OXNARD POLICE OFFICER - MARTIN POLO-(When you can't afford to do it right.)

The Oxnard Police Dept. is now vigorously fighting the deceased woman's family, in their attempt to look at the Oxnard P.D.'s investigation paperwork, and photos of the incident.

Also, refusing to let the family see the internal performance records of both Polo, and Brisslinger.

Both Polo, and Brisslinger perjured themselves at my trial.


They are fighting the family's request to see the O.P.D.'s investigation of the death. I believe possibly because the photo evidence of the accident/crime scene may not support the officers claims of being "unaware" that they had run over someone, until they recieved a call on their SUV's police radio.

If they realized immediately after running over the woman that they had done so, anyones initial first reaction would be to abruptly brake to a stop. On sand, if you do that, there will be four piles of sand, one in front of each tire, pushed up in front of the tire.

Then, if you decide to "play it off" as if you didn't know what you had done, you would give it enough gas to get rolling quick. That would displace more than the normal amount of sand than just; "rolling on through" would. Both actions would be easily visible in photos of the accident scene.

Both Polo, and Brisslinger perjured themselves at my trial.

My trial was a couple of years before the running over the woman on the beach incident.

Both have a long history of complaints by citizens, and internal police dept. actions. Officer Polo also was demoted from detective to sgt. for lying to the District Atty's office while under oath. That is the only action that has seen the light of day, as it became a part of the public record.

The rest of the "disciplinary actions", that demoted him from sgt. to corporal. And from corporal to "senior patrolman" are departmental, and therefore hidden from the public's sight, for the most part.

And yet, here they are. Patroling the beach.

The plum assignment for a patrol officer in Oxnard.

The nicest, most crime free section of town.

The plum ride. The Oxnard P.D.'s 4 wheel drive SUV.

Why?

I believe that it is because of the fact that when "the powers that be" in this city/county need someone to "cross that line" and not be worried about how that will affect their permanant record, who better to get than someone who's record can't be harmed anymore than it already is?

Also; Think about this; What does this tell the patrolmen that are a part of Oxnard P.D.?

It tells them this;

If you want to advance within this organization, these officers, and their actions, are what you need to emulate.
********************************************

OXNARD POLICE OFFICER; MARTIN POLO
(When you can't afford to do it right.)

Truthful statement of illegal actions committed against my person, and others, by Oxnard Police Officer, Martin Polo.

Formally:Detective Polo.
Formally: Sgt. Polo
Formally:Corporal Polo
Currently: Senior Patrolman Polo
There is so much to say about senior patrolman Martin Polo. Unfortunately, all of it is bad. He is legendary, within the city of Oxnard, among those that end up on his; "list of things to do." (to people)

The list, of people, as well as the things done to them, are both extensive. It is not just the illegal damage that he has wrought in my life, although he has most certainly done that. It is how far and wide he has managed to spread his misery around, that is truly amazing.

As well as how many times that he has been taken to task, by his superiors, the district attorneys office, Oxnard P.D.'s Internal affairs, and yet, there he is! In uniform. On duty.

Not just on duty, but plum duty. West-Oxnard, day shift watch commander duty. Shot caller of all daytime patrolmen in west Oxnard.
When I talk plum assignment, he has it. The nicest, most crime free section of the city.

Beaches. Fishermans Wharf. Million dollar homes.

The plum ride. A 4 wheel drive SUV. Soak up the sun. Take an hour, or an hour an a half coffee break, at Silverstrand beach each morning. Where he can watch the pretty girls, while he slowly wakes up. Take a long lunch.
He was a sgt. when he first got the assignment, in March, of 2002. When the previous west-side day shift watch commander had to make himself scarce, after I discovered his instigation, and continued involvement in the repeated thefts of my two dogs, Sassy, and Lowjack, at the request of Tiger's property agent.
(by the use of lies, falsified reports, pre-positioned animal control officers and truck)
Polo's been knocked down two pay grades since then. He's been the subject of more than one internal affairs investigations since then. But even reduced to senior patrolman, this is "his" beat.
He earned it. Not by years of dedicated professionalism, but by being the "go to" guy, when you need some one who's career can't be hurt by such things as "black marks"

Consequently, he doesn't mind a few more. As long as the "perks" of power,
like the plum assignment, SUV, and a deliberately unobserved, free reign atmosphere in which he can do what he does best. Which is...,
That depends on who you ask. Those that turn him loose, will tell you one story. Those that he is turned loose on will tell you the truth.

Brace yourself, there is a lot of it to be told. You would make things better? You could do much good here.

If you ever bring your investigation to Oxnard, there will be no shortage of people that will come forward to truthfully relate the most amazing array of civil liberties violations, large and small.

More than you could imagine could be hid along with officer Polo under just one rock.

Look no further, for all others are just pretenders to the throne of "under color of authority" civil liberties violators.

Senior patrolman Martin Polo is the national poster child in waiting for that title.

I will start by just listing his civil liberties violations, that he rolled out on me. Then the details.

POLO's CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS UNDER COLOR OF LAW.
April, 10th, 2003-May, 10, 2003

Placing over 3,000 dollars in tickets on my R.V. (home) in approx. one month, then impounding it. To render me homeless.

(Tickets like: "parked over 72 hours, when I had been there 2 or 3 hours. Or; "too close to a fire hydrant", when there wasn't even one on that block.)

April, 10th, 2003- April, 20th, 2003

During the same period, when I would move my RV across Hemlock St., which was the boundary line between Oxnard, and the city of Port Hueneme, to avoid being falsly ticketed daily.Officer Polo lied to the Port Hueneme police officers that worked that section of P.H., telling them that the woman staying with me, Sue Mullins, was a prostitute. Going on to say that I was "working" her out of my R.V.
She was in reality staying with me for sanctuary from her ex boyfriend, Adam Higley, who was stalking her. (who not long after this time period, aligned himself with officer Polo, signing the false statements that officer Polo needed to give him, "the illusion of probable cause."

In return for Polo's help in "bringing Sue around" to the fact that she
belonged to Adam)
You don't know me, but if you did, for any amount of time, you would know that this is something that I have never done, or could ever do.

Many people in this town have seen me daily for years. I suggest that you ask people that have seen my behavior towards people in general, and women in particular about my nature.

I don't fear the judgment of those that know me. Whether they might like me or not.

Only someone who had no idea at all as to my basic character would lay this at my door. It isn't only that I have never done this, and never would. It is that I never could do this. Period.(Higley had beaten, and choked her, threatened to kill her, and had falsly imprisoned her for three days, less than 7 months previously. When the police came to effect her release, Adam jumped out a window, ran down to a four way stop, and yanked a motorist out of his vehicle!

I have seen the temporary restraining order out of San Diego myself.
Officer Polo was doing this in the hopes that they would "drive" me back across Hemlock St., into Oxnard where he could renew his harrassment. (the Port Hueneme police knew Polo's history, and mine, so it only worked for a couple of days, with a couple of rookies)

April. 20th, 2003

Co-ordinating my first arrest at my place of employment, on a false charge, then going to five of my friends apartments in channel Island Village Apts., while I was being transport-ed to jail.

Pushing his way inside, and telling them; "If you let Mikey (me) eat, sleep, rest, shower, use the phone, you're next."
Having an Oxnard P.D. officer, (Brisslinger) on this night at my place of employment who was responding to a 911 call made by the woman that was staying with me, (Sue Mullins) for help, as her ex boy friend, (Adam Higley) was threatening her, disregard her request for protection.

She was holding the expired, temporary restraining order that detailed the false imprisonment, beatings, choking, threats to kill, and that when the police came to free her after three days, the ex boyfriend jumped out a window, ran down to a four way stop, and yanked a motorist out of his vehicle, to drive away.
Instead of offering protection, the officer, (Brisslinger) brushed her aside, and would not look at or take the the restraining order from her hand. Instead, after brushing her aside, he said to me; "You look high. Put your hands behind your back, you're under arrest." (I wasn't high, I was at work.)

When the woman started crying, the officer said; "I'll give you a five minute head start on Adam." I can't describe the terror in her eyes, or how fast she fled. Both were remarkable.

The next day, (April, 21st, 2003) Adam found out where Sue was hiding. It was at a friend's condo in Port Hueneme. Ron Edward's place. (About eight blocks away from the Oxnard city boundary line.)

He begins pounding on the door. Ron had never had any dealings with Adam, so he opens the door.

Adam knocks him to the ground and starts stomping Ron. Then quits this to go look
for Sue before she can get away. While doing this; Ron calls Port Hueneme 911, and reports a home invasion assault.

Adam hears this, and on the way out of the condo, stomps Ron a few times more.
Higley evidently calls Oxnard p.d, officer Polo, who had to be close by, or possibly waiting for Adam to get Sue.

Because officer Polo now wants Adam out of the county. So that he can't be questioned about the "false statements" that he provided Polo, that gave him (Polo) the "illusion of probable cause".

That "illusion of probable cause" Polo used to arrest me.

