved.
When all this occurs in the legal process of an individual, that is facing many years in prison, if he loses at trial, but is offered probation if he desists, yet still wants a jury trial, because he insists that the police planted the drugs on him;
Then his claim of truthfulness, and integrity are evidenced, and the arresting officer's allegation's become suspect. Made so by the illegal, deceptive, and illegally coercive actions of people from all four branches of justice.
I DIDN'T TAKE THE DEAL. NOT THEN, WITH A 2nd STRIKE ATTATCHMENT. Which would mandate a mandatory minimum sentence of 6 years prison time
NOR LATER, WHEN THEY ADDED ANOTHER BOGUS CHARGE, AND ATTACHED A SECOND, 2nd STRIKE ALLEGATION. WHICH RAISED THE PENALTY BAR TO; 25 TO LIFE! IF I LOST ON BOTH COUNTS.
And don't you get the feeling that they would make sure that I lost at trial?
BUT EVEN WHEN I FACED 25 TO LIFE, THEY STILL OFFERED PROBATION.
EVEN THOUGH I FACED 25 TO LIFE, IN A RIGGED LEGAL PROCESS, WITH EVERY HAND , OF EVERY OFFICER OF THE COURT RAISED AGAINST THE LAW, AND WHAT WAS TRUE, I REFUSED TO BEND MY KNEE TO THE LIE..
NEVER IN MY LIFE HAD I DONE ANYTHING AS HARD, OR I BELIEVE, AS NECESSARY, AS GOING FORWARD TO WHAT I KNEW WAS GOING TO BE A RIGGED TRIAL.
REFUSING TO GIVE THESE PEOPLE THE LEGAL SHIELD AND COVER OF THE SHAM "CONFESSION" THAT THEY SO DESPERATELY WANTED.
When all this occurs in the legal process of an individual, that is facing many years in prison, if he loses at trial, but is offered probation if he desists, yet still wants a jury trial, because he insists that the police planted the drugs on him;
Then his claim of truthfulness, and integrity are evidenced, and the arresting officer's allegation's become suspect. Made so by the illegal, deceptive, and illegally coercive actions of people from all four branches of justice.
I DIDN'T TAKE THE DEAL. NOT THEN, WITH A 2nd STRIKE ATTATCHMENT. Which would mandate a mandatory minimum sentence of 6 years prison time
NOR LATER, WHEN THEY ADDED ANOTHER BOGUS CHARGE, AND ATTACHED A SECOND, 2nd STRIKE ALLEGATION. WHICH RAISED THE PENALTY BAR TO; 25 TO LIFE! IF I LOST ON BOTH COUNTS.
And don't you get the feeling that they would make sure that I lost at trial?
BUT EVEN WHEN I FACED 25 TO LIFE, THEY STILL OFFERED PROBATION.
EVEN THOUGH I FACED 25 TO LIFE, IN A RIGGED LEGAL PROCESS, WITH EVERY HAND , OF EVERY OFFICER OF THE COURT RAISED AGAINST THE LAW, AND WHAT WAS TRUE, I REFUSED TO BEND MY KNEE TO THE LIE..
NEVER IN MY LIFE HAD I DONE ANYTHING AS HARD, OR I BELIEVE, AS NECESSARY, AS GOING FORWARD TO WHAT I KNEW WAS GOING TO BE A RIGGED TRIAL.
REFUSING TO GIVE THESE PEOPLE THE LEGAL SHIELD AND COVER OF THE SHAM "CONFESSION" THAT THEY SO DESPERATELY WANTED.
NOTE: While at no time in the two years,and nine months that it took to reach my trial date did the prosecution ever put this offer of probation in writing, that the offer was real throughout this lengthy period is evidenced by this fact.
The two second strikes were removed by judge Coleman, on the afternoon of Sept., 21st, 2004. The end of my second day of jury trial.
(The day before the jury deliberated my fate.)
BECAUSE IF IT IS THERE ONE DAY LONGER, THEN JUDGE COLEMAN WOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED TO GIVE ME 25 TO LIFE FOR A SIMPLE POSSESSION CASE.
THIS WOULD HAVE DRAWN THE ATTENTION OF LOTS OF PEOPLE, TO A CASE THAT THIS COURT WANTS NO ONE "LOOKING" AT.