But Adam won't leave with out Sue. Polo hated me. Adam hated me. They both used each other to get what they wanted. But now it was time for Polo to cut Adam loose.

Just as two Port Hueneme police patrol cars screeched to a stop outside Ron's condo, Officer Polo's SUV screeches to a stop beside theirs.

Polo gets out of his SUV and confers with the two P.H. policemen for a minute. Then the Port Hueneme officers drive off.

Allowing Oxnard officer Polo handle their home invasion, assault, 911 call. Alone.

NOTE: This will be evidenced by the Port Hueneme police radio call logs for April 21st, 2003.
He walks up to the front door. Ron is still on the ground. Sue has come into the living room, and a third person, Brian, was at the Breakfast nook, on the kitchen side looking into the living room.

All three told me the same thing.

Polo was grinning, with a toothpick in his mouth. He looks at Sue and says; "Mikey (me) is gone. Forget about Mikey."

Still grinning, he looks down at Ron, still on the floor, hurt, and dazed, and says; "You don't want any more trouble with Adam?" "You don't want any trouble with me?"

"Let Adam have her."Then he turned and walked away.

May, 15th, 2003

In charge of second false arrest at my place of employment 3 weeks later. Telling bartender on duty; "Tell the owners that if they want to keep their liquor license, they should let Mikey go."

All six officers Polo, and five others, were on bikes. The first of only two times that I ever saw Polo on a bike.

The other time was when he pushed his way into my friends house looking for me to falsly arrest on a later date.

Here is why he was on a bike;

By being on my bike, and also being the arresting officer, Polo can call for a transporting officer.

At my preliminary, on June second, I can't wait to get Polo on the stand, I can't wait to get on the record every little coniving thing that he has done.

To me, to Sue Mullins, to Ron Edwards.

I can't wait toask him about His relationship with Adam Higley.

I can't wait for him to perjure his self, as I was sure that he would.

I can't wait...,

I'm still waiting. Two and a half years later.

You see, it was the transporting officer, and only the transporting officer that showed up at the preliminary hearing.

Who didn't know anything about the arrest, or the previous one on April, 20th, 2003, or Adam Higley, or Sue Mullins, or Ron Edwards, or his threat to the
bartender, about the owners losing thier liquor license or anything other than;

"I recieved a call from officer Polo, requesting a transport officer, as
he was on Bike patrol. "

Bike patrol my ass!

In both of these false arrests at my place of employment, he used the false statements of the violent ex boyfriend, of the woman who was living with me, as the "illusion of probable cause" to arrest me.

He also used to false statements of this individual to give him the "illusion of probable cause" when he pushed his way into five of my friends apts.

Pushing his way into another friends house looking for me, to falsely arrest me again with name tag removed.

At my trial, officer Polo perjured himself under oath by saying that he had never pushed his way in to that house. That he had never been in that house.

There were two people that lived at that house who he pushed out of the way, when he came in looking for me, who will testify to that under oath, when all of this comes out into the open, and they won't be subject to retaliation.

Truthful statement made by Glen Michael Wilson.











__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Martin Polo, Oxnard police officer investigated for "rape"

Here are the most recent evil-doings of Oxnard Police Officer, "Martin Polo." As you read on, you will learn that he was the lead Oxnard P.D. patrol officer that orchestrated, and comitted so many straight up federal felony due process, and equal protection violations against my person. With the serious as a heart attack enhancment on all of them of; "Under the color of law."

Also, I will send the news stories that begin last year (almost 18 months ago) that detail how he and his on-duty protege (Frank Brisslinger) had sucessfully evaded for a year and a half, having to give their testimony, "under oath" in the wrongful death of the sunbather (Cindy Connolly) that they had run over on the beach.

Brisslinger was the other officer at my trial that just slathered the lies on with a friggin butter knife for over twenty minutes. Both of these guys are practiced liars that have the practiced hurt look of a kicked puppy. When they lie on the stand, and you call them on it.

The last story that the Ventura County Star has run on the refusal of these two officers to give their account, on the record, under oath, as to the events leading up to, during and after this womans death, was May of this year.

The Oxnard P.D. refused to let an independent enforcemenbt agency investigate the "accident".

Then they ruled it to be a tragic accident.

And for over 15 months since that ruling, the Oxnard P.D. has steadfastly refused to let the family of the deceased woman see the investigation photos. (which seeing as how this all happened on beach sand, means that the "stops" and "starts" of the police SUV in relation to the deceased womans body would probably be easy to ascertain as to whether the non-sworn testimony of these two officers jibes with what the tire impressions reveal.

They, (Oxnard P.D.) have also denied to reveal the names, and statements of the eyewitnesses to their mother's death.

This is in spite of the fact that the family members of this woman have hired an attorney that is ranked as on of the 10 best in Calif. And ranked in the top hundred nationally of lawyers deemed to be; "Most effective." What ever the Hell that means..


Anyway. Back to Oxnard Police Officer Martin Polo.
Well, he has sunk to new lows. The article below was in the Ventura Star on August 21st.

This is the only story that I have seen in the Star-Online that didn't have a "comment box" at the end of the story for people to post their comments.

The paper is still working "hand in hand" with the "powers that be" to make sure that there is no "public forum" that airs all of these truths. With all the dozens and dozens of criminal actions by Polo, and Brisslinger over the years.

Local News

Home › News › Local News

Claim alleges Oxnard officer assaulted girl

By Charles Levin (Contact)
Tuesday, August 21, 2007

The family of a Ventura County teenager with emotional disabilities has filed a $1.5 million claim against the city of Oxnard, alleging she was sexually assaulted by a police officer.

The claim alleges Senior Officer Martin Polo, 43, raped the girl on Aug. 14, 2006, in a police substation after she sought his assistance. The Star does not name alleged victims of sexual assaults.

Oxnard Police Chief John Crombach said Monday that Polo has not been charged with a crime, but he was placed on administrative leave with pay after the claim was filed more than two weeks ago.

The department's sexual crimes unit has been investigating the case — without Polo's knowledge — for nearly a year, with assistance from the Ventura County District Attorney's Office, Crombach said.

According to the claim, the girl, who was 13 at the time, requested the officer's assistance. Polo then allegedly "placed her into his police vehicle" and drove to a police substation, where he "proceeded to rape her and force himself sexually on (her)" at the substation.
The incident caused the teenager "great bodily pain and shock to her nervous system, humiliation, fear, anxiety, torment, degradation and extreme emotional distress," the claim states, adding that she "may continue to incur medical and psychological treatment expenses in the future."

The teenager is now in a "lock down facility out of state due to her mental and emotional condition," according to the claim, which provides few other details.

"There's no other way than to take allegations of this nature with the utmost seriousness and leave no stone unturned," Crombach said. "Either you make the case or you exonerate the case. One or the other, this is a very serious allegation, and we have taken this very seriously."

A 20-year veteran

The department's internal affairs unit also opened an administrative investigation shortly after the claim was filed on Aug. 3, Crombach said. He added that Polo was apprised of both investigations at that time.

Under an administrative investigation, "we can compel an employee to talk to us," Crombach said. "If they don't answer our questions, they can be terminated."

Under a criminal investigation, a suspect must be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Crombach said.

Crombach said that Polo, a 20-year veteran of the department, was cooperating. The department expects to make a recommendation to the District Attorney's Office in three weeks on whether to file charges.

Crombach declined further comment, citing concerns of compromising the case.
Polo of Oxnard did not return a call Monday.

Until he was placed on administrative leave, Polo was coordinator for police Beat 21, which operates a community storefront substation in the 3000 block of West Hemlock Street.

Encino attorney Etan Lorant, who is representing the teenager, declined comment Monday.

The claim lists three people as "medical providers": Dr. Steven Ruths, a Ventura psychiatrist; George Cave, case manager at Aurora Vista del Mar, a psychiatric hospital in Ventura; and Diane Jackson with Youth Care, a Draper, Utah, residential treatment facility for adolescents.

Ruths, Cave and Jackson all declined comment Monday.

A claim is filed as a precursor to a lawsuit. Claims involving personal injury must be filed within six months of an alleged incident, Assistant City Attorney Alan Holmberg said Monday.

Lorant is seeking an exemption that allows for late claims if the incident involves a minor, someone who is mentally disabled or an excusable mistake.

The claim describes the girl as "mentally and emotionally disabled." Her father did not immediately file a claim because he mistakenly believed the city must finish its investigation first, according to the claim.

This is the second claim against the city for an incident involving Polo. On June 12, 2006, Polo was the passenger in a department sport utility vehicle involved in the death of a woman who was sunbathing on Mandalay Beach.

The driver, Senior Officer Frank Brisslinger, was exonerated after an investigation by the District Attorney's Office. Polo was not the subject of that investigation.

The family of the woman, Cindy Conolly, 49, of Sioux City, Iowa, has sued the city for $10 million.
*******************

Note: The only reason that the Ventura Star ran this story was because the attorney for this girls family called a press conference. There have been no further follow up stories. Nor will there be. Until this girls attorney calls another press conference in 6 months to a year.

Also: Ventura is the county on the coast just north of Los Angeles County.

The L.A. Times has a Ventura County edition. To churn out the 200,000 thousand plus copies of the L.A. Times for the citizens of Ventura County, the Times has a city block long, and wide, three story "presence" in the city of Ventura.

They have printed NOTHING about the sexual assault investigation of officer Polo.

They did the same obligatory blurb on the womans death that is a prequisite minimum that a news outlet can get away with doing when a high profile case has the lawyer from one side or the other call a press conference.

Both the Times, and the Ventura Star have had these case hearing docket entries "walked in" and "e-mailed" to their papers.

Both of these papers have had several different people, turn over highly incriminating evidence as concerns the actions of Polo, and Brisslinger. As relates to these two recent incidences, and my older one. As well as others.

There's just way too much money running through this county's illegal court house.
Plenty to pass around.

And it is either by way of large cash payments to newspaper editors, to bury certain specific stories that could lead to large municipal payouts for major fuck ups, if the truth had its day in court; Or by way of having some sort of comprimising/blackmail type information on those people at these papers that could kill a story, or investigation.

Which ever it is, the end result is;

Quid pro quo.
The Lawless Lie runs the show.
And around here, it's a three ring circus dog and pony Cluster-fuck.

Glen Wilson

Free the TRuth. Chain the Lie.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

Four hours of phone conversations with corrupt FBI agent Michael Templin

What FBI agent Michael Templin was told about the conspiracy to deny me my civil liberties, under the "color of law" by officers of the V. C. Superior Court.

FBI agent Michael Templin fails to act.

1. August 5th, 2003. Contacted; (by phone) FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN; Ventura, Ca. FBI branch office. Approx. 1 hour conversation

(The 1st of four phone conversations that totaled up to approx. 4 hours of conversations between us.)

THE BASICS OF OUR 1st DISCUSSION:

Requested help in securing my civil liberties protections of;

Due Process, and; Equal Protection Under the Law.

Emphasizing the urgency of my request for help, and the reasons why. "time was of the essence"

In my first phone conversation with FBI agent Michael Templin, I told him that I was charged with possession of less than half of a gram of methamphetamine, and that I was offered probation, and had refused it. Insisting on my right to a jury trial.

I informed agent Templin that I had used meth periodically. But asserted that my refusal of probation was because in this instance, the meth had been brought, and planted on me.

I also informed him that a second strike allegation had been attached to this non-violent charged, mandating a six year prison sentence if convicted.

But probation was being offered in exchange for my swearing, and signing under penalty of perjury, that their fabricated version was the truth.

I told FBI agent Templin that I refused their offer of probation.

I went on to explain that the reason that I was calling at this point in my case, which was 19 months into the legal process, was because of a series of blatantly illegal mis-applications of law, that began to be evident in the court's case hearing records, from April., 2003 on.

I informed agent Templin that on April, 7th, 2003, 465 days after my arrest on this "simple" possession charge, my jury trial, that I had insisted upon, was set to begin. Except that it didn't.

The jury pool was chambered in a room behind the judge,(McGee, Kevin, court room 45) we are seconds from bringing out the potential jurors one at a time to be chosen, or rejected, to sit on the jury.

My prosecutorial advesary, (Senior Deputy District Attorney Catharine Taylor) jumps up, and requests a thirty day delay to the start of trial.

When the judge asks why, and knowing that she needs my consent, as I was pro per. ( reluctantly)

She proceeds to; "lie to the court, and defense" as to the reason that this delay was needed. Giving the one reason that she knew most likely would gain my agreement.

Her false, but given reason for requesting a 30 day delay was;

"I BELIEVE THAT THE SECOND STRIKE ATTACHMENT MAY NOT BE APPLICABLE TO Mr. WILSON'S CHARGE"

Then she says;
"To verify that this strike allegation isn't applicable I need 30 days, to send to North Carolina, for Mr. Wilson's involuntary manslaughter conviction records."

To send to North Carolina, for my 1970, YES, 1970, 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction records. (when I was eighteen)

Which the prosecution had used to invoke 2nd strike on a prop. 36 possession case, (when I insisted on a jury trial.)

But; they were still offering probation.

This was an illegal mis-application of the strike laws for the following reasons.

(1.) I was not part of the blooding.

My conviction was based on my not reporting the shooting, giving my friend, who had shot, and killed a man, money to leave town, and lying to the police for several hours as to what I knew.

The biggest mistake of my life, and just flat out wrong. Costing me my freedom, (for 6 years) My marriage. My service in the army as a medic, with the 82nd Airborne. My good name. And for decades, my belief that there was little of any worth to my person.

From my parole in 1977, till this bogus charge leveled against me on 12-27-2001 I had no further felonies. ( 1 DUI in 1985)

(2.) Even if they could use this charge, they STILL couldn't because;

IT WAS WAY BEYOND "TEN YEARS PAST COMPLETION OF SENTENCE.

(I WAS 19 YEARS PAST THAT POINT)

(3.) THEY WERE TREATING SECOND STRIKE, AS IF IT WAS THE THIRD.

THE SECOND STRIKE IS SUPPOSED TO BE OF A VIOLENT NATURE, AS WELL.

IT IS ONLY THE THIRD STRIKE. WHICH CAN BE ATTATCHED TO ANY FELONY.

(4.) IT IS ILLEGAL TO ATTACH A STRIKE ALLEGATION, AND OFFER PROBATION AT THE SAME TIME.

FROM DAY ONE OF THE INITIAL STRIKE ATTATCHMENT, ( IN MAY, 2002) UNTIL THE SECOND DAY OF JURY TRIAL, (TWO YEARS, AND 4 MONTHS LATER IN SEPT., 21st, 2004) PROBATION WAS BEING OFFERED IF I WOUILD "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY" THAT THEIR, "VERSION" WAS THE TRUTH. Which would then mean that what was true, wasn't. But it was, so I refused.

When a strike is attached, to a persons charges, you are making a legal statement that this person should be removed long term from society, because of his repeated use of violence. To protect the public.

When you attach a strike allegation to a person's charge of possession of less than a half gram of a controlled substance, using a 32 year old manslaughter conviction, as the basis.

A conviction in which the individual was in no way assaultive towards the victim, as your legal vehicle to do so, and you offer probation at the same time, here is the only thing that this is indicitive of;

IT IS AN ATTEMPT BY THE PROSECUTION TO FRIGHTEN A TRUTHFUL MAN, FROM GOING TO TRIAL, AND RENDERING HIS TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY BEFORE A JURY, IN OPEN COURT.


BY RAISING THE SENTENCE PENALTY SO HIGH, IF THAT PERSON LOSES AT TRIAL, THAT HE WILL "TAKE THE DEAL" INSTEAD.

When the senior deputy district attorney, that knows the law, and is aware that this is an illegal application of the stike laws, and yet invokes its application anyway; There is a hidden, secret illegal agenda at work.

When the court appointed counsel, who is aware as well that this is not legal, and is expected to immediately seek the strikes removal doesn't; Then this hidden, illegal adgenda has co-conspirators in a second branch of Justice.

When the judge; who most certainly is aware as well, that the prosecution is exceeding its lawful reach, and that the defense counsel is unwilling to defend his client, by letting this illegal application stand without challenge, refuses to step in and secure the individuals equal protection, and due process guarantees;

Then this is indicitive of a third branch of Justice being a part of this conspiracy, and the denial of these rights is the determined aim of all involved.

When all this occurs in the legal process of an individual, that is facing many years in prison, if he loses at trial, but is offered probation if he desists, yet still wants a jury trial, because he insists that the police planted the drugs on him;

Then his claim of truthfulness, and integrity are evidenced, and the arresting officer's allegation's become suspect. Made so by the illegal, deceptive, and illegally coercive actions of people from all four branches of justice.

I DIDN'T TAKE THE DEAL. NOT THEN, WITH A 2nd STRIKE ATTATCHMENT. Which would mandate a mandatory minimum sentence of 6 years prison time

NOR LATER, WHEN THEY ADDED ANOTHER BOGUS CHARGE, AND ATTACHED A SECOND, 2nd STRIKE ALLEGATION. WHICH RAISED THE PENALTY BAR TO; 25 TO LIFE! IF I LOST ON BOTH COUNTS.

And don't you get the feeling that they would make sure that I lost at trial?

BUT EVEN WHEN I FACED 25 TO LIFE, THEY STILL OFFERED PROBATION.

EVEN THOUGH I FACED 25 TO LIFE, IN A RIGGED LEGAL PROCESS, WITH EVERY HAND , OF EVERY OFFICER OF THE COURT RAISED AGAINST THE LAW, AND WHAT WAS TRUE, I REFUSED TO BEND MY KNEE TO THE LIE..

NEVER IN MY LIFE HAD I DONE ANYTHING AS HARD, OR I BELIEVE, AS NECESSARY, AS GOING FORWARD TO WHAT I KNEW WAS GOING TO BE A RIGGED TRIAL.