My case went back to "normal" sentence guidlines. Which was this; "If" convicted, (or I should have said, "when".) Because of my insisting on the extra expense of a jury trial;
sentence guidlines recommended a sentence of 6 months, to 18 months.
The judge, (Coleman) GIVES ME PROBATION!
Knowing that if I am sentenced to any prison time;
I will immediately appeal.
Knowing as well that my appeal will go to an appellate court outside of this county's sphere of influence. Where the "Rule of Law", and the civil liberties protections that were denied me in Ventura County Superior Court would be restored. (well, hopefully)
Also knowing that they would have no idea as to who I would be "contacting", and what would result from that.
AT MY TRIAL, I VERBALLY CASTIGATED EVERY OFFICER OF THE COURT, AND POLICE OFFICER THAT WAS PART, AND PARTY TO THIS ALMOST DAILY, MONTH AFTER MONTH, YEAR AFTER YEAR BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH SWORN SACRED TRUST. SAYING OUT LOUD, AND ON THE RECORD, WHAT WAS TRUE AS TO THEIR NATURE.
I CALLED THEM;
"PEOPLE THAT POSSESSED NO BOTTOM TO THEIR LOW."
"ALLEGED" SERVANTS OF THE LAW."
"MORALLY BANKRUPT INDIVIDUALS."
"AS CORRUPT, AND SOULESS, AS ANY OF THE PRISONS MOST DESPICABLE INMATES."
"SERVANTS OF THE LIE."
AND;
"THE LAWLESS IN LAW'S TEMPLE."
I asserted that they had;
"Turned and taken deadly aim at those laws that they had sworn a sacred oath to defend."
I WAS PUNISHED FOR THESE "OUTRAGOUS STATEMENTS" (that were true) WITH PROBATION.
Which brings us back to why this 30 day delay to the start of my jury trial was "really" sought, and gained on April, 7th, 2003. and a second 30 day delay was sought, and gained on May, 5th, 2003, by the prosecution lying to the court, and the defense, to gain two unwarranted, and illegal delays to the start of my jury trial. That is just the start of the Law's abort becoming blatantly obvious in the court's case hearing entries.
You are going to be amazed at the many ways they utilized to derail legal procedurs and replace them with; "The illusion of due process. The illusion of equal protection. Illusion is the stock and trade of this "smoke and mirror" emporium.
HERE IS WHAT THESE TWO 30 DAY DELAYS IN THE START OF TRIAL WERE REALLY ABOUT;
(1.) To allow the Oxnard Police, (primarily senior patrolman, Martin Polo) to place over 3,000 dollars in tickets on my RV (home) then impounding it. (rendering me homeless, and possession-less)
(2.) To arrest me TWICE during this period at my job.
( again, poss. controlled substance.) (Champs Sports Bar) to get me fired. ( leaving me without finances)
(3.) To ensure that I am in jail, on May, 28th, 2003, when my 3rd jury trial date came around. So that start of trial date would be derailed also.
(4.) TO ATTACH ANOTHER STRIKE ALLEGATION TO ANOTHER CHARGE. RAISING THE SENTENCE PENALTY TO 25 TO LIFE IF I WENT FORWARD, AND LOST AT TRIAL..
WHILE STILL OFFERING PROBATION IF I WOULD "SWEAR, AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY" THAT THEIR EVIL, SOULESS, LAWLESS AND MORALLY BANKRUPT LIES WERE THE TRUTH.
I DIDN'T. I WOULD RATHER DIE THAN DRINK FROM THE SAME CUP THAT THESE PEOPLE DO.
(4a.) It is telling, in the extreme, that it was Senior D.D.Atty. C. Taylor, a seasoned prosecutor, that handles major trials all by herself, who "volunteered" for morning arraignment, rookie D.D.A. work, to "short-stop" me, when I was arraigned on the 20th, of May, 2003. On the staged arrest/charge at my workplace. The same prosecutor who had stated that she was requesting a 30 day delay to obtain the 1970 conviction records that she needed to remove, the original strike allegation. This last stated by her 15 days earlier, when she requested another 30 day delay, telling the court, and defense that she was "still waiting" for my 32 year old records, that she needed to see before the original second strike allegation that she had attached could be removed.
Records that she had never sent for.