REFUSING TO GIVE THESE PEOPLE THE LEGAL SHIELD AND COVER OF THE SHAM "CONFESSION" THAT THEY SO DESPERATELY WANTED.

NOTE: While at no time in the two years,and nine months that it took to reach my trial date did the prosecution ever put this offer of probation in writing, that the offer was real throughout this lengthy period is evidenced by this fact.

The two second strikes were removed by judge Coleman, on the afternoon of Sept., 21st, 2004. The end of my second day of jury trial.

(The day before the jury deliberated my fate.)

BECAUSE IF IT IS THERE ONE DAY LONGER, THEN JUDGE COLEMAN WOULD HAVE BEEN FORCED TO GIVE ME 25 TO LIFE FOR A SIMPLE POSSESSION CASE.

THIS WOULD HAVE DRAWN THE ATTENTION OF LOTS OF PEOPLE, TO A CASE THAT THIS COURT WANTS NO ONE "LOOKING" AT.

My case went back to "normal" sentence guidlines. Which was this; "If" convicted, (or I should have said, "when".) Because of my insisting on the extra expense of a jury trial;

sentence guidlines recommended a sentence of 6 months, to 18 months.

The judge, (Coleman) GIVES ME PROBATION!

Knowing that if I am sentenced to any prison time;

I will immediately appeal.

Knowing as well that my appeal will go to an appellate court outside of this county's sphere of influence. Where the "Rule of Law", and the civil liberties protections that were denied me in Ventura County Superior Court would be restored. (well, hopefully)

Also knowing that they would have no idea as to who I would be "contacting", and what would result from that.

AT MY TRIAL, I VERBALLY CASTIGATED EVERY OFFICER OF THE COURT, AND POLICE OFFICER THAT WAS PART, AND PARTY TO THIS ALMOST DAILY, MONTH AFTER MONTH, YEAR AFTER YEAR BETRAYAL OF THEIR OATH SWORN SACRED TRUST. SAYING OUT LOUD, AND ON THE RECORD, WHAT WAS TRUE AS TO THEIR NATURE.

I CALLED THEM;

"PEOPLE THAT POSSESSED NO BOTTOM TO THEIR LOW."

"ALLEGED" SERVANTS OF THE LAW."

"MORALLY BANKRUPT INDIVIDUALS."

"AS CORRUPT, AND SOULESS, AS ANY OF THE PRISONS MOST DESPICABLE INMATES."

"SERVANTS OF THE LIE."

AND;

"THE LAWLESS IN LAW'S TEMPLE."

I asserted that they had;

"Turned and taken deadly aim at those laws that they had sworn a sacred oath to defend."

I WAS PUNISHED FOR THESE "OUTRAGOUS STATEMENTS" (that were true) WITH PROBATION.

Which brings us back to why this 30 day delay to the start of my jury trial was "really" sought, and gained on April, 7th, 2003. and a second 30 day delay was sought, and gained on May, 5th, 2003, by the prosecution lying to the court, and the defense, to gain two unwarranted, and illegal delays to the start of my jury trial. That is just the start of the Law's abort becoming blatantly obvious in the court's case hearing entries.
You are going to be amazed at the many ways they utilized to derail legal procedurs and replace them with; "The illusion of due process. The illusion of equal protection. Illusion is the stock and trade of this "smoke and mirror" emporium.


HERE IS WHAT THESE TWO 30 DAY DELAYS IN THE START OF TRIAL WERE REALLY ABOUT;

(1.) To allow the Oxnard Police, (primarily senior patrolman, Martin Polo) to place over 3,000 dollars in tickets on my RV (home) then impounding it. (rendering me homeless, and possession-less)

(2.) To arrest me TWICE during this period at my job.

( again, poss. controlled substance.) (Champs Sports Bar) to get me fired. ( leaving me without finances)

(3.) To ensure that I am in jail, on May, 28th, 2003, when my 3rd jury trial date came around. So that start of trial date would be derailed also.

(4.) TO ATTACH ANOTHER STRIKE ALLEGATION TO ANOTHER CHARGE. RAISING THE SENTENCE PENALTY TO 25 TO LIFE IF I WENT FORWARD, AND LOST AT TRIAL..

WHILE STILL OFFERING PROBATION IF I WOULD "SWEAR, AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY" THAT THEIR EVIL, SOULESS, LAWLESS AND MORALLY BANKRUPT LIES WERE THE TRUTH.

I DIDN'T. I WOULD RATHER DIE THAN DRINK FROM THE SAME CUP THAT THESE PEOPLE DO.

(4a.) It is telling, in the extreme, that it was Senior D.D.Atty. C. Taylor, a seasoned prosecutor, that handles major trials all by herself, who "volunteered" for morning arraignment, rookie D.D.A. work, to "short-stop" me, when I was arraigned on the 20th, of May, 2003. On the staged arrest/charge at my workplace. The same prosecutor who had stated that she was requesting a 30 day delay to obtain the 1970 conviction records that she needed to remove, the original strike allegation. This last stated by her 15 days earlier, when she requested another 30 day delay, telling the court, and defense that she was "still waiting" for my 32 year old records, that she needed to see before the original second strike allegation that she had attached could be removed.

Records that she had never sent for.

. She was now VIGOROUSLY OPPOSING O.R., (waiver of bail) BECAUSE; (AS SHE NOW STATED)

"Mr. Wilson is currently facing a mandatory minimum of 6 years if he loses at trial, and the District Atty.'s Office is going to seek another 2nd strike attachment to this charge, and if Mr. Wilson loses at trial on both counts, he will be subject to a mandatory sentence of 25 to life. For this reason,, we feel that bail should be denied." (she got her wish)

THIS IS THE LAWLESS NATURE OF VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PERSONEL;

HERE IS THE SOULESS COMMAND OF THE LAWLESS "ALLEGED" SERVANTS OF THE LAW, WHO AT THIS TIME , CONTROL THE VENTURA CO. SUPERIOR COURT; "SWEAR AND SIGN, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT OUR LIES ARE TRUE, OR WE WILL DESTROY YOU!

HOW MANY OTHERS HAVE THEY ROBBED OF THEIR RIGHTS?

HOW MANY OTHERS WOULDN'T AGREE TO THEIR TERMS, AND WERE DESTROYED?

I EXPLAIN TO FBI AGENT TEMPLIN THE MOTIVE;

MONEY, AND POWER

(AND POTENTIAL LIABILITY, AND LITIGATION WOES THAT COULD BRING DOWN A HALF A BILLION DOLLAR COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE CORPORATION)

I explained to FBI agent Michael Templin, that for years I had not warranted, nor received the attention of any law enforcement agency anywhere in the nation. Until August of 2001.

I told him this changed within a month before this date by my coming to the conclusion , that the merchants at a shopping center in west-Oxnard, Ca.

(at the corners of Hemlock, and Victoria) were deliberately having their businesses destroyed by the owners of this shopping center

(TIGER REAL ESTATE FUND LP).

I had told a few of these merchants, and locals the things that I saw, heard, read, and deduced by putting all that I had learned over a two-plus year period together that had led me to the belief that the owners of this shopping center had liability for the cost of cleaning up a massive, longterm, toxic chemical spill of the processed chemicals used in the dry cleaning business that had leaked from an underground tank under the cleaners.

(located at this shopping center, THAT TIGER OWNED)

that was old, corroded, and not to be used,

(but none the less was) directly into the groundwater.

(Which in west-Oxnard is approx. 4 feet down)

Worse, for Tiger's owners, the loose, and sandy soil in west-Oxnard, and the proximity to the oceans water pressure pushing through it creates a;

"SLIGHT, BUT CONSTANT PUSH INLAND OF CHEMICAL BLOOMS IN THE GROUND WATER" .

So, daily for years, the processed dry cleaning chemicals are poured into the tank.

Nightly for years, these chemicals leak into the ground water.

Day and night for years, the slight but constant push of this toxic spill moves further away from its source. Under hundreds, if not more; 300 thousand to 500 thousand dollar homes, and condos.

Tiger Real Estate Fund LP facing a choice of an exponentially increasing cost of clean up. And worse;

Possibly hundreds of separate lawyers, bringing suit, placing liens on all of Tigers holdings where these liens would remain until this all was litigated out.

Maybe 10, 20, years, or more down the road.

I came to believe that faced with this scenario, Tiger's owners opted to keep secret the chemical leak. In an attempt to avoid liability.

Being a locally owned and privately held commercial real estate corp. with over a half of a billion dollars in such holdings in Ventura County, meant that they could "call in favors" and buy other favors from some with in county govt.

Those that did so abrogated a govt. servants prime directive. Which as I understand it is;

TO PROTECT THE PUBLICS HEALTH, AND SAFTEY.

Not this time. Not these boys.

I told agent Templin;

That within a month of my relaying the information to three merchants, and a few locals, as to what I had learned over a two and a half year period from the spring of 1999, till late july 2001, that dealt with the shopping center, and the strange behavior of its owners, all hell breaks loose.

I told agent Templin;

How a new property manager was brought in; Virginia, (last name ?) Who seemed to have only one specific, overiding concern.

That being my removal from this property, and area.

I told agent Templin;

How she went to the two owners of the Irish Sea, (Robbie,and Danny) trying to get them to fire me and bar me from the premises. Giving no reason, but leaving Robbie, who refused to fire me, with a bad impression, as she stated;

"I felt like she was threatening me."

I told agent Templin;

That the very next day she, (Virginia, the new property agent) saw me in the parking lot, and called the Oxnard Police. When an officer responded to her call, she told him that; "The owners of this property want that man, (me) of their property."

(Which in reality was; "To men with a half of a billion dollars in local power want this guy gone.")

I told agent Templin;

That the officer came over to me and in a gruff manner, said; "Get your shit, and get off this property."

I told agent Templin;

That I replied with what was the truth, and the Law. Which is this;

"It is the merchants, that have leased store front from the property owners, that determine who they want working for them, and patronizing their stores. Not the owners. Except in a situation where someone has hurt someone while on the property, damaged property, or created some sort of disturbance. I haven't done any of those things, nor do I plan to."

I told agent Templin;

That after this police officer checked the law, and found out that I was right, he informed Tiger's new property agent of this fact.

I told agent Templin;

That the very next morning, Tiger's new property agent again called Oxnard Police, and when the officer responded, she told him the same thing as she told the first officer the day before.; "The owners want that man off their property."

I told agent Templin;

That after I explained the law to this second officer, he went and checked what I had told him, over his radio, like the first one did, and that he also told her that I was correct, as to it being the merchants that decide that issue, barring some other factor of a criminal nature.

I told agent Templin;

That the very next morning, for the third time in three days,

Tiger's new property agent, even though she had had two different police officers explain the law to her in the past two days, called Oxnard Police yet again, and when the officer responded, she told him the exact same thing. The owners of this property want me removed from the property. Once again, I explained the Law to the police officer,and he then in turn explained it to her before leaving.

I told agent Templin;

That about a week after this, I see Tiger's property agent in the parking lot.

Her driver' window, to the driver's window of the west-Oxnard,day shift watch commander at that time.

I told agent Templin;

That for 3 days,for over an hour each morning, they would meet in the center of the parking lot, window to window, with an occassional look over at where I was.

I told agent Templin;

That a little over a week later, an Oxnard animal control truck, and officer was pre-positioned around a corner and out of sight from me and my two dogs, 3 to 4 hours a day, 4 to 5 mornings out of the week, in an effort to steal my pets.

I told agent Templin;

That for over four months, when ever Tiger's property agent, or the west- Oxnard day shift watch commander saw that I was using the bathroom at the gas station, or buying something inside a store; they would contact the animal control officer that was pre-position near by who would race to get to my dogs before I came outside. In an attempt to unlawfully steal my dogs. Under the guise of my dogs being "abandoned, owner unknown" Even though they knew that I would be inside the store for just a minute or two, and that my dogs were tied up, and very well behaved.

I told agent Templin;

That after six weeks of this, they finally managed to steal my dogs by this ruse, falsifying the report to read; "Dogs running loose", ( they were tied up on private property) "abandoned", (they knew that this wasn't true) "owner unknown." (how can you claim that the owner is unknown when you are following him day after day, week after week?)

I told agent Templin;

That they wanted 236 dollars to get my dogs back. Which I paid. My dogs were then completely caught up on licenses and shots.

I told agent Templin;

That in spite of this, they still assigned an animal control truck, and officer to me and my dogs as before.

I told agent Templin;

That I had learned from friends that knew people at the county animal control, where Oxnard Animal Control houses the dogs that they send to the pound, that Lisa Jenkins;

the head of Oxnard Animal Control, and the person that assigned a truck, and an officer to steal them, had been told by the west side, day shift watch commander, a fabrication about me to enlist her aid, in what she thought of as a "rescue" of these animals.

I told agent Templin;

The basics of what (Lisa Jenkins) was told by this Oxnard police officer. Which was;

There is this alcoholic , drug using, aggressive panhandler at this shopping center on the west side, that has two dogs that he doesn't care about, but he drags them around when he is panhandleing, because people feel sorry for the dogs, and give him more money to drink on. He will then tie the dogs up somewhere,with out food and water, and basically abandon them till he panhandles again.

I told agent Templin;

That I don't panhandle. Never have. Ask anyone who knows me.

I told agent Templin;

That if I drink 3 beers in a week, that's a big week for me. I grew up here, so you can ask anyone who has known me for any length of time, and they will tell you that it isn't true that I'm a heavy drinker..

I told agent Templin;

That I never leave my dogs abandoned, they never miss a meal, and that they both sleep under the covers with me at night. Anyone who knew me would tell him that. As well as this; I loved them dogs with all my heart, and they loved me with all of theirs.

I told agent Templin;

That this was done to hurt me by hurting my dogs.

I told agent Templin;

That 6 weeks after they stole my dogs the first time, they did it again. By falsifying reports again, and tailing me as well.

The report stated that my dogs were again; running "loose", but two different condo owners across the street saw the animal control officer untie them. Even though they were again on private property. Even though they had their tags on, they were again listed as abandoned, owner unknown.

I told agent Templin;

That these condo owners also told me that they couldn't believe that an Oxnard police officer on the scene, had sprayed mace in my dogs faces, while they were restrained on a short leash, tied to a tree on private property.

I told agent Templin;

That by his description, and the fact that only the west side day shift watch commander drives the 4 wheel drive black and white wagon I knew who it was.

(although to this day, I still don't have his name.

Every time I attempt to gain it, all hell breaks loose.)

I told agent Templin;

That when I called up about my dogs, I was told that I needed 444 dollars to get them out.

I told agent Templin;

That this was just six weeks after paying 236 dollars, and most of that went to their shots, and licenses.

I told agent Templin;

That I called up Lisa Jenkins, the head of Oxnard, Animal Control,

and told her that I knew the "story" that she was told about my being a drunk, panhandler, and animal abuser. I informed her that these were complete fabrications. I pointed out several of the provable falsifications in their reports of seizeing my dogs, and that I had two witnesses that saw the officer going onto private property to untie my dogs. Also that two people saw the Oxnard police officer who had "enlisted" her aid spray both of my dogs with mace, while they were still tied up on a short leash.

It was at this point that she blurted out; "My animal control officer wasn't there at the time!"

I said to her; "So you know about that already?"

I informed her that when a law enforcement officer, which she was, meets in secret, to discuss with others, exactly how they are going to deprive some one of their civil liberties protections, of; "Due Process, and Equal Protection Under the Law."

That this crime is so serious, that it carries a federal sentence of up to 10 years on each count.

This is where she hung up. Then she called this police officer.

I told agent Templin;

Of the steady progression of;

Stops; Threats; Warrant checks; Commands to; "Leave town."; and; "Shut up." that were rolled out against me day, and night. Day in, day out, for three weeks. Culminating with my false arrest, on bogus charges, by way of planted evidence, and falsified reports, on December, 27th, 2001.

I told agent Templin;

That I was truthfully asserting that my constitutional rights had been denied by;

"Specific, illegal actions"; that were committed by; "Specific, identifiable individuals;" Evidenced as such in the; "Sequential case hearing docket entries, and case hearing transcripts of case

#2001044311".

I told agent Templin;

That these individuals were;

"Officers of the Ventura County Superior Court".

And that they were to be found in;

All the branches of justice, in this court. (Judicial; Prosecutorial, and; Advocacy)

That the court's own case hearing records were unambiguous as to the fact that;

Civil liberties violations were occurring from April, 7th, 2003, onward.

And in subsequent phone conversations, and in two face to face meetings;

I kept informing agent Templin these civil liberties violations were ongoing.

My last meeting with agent Templin was about one week before my trial began.

AT WHICH TIME, I BROUGHT AGENT TEMPLIN UP TO CURRENT TIME, WITH THE WHOLE ARRAY OF ILLEGALLITIES, THAT HAD CONTINUED SINCE OUR LAST CONVERSATION APPROX. A YEAR PREVIOUS.

My civil liberties protections continued to be denied to me right on up till the trials end. Which was on September, 22nd, 2004.

And is still ongoing.

Last evidenced by the mis-applications of law, by judge Dobroth, which are detailed in the case hearing docket entries of that day. As well as in the courts transcripts of my hearing in judge Dobroth's court, on May, 24th, 2005. In court room 45, at 1:30 p.m. court.

---

---

Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.

I finally meet corrupt FBI agent Michael Templin. (but don't know it.) and; "We meet again."

I FINALLY MEET FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN.

But don't know it.

On July, 2nd, 2004, I went to the FBI branch office in Ventura, Ca., to see the "agent in charge".

Having had no response from the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General, as to my complaint of; "civil liberties violations, by a DOJ employee" (FBI agent, Michael Templin) in over 2 months; and with my trial looming, (at which 2 simple possession charges were ramped up to a potential 25 to life sentence, by two illegal second strike attachments to these charges.