. She was now VIGOROUSLY OPPOSING O.R., (waiver of bail) BECAUSE; (AS SHE NOW STATED)
"Mr. Wilson is currently facing a mandatory minimum of 6 years if he loses at trial, and the District Atty.'s Office is going to seek another 2nd strike attachment to this charge, and if Mr. Wilson loses at trial on both counts, he will be subject to a mandatory sentence of 25 to life. For this reason,, we feel that bail should be denied." (she got her wish)
THIS IS THE LAWLESS NATURE OF VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PERSONEL;
HERE IS THE SOULESS COMMAND OF THE LAWLESS "ALLEGED" SERVANTS OF THE LAW, WHO AT THIS TIME , CONTROL THE VENTURA CO. SUPERIOR COURT; "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT OUR LIES ARE TRUE, OR WE WILL DESTROY YOU!
HOW MANY OTHERS HAVE THEY ROBBED OF THEIR RIGHTS?
HOW MANY OTHERS WOULDN'T AGREE TO THEIR TERMS, AND WERE DESTROYED?
I EXPLAIN TO FBI AGENT TEMPLIN THE MOTIVE;
MONEY, AND POWER
(AND POTENTIAL LIABILITY, AND LITIGATION WOES THAT COULD BRING DOWN A HALF A BILLION DOLLAR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION)
I explained to FBI agent Michael Templin, that for years I had not warranted, nor received the attention of any law enforcement agency anywhere in the nation. Until August of 2001.
I told him this changed within a month before this date by my coming to the conclusion , that the merchants at a shopping center in west-Oxnard, Ca.
(at the corners of Hemlock, and Victoria) were deliberately having their businesses destroyed by the owners of this shopping center
(TIGER REAL ESTATE FUND LP).
I had told a few of these merchants, and locals the things that I saw, heard, read, and deduced by putting all that I had learned over a two-plus year period together that had led me to the belief that the owners of this shopping center had liability for the cost of cleaning up a massive, longterm, toxic chemical spill of the processed chemicals used in the dry cleaning business that had leaked from an underground tank under the cleaners.
(located at this shopping center, THAT TIGER OWNED)
that was old, corroded, and not to be used,
(but none the less was) directly into the groundwater.
(Which in west-Oxnard is approx. 4 feet down)
Worse, for Tiger's owners, the loose, and sandy soil in west-Oxnard, and the proximity to the oceans water pressure pushing through it creates a;
"SLIGHT, BUT CONSTANT PUSH INLAND OF CHEMICAL BLOOMS IN THE GROUND WATER" .
So, daily for years, the processed dry cleaning chemicals are poured into the tank.
Nightly for years, these chemicals leak into the ground water.
Day and night for years, the slight but constant push of this toxic spill moves further away from its source. Under hundreds, if not more; 300 thousand to 500 thousand dollar homes, and condos.
Tiger Real Estate Fund LP facing a choice of an exponentially increasing cost of clean up. And worse;
Possibly hundreds of separate lawyers, bringing suit, placing liens on all of Tigers holdings where these liens would remain until this all was litigated out.
Maybe 10, 20, years, or more down the road.
I came to believe that faced with this scenario, Tiger's owners opted to keep secret the chemical leak. In an attempt to avoid liability.
Being a locally owned and privately held commercial real estate corp. with over a half of a billion dollars in such holdings in Ventura County, meant that they could "call in favors" and buy other favors from some with in county govt.
Those that did so abrogated a govt. servants prime directive. Which as I understand it is;
TO PROTECT THE PUBLICS HEALTH, AND SAFTEY.
Not this time. Not these boys.
I told agent Templin;
That within a month of my relaying the information to three merchants, and a few locals, as to what I had learned over a two and a half year period from the spring of 1999, till late july 2001, that dealt with the shopping center, and the strange behavior of its owners, all hell breaks loose.
I told agent Templin;
How a new property manager was brought in; Virginia, (last name ?) Who seemed to have only one specific, overiding concern.
That being my removal from this property, and area.
I told agent Templin;
How she went to the two owners of the Irish Sea, (Robbie,and Danny) trying to get them to fire me and bar me from the premises. Giving no reason, but leaving Robbie, who refused to fire me, with a bad impression, as she stated;
"I felt like she was threatening me."