With the vehicle for these attachments being my 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction in 1970.)

I wanted to see if I could "shake loose" some kind of assistance from the FBI locally, by making the "agent in charge" aware of just how many officers of the Ventura County Superior Court were involved in this; "Conspiracy to deny Due Process, and Equal Protection Under the Law."

That were committed; "Under the Color of Law."

This was 11 months after my first hour long conversation by phone with FBI agent Michael Templin, on August, 5th, 2003. In which I layed out all the events leading up to my calling him about the impending finding of incompetency that was due on August, 8th, 2003.

I had already been sent to Patton, (on November 21st, 2003) and evaluated as competent at my 60 day full evaluation and released. (early Feb., 2004)

But I could have potentially been incarcerated there for six years.

I believed then, and I still believe NOW that agent Templin knew that this was an illegal, unwarranted finding, yet allowed the officers of the Ventura Superior Court who had done this to me to follow through with this illegal action. Initially.

I believed this was because agent Templin was conflicted. Caught between his; "shared enforcement views," with those in the state court, and his duty to "protect and defend" the constitutional laws of this land, against any encroachment by public officials.

I have come to believe that there are other reasons, that to this day I still don't understand, as to why agent Templin refused to act upon the mountain of court record verifiable evidence that was unam- biguous in nature, and clearly evidenced that many things were greatly amiss in the officers of this court's handleing and disposition of my case.

From my release in Febuary, 2004, until I walked into the FBI Ventura branch on July, 2nd, 2004, the officers of this court were still setting dates for the start of my jury trial, and then derailing them.

They had derailed seven trial dates by this time.

March, 29th, 2004, was my fifth; "start of trial" date, but it was derailed by the prosecution's failure to show.

This is remarkable because senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, was standing outside the court room five minutes before 9:00 a.m. morning court, when I entered the court room, yet never entered it herself.

Five mintes earlier, judge Cloninger "bumped" into me, less than three steps beyond the x-ray machine. Smiling, and then saying; "I see we're back."

I responded with a smile as well, saying; "Yes, I'm back. And i'll be the only one in that court room with a certificate that says that i'm not crazy."

The next date set for trial was April, 15th, 2004.

April, 15th, 2004 was my sixth "start of trial" date, but was set back by the prosecution's procedural trick of sending in a new deputy district attorney, (Eric Bond) on this date, with the plea for "at least six weeks" to the judge, so that he could; "come up to speed" on this case. Stating that he had just been assigned to it; "this very day."

He was granted this delay, with trial now being set for June, 2nd, 2004. This being my seventh; "start of trial" date that the court had set.

Just nine more derailed; "start of trial" dates to go.

It was also on this day, (4-15-04) that I gave up being "pro per" on my case,

(This time voluntarily) and took a "conflict defense attorney" (John MacNamara)

I had heard from several people that conflict defense attorneys were; "a breed apart" from the "in house, we're all on the same team" mindset of the public defenders office, as relates to their relationship with the deputy district attorneys for the county.

I didn't know if this was true or not,

but I desperately needed counsel, and I knew it. The last thing that I wanted was to be running my defense, against this crew of cut throats.

Unfortunately, court appointed counsel John MacNamara, was no different than the first two court appointed counsels from the public defenders office.

He wasn't about to interview my witnesses, prepare a defense, attempt to have the strike allegations removed, or bring forward my allegations of mis-conduct against senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor. He flat out told me the first time that I broached this with him; "You can just forget about that. It ain't gonna happen."

"Take the deal." was his singular mantra, in all of his conversations to me.

Although he seemed more persistent, and insistent as we came closer to a trial date. This was because I wasn't allowing any more waivers of "speedy trial".

This aggravated court appointed counsel MacNamara to the point that he told me on, June 2nd, 2004;

"You know, they can just kill you."

So as you can imagine, I was feeling that the DOJ-OIG wasn't moving fast enough to resolve this matter.

I didn't know that they were not moving at all.

When I filled out the "reason for needing to see an agent" form at the receptionist's window, I put down;

"I want to see the supervising agent in charge of FBI agent Michael Templin, and give him a copy of all the information that I have sent to the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General, that is in my complaint of civil liberties violations, by agent Templin, against my person."

The receptionist took this form in the back, and in a few minutes, a man came out, and said that he was the agent in charge this day.

I briefly told him about what information I had given agent Templin, months previously, and agent Templin's assertion that there was nothing that his agency, (FBI) could do as relates to this matter.

I then told him that everything that I told agent Templin in much greater detail was in the copies of my complaint to the DOJ-OIG, that I wanted him to review, as I was still at the mercy of the lawless officers of this court, and that since their attempt to have me "committed for six years", hadn't worked.

I believed that I was in grave danger of either an "accident" that wasn't, or of "false charges" of the most serious in nature, and socially stigmatizing in type, to destroy any credibility I might have before trial started.

This agent told me that he would;

"pass this material on to the Los Angeles branch", so that there would be no appearance of this being reviewed by people that worked with agent Templin, and who might have a bias in his favor. So that there would be no questions that could arise as to whether or not this information recieved a proper review."

I thanked him, and left from there, once again with my hopes lifting, that finally, my information might land on the desk of some one who saw the destructive impact that these lawless officers of this court were having on the Rule of Law.

And the damage to this communities respect for the Law, and its true servants, that this resulted in.

Also, because I was seriously tired of being fanged repeatedly by these vipers.

I didn't find out until early September, 2004, that this wasn't FBI agent Michael Templins, "agent in charge", that I had just turned over everything, to that date, as pertained to my DOJ-OIG complaint against agent Templin.

But in fact, this was FBI agent Michael Templin himself.

WE MEET AGAIN.

I discovered this when I was called by FBI agent Templin in early September, 2004, at a friends number that I had left in my complaint information to the DOJ-OIG as a number that I could be contacted at.

The number was to Rose Macias's phone, who was at my "sham" remand to Patton, competency hearing, on October, 27th, 2003.

All the message said was that agent Templin, would like to see me.

I went the next day to the Ventura branch office of the FBI, and filled out the form, stating that FBI agent Templin had contacted me, and wanted to see me.

She took this into the back section of their offices, and a few minutes later, the agent that I had spoken with about 2 months previous came out. He then, for the first time, identified himself to me as; "agent Templin".

Agent Templin was carrying a folder that appeared to be about six inches thick, that I assume, had my name on it, because when he opened it, he made no effort to hide the approx. 10 digital photos that I had added to the complaint information, that I had brought to this FBI branch, to be given to the agent in charge of FBI agent Michael Templin.

Photos which showed;

1. The deliberate blighting of the shopping center where I alleged that a massive toxic chemical leak into the groundwater had occured.;

2. The test monitoring well directly behind the drycleaners;

3. The off color patches of newer concrete, that they poured over their access holes to the mis- stated work that this crew performed under the cleaners;

4. The large storm drain behind the repair site that someone patched over with
concrete, and stained with oil and tar, to make it look as if no storm grate was
there. (this was done at some point, while I was at Patton.

I believe in response to my queries as to why the workers at the repair site hadn't used the storm drain, if the seepage in their dig was just from the ground water. A kind of; "What storm
drain?" response, I guess they figured was better than none.)

5. Finally, a picture of one of the black 55 gallon metal drums with the name of the high tech, highly regarded, groundwater, and soil remediation company on a
contents sticker, that wasn't numbered, or designated as being part of a state, or
federally mandated analysis regimen. The companies name is;

RINCON CONSULTANTS. (MORE ABOUT THESE BOYS LATER)

FBI agent Michael Templin was deliberately letting me know that;

A. He was aware of everything within my complaint to the OIG.

B. He wanted me to know this.

C. He hadn't sent the information on to the Los Angeles branch. There would be no "review."

D. By contacting me by way of complaint information that listed;

Witnesses names, addresses, phone numers; and what testimony that they could provide. (Primarily against the owners, and agents of Tiger, officers of the court, and Oxnard police.)

I believe that FBI agent Templin was exhibiting that he could, and would use my complaint evidence against me, and potentially, those that had stepped forward to add their voices to mine.

I VIEWED THIS AS A THINLY DISGUISED WARNING, AND THREAT.

(If all that has happened to me, through out the course of this attempt to get law enforcement authorities, both state and federal, to investigate, had happened to you, what would be your assessment of agent Templin's motives be?)

FBI agent Templin's stated motives for requesting my presence, was so that he could inform me that he had talked to Jennifer Youngberg.

She was a criminal investigator, at the Enviromental Protection Agency, that I contacted on the same day as my first phone call to agent Templin. (8-5-03)

He (agent Templin) stated that she had; "Looked into" the information that I had given her, and it was; "her" assessment, that the; "drilling, repairs, and well monitoring, that I observed, was in relation to an EPA mandated change out of underground fuel tanks at; Bill Burkes Chevron" A gas station on the corner of Hemlock, and Victoria.

The far corner of this two city block long, and two city block wide shopping center.

More than 130 yards from the repairs, that I observed, and the test wells I saw drilled, and monitored, behind the cleaners.

I also pointed out to him that the EPA's determination of problems with the underground tanks at the gas station didn't turn up in routine testing, until sometime in early 2002.

And the mandated changeout of the tanks was completed before the year came to an end.

What FBI agent Templin was saying is that;

I was confusing water monitoring wells, that were over 130 yards away, and mis-stated underground repairs, beneath a drycleaners, over 130 yards away.

THAT I OBSERVED IN THE SPRING OF 1999,

WITH COMPLETELY DIFFERENT, ACTIVITIES,

THAT WERE NOT IDENTIFIED AS PROBLEMS UNTIL EARLY 2002.

AT A GAS STATION OVER 130 YARDS AWAY.

I TOLD FBI AGENT TEMPLIN;

"I'M SOME DUMB, NOT PLUMB DUMB."

It is interesting to note that agent Templin was tossing this lame, and essentially worthless rationale into the pot at all.

It is a desperate, feeble, impossible scenario that doesn't help, or hurt his being vindicated, or not, when the OIG's investigation is finalized.

It aids no one, but the owners of Tiger Real Estate Fund. If it is believed.

I found it strange that he would use this time, to make one last attempt to direct me away from Tiger's owners.

I ended my conversation with agent Templin with something along the lines of;

"We would need a time machine for the 2002 repairs at the Chevron station, to be the explanation for the repairs that I saw in 1999, over 130 yards removed from what you are referring to. And they say that I'm delusional. "

I told him that I had to go, as I had been in court all morning, and I was on the lunch break, and had to get back.

It was at this moment that his somewhat cheery, and affable demeanor through out our half hour of discussion, gave way for just a moment.

The bemused smile was gone, replaced by a sullen look, as he said this in a soft mono tone;

"I can't believe that you filed a complaint against me with the Office of the Inspector General."

What agent Templin had trouble believing, I suspect, is that I found a way around the block that he had somehow managed to erect against my being able to file a formal written complaint against the officers of the Ventura County Superior Court.

Blocked at both the Ventura branch office, and the Los Angeles regional office.

And the route that I took to get all of this on the record lashed him firmly to the matter by being the evidence of; "civil liberties violations against my person, by a Department of Justice employee."

I replied;
When I came to you seeking shield and cover from the lawless that have gained control of this court, who were sending me to a mental institution, maybe forever, to shut me up. You told me repeatedly that; "There is nothing that you have told me, that allows me, or this agency to act in this matter."

Agent Templin didn't respond.

Then I said;
"Hey! If that is true, then what do you have to worry about?"

"If that's the case, I'm just pounding sand."

This didn't seem to cheer him up.

Corruption in the Department of Justice-Office of the Inspector General stomewalls my complaint for two years.

Department of Justice- Office of the Inspector General complaint filings.

Dept.of Justice-OIG- status of my complaint-filings

Below are five of the sixteen complaint additions to my original complaint of; "Denial of civil liberties protections by a DOJ employee" that I filed with the Dept. Of Justice- Office of the Inspector General.

My original complaint, and 16 "complaint additions" were sent to the Dept. of Justice-OIG via the DOJ-OIG's secure electronic e-mail site. The original complaint consisted of these two statements;

(#1) "August 5th, 2003: First call to FBI agent Michael Templin."

(#2) "What FBI agent Michael Templin was told about the "Conspiracy to deny my civil liberties"

Between March, 2004, and Sept. 2005, I filed several more "status of complaint" requests through the same DOJ-OIG secure electronic e-mail site that can only be accessed from the DOJ Home web site. Each time I requested basic information, in a civil manner, that anyone would expect a response to.

I NEVER RECIEVED EVEN AN AKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECIEPT RESPONSE FROM THE DOJ-OIG.

A third complaint addition was added in Sept., 2005. It detailed how FBI agent Michael Templin pretended to be HIS own "supervising agent in charge" as he phrased it, to get his hands on a complete copy of my "complaint of civil liberties violations by a Dept. of Justice employee." that I had filed with the DOJ-OIG; AGAINST AGENT TEMPLIN.

This e-mail site is set up to handle nothing else but complaints of this nature.

It can only be accessed from the Dept. of Justices home web page, which states that it was set up to channel complaints of;

"Department of Justice employees who have violated a persons civil liberties." directly to the Office of the Inspector General.

Right above the "submit" button there was a box that had this statement off to its side; "Check here if you want aknowledgment of reciept by the DOJ-OIG of your complaint."

I checked this box. For each of my three complaint filings. As well as for each of my numerous, "status of complaint" queries. Complaint filing after complaint filing.

Right up until this day, (Jan. 17th, 2007) I have yet to recieve aknowledgement from the DOJ-OIG that my complaint has even been recieved.

These last 5 "status of complaint" queries, which I sent after 11 other ones, that the DOJ-OIG never responded to, became more and more disdainful of the obvious stone walling of my complaint.

BY THE INVESTIGATIVE ARM OF THE DOJ.

The tone of each became more sarcastic, and angry. I wanted them to know that I wasn't going away.

I wasn't gonna turn loose of FBI agent Michael Templin.

And that from this point on, I was going to come after them in every way that was legal.

I served the DOJ-OIG notice that; "IT WAS ON!"


**************************************
Sir,

Once again, I request the status of my complaint of civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee.

Once again, I request the name of the investigating agent in charge.

Once again, I request the name and address of the person that I can send additional case information to.

Once again, I request assistance in removing the block placed upon my person by someone within the FBI.

That keeps me from filing a civil liberties complaint against officers of the Ventura Calif. Superior Court. For violations of my due process, and denial of my right to equal protection under the law.

Once again, I inform you that my life, and liberty are at serious risk of being lost, due to the repeated criminal actions, committed against my person by officers of the Ventura County Superior Court.

Criminal actions that FBI agent Michael Templin is well aware of.

Criminal actions that FBI agent Michael Templin might share complicity in.

Your office acts as if such things have no precedence, and therefore must not be occurring in this instance.

Your office acts as if no federal agent of the Department Of Justice has ever committed crimes of this seriousness and nature, and therefore could not possibly be guilty of such in this matter.

Your office, by not responding even once, in over 20 months to my complaint additions, or repeated pleas for help, acts as though there is no need for anyone from your office to question me.

Is this because you have questioned agent Templin, and his immediate superior, and their assurances that there is no need for your office to look any further into this matter is sufficient?

Does the Office of the Inspector General exist to uncover criminal actions by DOJ employees, or is the function of your office now primarily to keep criminal actions, by DOJ employees, from being viewed in the light of day?

Is it the aim of your office to uphold the rule of law, as concerns the actions of DOJ employees, or is it to sweep such serious instances as I have alleged under the "rug"?

Are you refusing to investigate my allegations in an effort to keep criminal actions by a DOJ employee from besmirching the reputation of the DOJ?

Once again, I request the aid of your office in this matter.

Once again, I request that your office contact me, as concerns the disposition of this matter.

Once again, I request that the DOJ-OIG uphold the law.

Once again I ask that the DOJ-OIG perform their oath sworn duty, as concerns this matter.

FREE THE TRUTH.
CHAIN THE LIE.

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.


Respectfuly, and sincerely,

Glen Michael Wilson
xxxx * Fisher Way,
Oxnard, Calif. 93033

*************************************** ******

More Dept of Justice stonewalling

To: Inspector General-Department Of Justice
From: Glen Michael Wilson

Subject: DOJ-OIG's refusal to initiate a fair, and credible investigation of "civil liberties violations by a DOJ employee" (That I filed with the DOJ-OIG against FBI agent Michael Templin, Ventura Calif. branch, over two years ago.)

Sir,
Over two years ago, I initiated a complaint of; "civil liberties violations by a Department of Justice employee", via the secure e-mail site that your agency had set up to deal with this issue, and this issue alone.

In this period of time, I have not even received "acknowledgment of receipt" of my complaint by you office.

Even though I have requested in over 15 complaint addition filings, via your complaint e-mail site. The most basic information, as to the status of my complaint, that anyone would expect a response to;

SUCH AS;

Name of the investigating agent in charge of my complaint.

Status of my complaint,

To what person, and in what manner do I send witness names, and additional court records evidence, that supports the veracity of my complaint.

I have recently learned from a FBI agent that my case has been sent back to the FBI as a: "management referral, in house determination of how to proceed, as pertains to your complaint. against FBI agent Michael Templin."

WHAT IN THE HELL IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN?

I recognize disingenuous double speak that is designed to be devoid of any real meaning when it is sent my way. Especially when it is designed to deflect my two year, numerously repeated attempts to get your office to; "uphold the Law and perform your oath sworn duties."

If my allegations have no merit, go on the record as to what I have stated as true about FBI agent Michael Templin's actions that are not.

What is the basis for the DOJ's Office of the Inspector General to abrogate its duties to be the investigative arm of the DOJ when the investigation of allegations of civil liberties violations are brought against a DOJ employee?