I told agent Templin;
That the very next day she, (Virginia, the new property agent) saw me in the parking lot, and called the Oxnard Police. When an officer responded to her call, she told him that; "The owners of this property want that man, (me) of their property."
(Which in reality was; "To men with a half of a billion dollars in local power want this guy gone.")
I told agent Templin;
That the officer came over to me and in a gruff manner, said; "Get your shit, and get off this property."
I told agent Templin;
That I replied with what was the truth, and the Law. Which is this;
"It is the merchants, that have leased store front from the property owners, that determine who they want working for them, and patronizing their stores. Not the owners. Except in a situation where someone has hurt someone while on the property, damaged property, or created some sort of disturbance. I haven't done any of those things, nor do I plan to."
I told agent Templin;
That after this police officer checked the law, and found out that I was right, he informed Tiger's new property agent of this fact.
I told agent Templin;
That the very next morning, Tiger's new property agent again called Oxnard Police, and when the officer responded, she told him the same thing as she told the first officer the day before.; "The owners want that man off their property."
I told agent Templin;
That after I explained the law to this second officer, he went and checked what I had told him, over his radio, like the first one did, and that he also told her that I was correct, as to it being the merchants that decide that issue, barring some other factor of a criminal nature.
I told agent Templin;
That the very next morning, for the third time in three days,
Tiger's new property agent, even though she had had two different police officers explain the law to her in the past two days, called Oxnard Police yet again, and when the officer responded, she told him the exact same thing. The owners of this property want me removed from the property. Once again, I explained the Law to the police officer,and he then in turn explained it to her before leaving.
I told agent Templin;
That about a week after this, I see Tiger's property agent in the parking lot.
Her driver' window, to the driver's window of the west-Oxnard,day shift watch commander at that time.
I told agent Templin;
That for 3 days,for over an hour each morning, they would meet in the center of the parking lot, window to window, with an occassional look over at where I was.
I told agent Templin;
That a little over a week later, an Oxnard animal control truck, and officer was pre-positioned around a corner and out of sight from me and my two dogs, 3 to 4 hours a day, 4 to 5 mornings out of the week, in an effort to steal my pets.
I told agent Templin;
That for over four months, when ever Tiger's property agent, or the west- Oxnard day shift watch commander saw that I was using the bathroom at the gas station, or buying something inside a store; they would contact the animal control officer that was pre-position near by who would race to get to my dogs before I came outside. In an attempt to unlawfully steal my dogs. Under the guise of my dogs being "abandoned, owner unknown" Even though they knew that I would be inside the store for just a minute or two, and that my dogs were tied up, and very well behaved.
I told agent Templin;
That after six weeks of this, they finally managed to steal my dogs by this ruse, falsifying the report to read; "Dogs running loose", ( they were tied up on private property) "abandoned", (they knew that this wasn't true) "owner unknown." (how can you claim that the owner is unknown when you are following him day after day, week after week?)
I told agent Templin;
That they wanted 236 dollars to get my dogs back. Which I paid. My dogs were then completely caught up on licenses and shots.
I told agent Templin;
That in spite of this, they still assigned an animal control truck, and officer to me and my dogs as before.
I told agent Templin;
That I had learned from friends that knew people at the county animal control, where Oxnard Animal Control houses the dogs that they send to the pound, that Lisa Jenkins;
the head of Oxnard Animal Control, and the person that assigned a truck, and an officer to steal them, had been told by the west side, day shift watch commander, a fabrication about me to enlist her aid, in what she thought of as a "rescue" of these animals.
I told agent Templin;
The basics of what (Lisa Jenkins) was told by this Oxnard police officer. Which was;
There is this alcoholic , drug using, aggressive panhandler at this shopping center on the west side, that has two dogs that he doesn't care about, but he drags them around when he is panhandleing, because people feel sorry for the dogs, and give him more money to drink on. He will then tie the dogs up somewhere,with out food and water, and basically abandon them till he panhandles again.
I told agent Templin;
That I don't panhandle. Never have. Ask anyone who knows me.
I told agent Templin;
That if I drink 3 beers in a week, that's a big week for me. I grew up here, so you can ask anyone who has known me for any length of time, and they will tell you that it isn't true that I'm a heavy drinker..
I told agent Templin;
That I never leave my dogs abandoned, they never miss a meal, and that they both sleep under the covers with me at night. Anyone who knew me would tell him that. As well as this; I loved them dogs with all my heart, and they loved me with all of theirs.
I told agent Templin;
That this was done to hurt me by hurting my dogs.
I told agent Templin;
That 6 weeks after they stole my dogs the first time, they did it again. By falsifying reports again, and tailing me as well.
The report stated that my dogs were again; running "loose", but two different condo owners across the street saw the animal control officer untie them. Even though they were again on private property. Even though they had their tags on, they were again listed as abandoned, owner unknown.
I told agent Templin;
That these condo owners also told me that they couldn't believe that an Oxnard police officer on the scene, had sprayed mace in my dogs faces, while they were restrained on a short leash, tied to a tree on private property.
I told agent Templin;
That by his description, and the fact that only the west side day shift watch commander drives the 4 wheel drive black and white wagon I knew who it was.
(although to this day, I still don't have his name.
Every time I attempt to gain it, all hell breaks loose.)
I told agent Templin;
That when I called up about my dogs, I was told that I needed 444 dollars to get them out.
I told agent Templin;
That this was just six weeks after paying 236 dollars, and most of that went to their shots, and licenses.
I told agent Templin;
That I called up Lisa Jenkins, the head of Oxnard, Animal Control,
and told her that I knew the "story" that she was told about my being a drunk, panhandler, and animal abuser. I informed her that these were complete fabrications. I pointed out several of the provable falsifications in their reports of seizeing my dogs, and that I had two witnesses that saw the officer going onto private property to untie my dogs. Also that two people saw the Oxnard police officer who had "enlisted" her aid spray both of my dogs with mace, while they were still tied up on a short leash.
It was at this point that she blurted out; "My animal control officer wasn't there at the time!"
I said to her; "So you know about that already?"
I informed her that when a law enforcement officer, which she was, meets in secret, to discuss with others, exactly how they are going to deprive some one of their civil liberties protections, of; "Due Process, and Equal Protection Under the Law."
That this crime is so serious, that it carries a federal sentence of up to 10 years on each count.
This is where she hung up. Then she called this police officer.
I told agent Templin;
Of the steady progression of;
Stops; Threats; Warrant checks; Commands to; "Leave town."; and; "Shut up." that were rolled out against me day, and night. Day in, day out, for three weeks. Culminating with my false arrest, on bogus charges, by way of planted evidence, and falsified reports, on December, 27th, 2001.
I told agent Templin;
That I was truthfully asserting that my constitutional rights had been denied by;
"Specific, illegal actions"; that were committed by; "Specific, identifiable individuals;" Evidenced as such in the; "Sequential case hearing docket entries, and case hearing transcripts of case
#2001044311".
I told agent Templin;
That these individuals were;
"Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court".
And that they were to be found in;
All the branches of justice, in this court. (Judicial; Prosecutorial, and; Advocacy)
That the court's own case hearing records were unambiguous as to the fact that;
Civil liberties violations were occurring from April, 7th, 2003, onward.
And in subsequent phone conversations, and in two face to face meetings;
I kept informing agent Templin these civil liberties violations were ongoing.
My last meeting with agent Templin was about one week before my trial began.
AT WHICH TIME, I BROUGHT AGENT TEMPLIN UP TO CURRENT TIME, WITH THE WHOLE ARRAY OF ILLEGALLITIES, THAT HAD CONTINUED SINCE OUR LAST CONVERSATION APPROX. A YEAR PREVIOUS.
My civil liberties protections continued to be denied to me right on up till the trials end. Which was on September, 22nd, 2004.
And is still ongoing.
Last evidenced by the mis-applications of law, by judge Dobroth, which are detailed in the case hearing docket entries of that day. As well as in the courts transcripts of my hearing in judge Dobroth's court, on May, 24th, 2005. In court room 45, at 1:30 p.m. court.
I DIDN'T. I WOULD RATHER DIE THAN DRINK FROM THE SAME CUP THAT THESE PEOPLE DO.
(4a.) It is telling, in the extreme, that it was Senior D.D.Atty. C. Taylor, a seasoned prosecutor, that handles major trials all by herself, who "volunteered" for morning arraignment, rookie D.D.A. work, to "short-stop" me, when I was arraigned on the 20th, of May, 2003. On the staged arrest/charge at my workplace. The same prosecutor who had stated that she was requesting a 30 day delay to obtain the 1970 conviction records that she needed to remove, the original strike allegation. This last stated by her 15 days earlier, when she requested another 30 day delay, telling the court, and defense that she was "still waiting" for my 32 year old records, that she needed to see before the original second strike allegation that she had attached could be removed.
Records that she had never sent for.
. She was now VIGOROUSLY OPPOSING O.R., (waiver of bail) BECAUSE; (AS SHE NOW STATED)
"Mr. Wilson is currently facing a mandatory minimum of 6 years if he loses at trial, and the District Atty.'s Office is going to seek another 2nd strike attachment to this charge, and if Mr. Wilson loses at trial on both counts, he will be subject to a mandatory sentence of 25 to life. For this reason,, we feel that bail should be denied." (she got her wish)
THIS IS THE LAWLESS NATURE OF VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PERSONEL;
HERE IS THE SOULESS COMMAND OF THE LAWLESS "ALLEGED" SERVANTS OF THE LAW, WHO AT THIS TIME , CONTROL THE VENTURA CO. SUPERIOR COURT; "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT OUR LIES ARE TRUE, OR WE WILL DESTROY YOU!
HOW MANY OTHERS HAVE THEY ROBBED OF THEIR RIGHTS?
HOW MANY OTHERS WOULDN'T AGREE TO THEIR TERMS, AND WERE DESTROYED?
I EXPLAIN TO FBI AGENT TEMPLIN THE MOTIVE;
MONEY, AND POWER
(AND POTENTIAL LIABILITY, AND LITIGATION WOES THAT COULD BRING DOWN A HALF A BILLION DOLLAR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION)
I explained to FBI agent Michael Templin, that for years I had not warranted, nor received the attention of any law enforcement agency anywhere in the nation. Until August of 2001.
I told him this changed within a month before this date by my coming to the conclusion , that the merchants at a shopping center in west-Oxnard, Ca.
(at the corners of Hemlock, and Victoria) were deliberately having their businesses destroyed by the owners of this shopping center
(TIGER REAL ESTATE FUND LP).
I had told a few of these merchants, and locals the things that I saw, heard, read, and deduced by putting all that I had learned over a two-plus year period together that had led me to the belief that the owners of this shopping center had liability for the cost of cleaning up a massive, longterm, toxic chemical spill of the processed chemicals used in the dry cleaning business that had leaked from an underground tank under the cleaners.
(located at this shopping center, THAT TIGER OWNED)
that was old, corroded, and not to be used,
(but none the less was) directly into the groundwater.
(Which in west-Oxnard is approx. 4 feet down)
Worse, for Tiger's owners, the loose, and sandy soil in west-Oxnard, and the proximity to the oceans water pressure pushing through it creates a;
"SLIGHT, BUT CONSTANT PUSH INLAND OF CHEMICAL BLOOMS IN THE GROUND WATER" .
So, daily for years, the processed dry cleaning chemicals are poured into the tank.
Nightly for years, these chemicals leak into the ground water.
Day and night for years, the slight but constant push of this toxic spill moves further away from its source. Under hundreds, if not more; 300 thousand to 500 thousand dollar homes, and condos.
Tiger Real Estate Fund LP facing a choice of an exponentially increasing cost of clean up. And worse;
Possibly hundreds of separate lawyers, bringing suit, placing liens on all of Tigers holdings where these liens would remain until this all was litigated out.
Maybe 10, 20, years, or more down the road.
I came to believe that faced with this scenario, Tiger's owners opted to keep secret the chemical leak. In an attempt to avoid liability.
Being a locally owned and privately held commercial real estate corp. with over a half of a billion dollars in such holdings in Ventura County, meant that they could "call in favors" and buy other favors from some with in county govt.
Those that did so abrogated a govt. servants prime directive. Which as I understand it is;
TO PROTECT THE PUBLICS HEALTH, AND SAFTEY.
Not this time. Not these boys.
I told agent Templin;
That within a month of my relaying the information to three merchants, and a few locals, as to what I had learned over a two and a half year period from the spring of 1999, till late july 2001, that dealt with the shopping center, and the strange behavior of its owners, all hell breaks loose.
I told agent Templin;
How a new property manager was brought in; Virginia, (last name ?) Who seemed to have only one specific, overiding concern.
That being my removal from this property, and area.
I told agent Templin;
How she went to the two owners of the Irish Sea, (Robbie,and Danny) trying to get them to fire me and bar me from the premises. Giving no reason, but leaving Robbie, who refused to fire me, with a bad impression, as she stated;
"I felt like she was threatening me."
I told agent Templin;
That the very next day she, (Virginia, the new property agent) saw me in the parking lot, and called the Oxnard Police. When an officer responded to her call, she told him that; "The owners of this property want that man, (me) of their property."
(Which in reality was; "To men with a half of a billion dollars in local power want this guy gone.")
I told agent Templin;
That the officer came over to me and in a gruff manner, said; "Get your shit, and get off this property."
I told agent Templin;
That I replied with what was the truth, and the Law. Which is this;
"It is the merchants, that have leased store front from the property owners, that determine who they want working for them, and patronizing their stores. Not the owners. Except in a situation where someone has hurt someone while on the property, damaged property, or created some sort of disturbance. I haven't done any of those things, nor do I plan to."
I told agent Templin;
That after this police officer checked the law, and found out that I was right, he informed Tiger's new property agent of this fact.
I told agent Templin;
That the very next morning, Tiger's new property agent again called Oxnard Police, and when the officer responded, she told him the same thing as she told the first officer the day before.; "The owners want that man off their property."
I told agent Templin;
That after I explained the law to this second officer, he went and checked what I had told him, over his radio, like the first one did, and that he also told her that I was correct, as to it being the merchants that decide that issue, barring some other factor of a criminal nature.
I told agent Templin;
That the very next morning, for the third time in three days,
Tiger's new property agent, even though she had had two different police officers explain the law to her in the past two days, called Oxnard Police yet again, and when the officer responded, she told him the exact same thing. The owners of this property want me removed from the property. Once again, I explained the Law to the police officer,and he then in turn explained it to her before leaving.
I told agent Templin;
That about a week after this, I see Tiger's property agent in the parking lot.
Her driver' window, to the driver's window of the west-Oxnard,day shift watch commander at that time.
I told agent Templin;
That for 3 days,for over an hour each morning, they would meet in the center of the parking lot, window to window, with an occassional look over at where I was.
I told agent Templin;
That a little over a week later, an Oxnard animal control truck, and officer was pre-positioned around a corner and out of sight from me and my two dogs, 3 to 4 hours a day, 4 to 5 mornings out of the week, in an effort to steal my pets.
I told agent Templin;
That for over four months, when ever Tiger's property agent, or the west- Oxnard day shift watch commander saw that I was using the bathroom at the gas station, or buying something inside a store; they would contact the animal control officer that was pre-position near by who would race to get to my dogs before I came outside. In an attempt to unlawfully steal my dogs. Under the guise of my dogs being "abandoned, owner unknown" Even though they knew that I would be inside the store for just a minute or two, and that my dogs were tied up, and very well behaved.
I told agent Templin;
That after six weeks of this, they finally managed to steal my dogs by this ruse, falsifying the report to read; "Dogs running loose", ( they were tied up on private property) "abandoned", (they knew that this wasn't true) "owner unknown." (how can you claim that the owner is unknown when you are following him day after day, week after week?)
I told agent Templin;
That they wanted 236 dollars to get my dogs back. Which I paid. My dogs were then completely caught up on licenses and shots.
I told agent Templin;
That in spite of this, they still assigned an animal control truck, and officer to me and my dogs as before.
I told agent Templin;
That I had learned from friends that knew people at the county animal control, where Oxnard Animal Control houses the dogs that they send to the pound, that Lisa Jenkins;
the head of Oxnard Animal Control, and the person that assigned a truck, and an officer to steal them, had been told by the west side, day shift watch commander, a fabrication about me to enlist her aid, in what she thought of as a "rescue" of these animals.
I told agent Templin;
The basics of what (Lisa Jenkins) was told by this Oxnard police officer. Which was;
There is this alcoholic , drug using, aggressive panhandler at this shopping center on the west side, that has two dogs that he doesn't care about, but he drags them around when he is panhandleing, because people feel sorry for the dogs, and give him more money to drink on. He will then tie the dogs up somewhere,with out food and water, and basically abandon them till he panhandles again.
I told agent Templin;
That I don't panhandle. Never have. Ask anyone who knows me.
I told agent Templin;
That if I drink 3 beers in a week, that's a big week for me. I grew up here, so you can ask anyone who has known me for any length of time, and they will tell you that it isn't true that I'm a heavy drinker..
I told agent Templin;
That I never leave my dogs abandoned, they never miss a meal, and that they both sleep under the covers with me at night. Anyone who knew me would tell him that. As well as this; I loved them dogs with all my heart, and they loved me with all of theirs.
I told agent Templin;
That this was done to hurt me by hurting my dogs.
I told agent Templin;
That 6 weeks after they stole my dogs the first time, they did it again. By falsifying reports again, and tailing me as well.
The report stated that my dogs were again; running "loose", but two different condo owners across the street saw the animal control officer untie them. Even though they were again on private property. Even though they had their tags on, they were again listed as abandoned, owner unknown.
I told agent Templin;
That these condo owners also told me that they couldn't believe that an Oxnard police officer on the scene, had sprayed mace in my dogs faces, while they were restrained on a short leash, tied to a tree on private property.
I told agent Templin;
That by his description, and the fact that only the west side day shift watch commander drives the 4 wheel drive black and white wagon I knew who it was.
(although to this day, I still don't have his name.
Every time I attempt to gain it, all hell breaks loose.)
I told agent Templin;
That when I called up about my dogs, I was told that I needed 444 dollars to get them out.
I told agent Templin;
That this was just six weeks after paying 236 dollars, and most of that went to their shots, and licenses.
I told agent Templin;
That I called up Lisa Jenkins, the head of Oxnard, Animal Control,
and told her that I knew the "story" that she was told about my being a drunk, panhandler, and animal abuser. I informed her that these were complete fabrications. I pointed out several of the provable falsifications in their reports of seizeing my dogs, and that I had two witnesses that saw the officer going onto private property to untie my dogs. Also that two people saw the Oxnard police officer who had "enlisted" her aid spray both of my dogs with mace, while they were still tied up on a short leash.
It was at this point that she blurted out; "My animal control officer wasn't there at the time!"
I said to her; "So you know about that already?"
I informed her that when a law enforcement officer, which she was, meets in secret, to discuss with others, exactly how they are going to deprive some one of their civil liberties protections, of; "Due Process, and Equal Protection Under the Law."
That this crime is so serious, that it carries a federal sentence of up to 10 years on each count.
This is where she hung up. Then she called this police officer.
I told agent Templin;
Of the steady progression of;
Stops; Threats; Warrant checks; Commands to; "Leave town."; and; "Shut up." that were rolled out against me day, and night. Day in, day out, for three weeks. Culminating with my false arrest, on bogus charges, by way of planted evidence, and falsified reports, on December, 27th, 2001.
I told agent Templin;
That I was truthfully asserting that my constitutional rights had been denied by;
"Specific, illegal actions"; that were committed by; "Specific, identifiable individuals;" Evidenced as such in the; "Sequential case hearing docket entries, and case hearing transcripts of case
#2001044311".
I told agent Templin;
That these individuals were;
"Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court".
And that they were to be found in;
All the branches of justice, in this court. (Judicial; Prosecutorial, and; Advocacy)
That the court's own case hearing records were unambiguous as to the fact that;
Civil liberties violations were occurring from April, 7th, 2003, onward.
And in subsequent phone conversations, and in two face to face meetings;
I kept informing agent Templin these civil liberties violations were ongoing.
My last meeting with agent Templin was about one week before my trial began.
AT WHICH TIME, I BROUGHT AGENT TEMPLIN UP TO CURRENT TIME, WITH THE WHOLE ARRAY OF ILLEGALLITIES, THAT HAD CONTINUED SINCE OUR LAST CONVERSATION APPROX. A YEAR PREVIOUS.
My civil liberties protections continued to be denied to me right on up till the trials end. Which was on September, 22nd, 2004.
And is still ongoing.
Last evidenced by the mis-applications of law, by judge Dobroth, which are detailed in the case hearing docket entries of that day. As well as in the courts transcripts of my hearing in judge Dobroth's court, on May, 24th, 2005. In court room 45, at 1:30 p.m. court.