Is it the policy of the DOJ-OIG to ignore all attempts by a citizen who has lodged a complaint to learn what the status of his complaint IN REALITY IS?

Please respond to this e-mail by contacting me via my e-mail.

e-mail:glenmwilsonking@hotmail.com

I have made some of the most serious allegations of criminal actions by a DOJ employee that any one can bring.

Investigate honestly, and fairly.

Refute my allegations,
OF SERIOUS CRIMINAL ACTIONS BY FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN,
(Ventura, Calif. branch office)
or
Confirm their veracity. IN WRITING.

Send me a copy.

Sincerely,
Glen Michael Wilson


FREE THE TRUTH. CHAIN THE LIE.

*************************************** *****

DOJ-Office of the Inspector General blocks investigation

Corrupt cops, judges, prosecutors, FBI personnel and the billionaire criminals that love them.

Federal stonewalling bottom feeding morally bankrupt individuals on parade.

After you get about one third of the way through this thirteenth request for; "status of my complaint" after almost a year and a half of total silence fro the DOJ-OIG you will notice that my tone, as well as intent of the letter both undergo a shifting of the paradigm.

Shortly after I wrote this, I re-read it and thought to myself; "Mikey, you lost it." Looking back on it again with another 16 months of silence by the DOJ-OIG added to their initial 16 months of stonewalling, I now believe that: "Mikey, you found it!"

From the writing of this request for; "status of complaint" that changed into a full on, legitimate, disgust filled rant at the bottom feeders that have been placed in their lofty positions of power and authority to negate the Law.

*************************************** ************************

From: Glen Michael Wilson
To: Office of the Inspector General - DOJ

Subject: Continued stonewalling of my complaint by DOJ-OIG

Sir,
Once again, I am contacting the DOJ-OIG, as I have over a dozen times in the past 16 months, by way of the electronic (e-mail) "complaint of civil liberties violation by a DOJ employee." intake site that is listed on your Department of Justice "Official Website" as the acceptable avenue, set up by the DOJ-OIG to initiate a complaint of this nature via e-mail against a DOJ employee.

Once again, I am hoping against hope that this renewed attempt to have my complaint reviewed, investigated, and answered by your office, (OIG) as to the allegations that I have brought forward again, and again.

Answered by the Office of the Inspector General, as to what your findings are. As relates to the veracity of my allegations against DOJ employee, FBI agent Michael Templin, (Ventura Calif. branch) and the merits, or lack of such, as pertains to the civil liberties violations that I allege.

*** From day one, over 16 months ago, I have been met with silence by the OIG.

***From day one, ALL requests for "STATUS OF INVESTIGATION" have been met with silence.

***From day one, ALL attempts to ascertain who I should send pertinent evidence; ie; court records, pictures, and substantiating testimony from credible witnesses, has been met with complete silence.

***From day one, ALL attempts to gain the name of the investigating agent from the DOJ-OIG's that is in charge of reviewing my complaint has been met with..., You guessed it! SILENCE!

*** THIS ISN'T AN INVESTIGATION OF A CITIZEN'S COMPLAINT.

THIS IS A COVER-UP OF A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEE'S CRIMINAL ACTIONS . BY THE "SUPPOSED" INVESTIGATIVE ARM OF THE DOJ.

IF YOU COULD PUT YOUR "FINDINGS" IN WRITING, THAT COULD REFUTE MY TRUTHFUL TESTIMONY, YOU WOULD HAVE.

YOU CAN'T AND YOU DAMN WELL KNOW IT DON'T YOU?

THE VERY FACT THAT AGENTS FROM YOUR OFFICE, WHEN CONTACTED BY ME VIA THE DOJ-OIG's 1-800 NUMBER; MISDIRECT, DISCONNECT, AND GENERALLY DEFLECT EVERY ATTEMPT THAT I HAVE MADE TO LEARN THE STATUS OF MY COMPLAINT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT YOUR ACTIONS, MUCH LIKE FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN'S CAN NOT STAND THE LIGHT OF DAY, PUBLIC SCRUTINY, OR THE RULE OF LAW.

NOR HAS YOUR CONSTITUTIONALLY MANDATED, SACRED OATH SWORN DUTY TO: "PROTECT AND DEFEND THE LAWS OF THIS LAND FROM ALL ENEMIES, BOTH FOREIGN, AND DOMESTIC." BEEN HONORED.

I ADD YOU TO MY COMPLAINT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS AGAINST MY PERSON BY A DOJ EMPLOYEE.

I WILL TAKE IT UP WITH THOSE OF THIS NATION WITH OVERSIGHT AND CORRECTIVE POWERS OVER THE DOJ AS RELATES TO YOUR "OFFICIAL" (what a joke) ACTIONS.

SORRY 'BOUT YOUR BAD LUCK.

NEVER IN MY LIFE HAVE I SEEN A MORE MORALLY REPREHENSIBLE COLLECTION OF WORTHLESS STONEWALLING INDIVIDUALS AS EVIDENTLY POPULATES THE DOJ-OIG.

I BET CONGRESS CAN, AND WILL "THIN OUT THE HERD" (HEY! IT'S NATURES WAY!) AT THE DOJ-OIG.

HOW STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE ANYWAY?

*** THE TRUTH DOESN'T BEND KNEE TO LIE. (it's you people who can't face the facts and have been in hiding for almost a year and a half. That's gonna come to an end real soon!)

*** I WILL LEGALLY, AND LAWFULLY COME AFTER EVERY MEMBER OF THE DOJ THAT HAS BEEN "FOULING" THEIR OWN NEST" (ie. Aiding and abbetting those from within the DOJ ranks that are committing criminal acts in the name of the Law.)

*** I DON'T QUIT. I HATE LIARS. I PLAY TO WIN, AND USUALLY DO.

I would take a long sober look at the mountain of verifiable evidence that can, and will lead to indictable charges of the most severe in nature against anyone and everyone on the downside of the evidentiary paper trail.

You will quickly realize that all who have "signed off" on blocking this matter from a fair and impartial review of my allegations and evidence by those within the DOJ's investigative arm, the OIG are in a legally untenable position.

*** We won't even go into the complete absence of anything like moral, or ethical behavior exhibited by anyone within the DOJ-OIG as concerns this matter, beyond this stark truth evidenced by your employees EVERY action;

"THIS PRESENT OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IS COMPLETELY DEVOID OF ANY ETHICAL STANDARDS, AND BOUNDRIES.

YOU HAVE WANDERED DOWN THAT DARK ROAD THAT IS TAKEN BY THOSE THAT ARE MORALLY BANKRUPT.

*** YOU HAVE BECOME THAT WHICH HAS NO BOTTOM TO HOW LOW YOU WILL GO TO ADVANCE THE AIMS OF THE LAWLESS, AND THE LIE, THAT IS AT BATTLE WITH THE LAW AND WHAT IS TRUE.

ANYONE WHO WOULD DO THIS IS A FOOL.

DO YOU THINK THAT YOU CAN CONTROL THE INVESTIGATIVE OFFICE OF THE DOJ, SO THAT YOU'LL HAVE A FREE HAND TO DO SUCH THINGS AND NOT SUFFER THE FULL FURIOUS WRATH, AND DESERVED PENALTY THAT THE SPIRIT OF JUSTICE WILL DEMAND?

AND ENTERTAIN NO DOUBT ABOUT THIS; JUSTICE WILL EXACT THE PRICE IN FULL FROM THOSE THAT SWEAR THEIR LOYALTY TO JUSTICE, ONLY SO THAT THEY CAN COME NEAR ENOUGH TO TAKE DEADLY AIM AT BOTH THE LEGAL MANIFESTATION, AS WELL AS THE "SPIRIT" OF JUSTICE ?

*** I SWEAR THIS TO YOU NOW. EVEN IF I LOSE, YOU WON'T WIN. ***

EVERYONE THAT READS A PAPER IN THIS COUNTRY IS GONNA KNOW YOUR NAMES.

WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE.

HOW MORALLY BANKRUPT YOU ALL ARE AS INDIVIDUALS.

AND THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY ARE GONNA HOWL FOR YOUR WORTHLESS PROFFESSIONAL HIDE TO BE TANNED, AND TACKED UP IN PUBLIC.

*** GUESS WHAT? CONGRESS WILL OBLIGE.

You have just been served notice;

"YOU WILL BE WEIGHED ON THE TRUE SCALES OF JUSTICE"

GRAB IT AND GROWL.

GLEN MICHAEL WILSON

FREE THE TRUTH - CHAIN THE LIE

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.

IN DEFENSE OF THE LAWS OF THIS NATION AND STATE I WILL CONTINUE TO BATTLE ALL OF THOSE WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THAT ARE LAWLESS, AND FAITHLESS SERVANTS OF THE LAW.

UNTIL THE DAY THAT I SEE YOU CHARGED WITH CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY DUE PROCESS, AND CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW.

THESE CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST ME UNDER THE COLOR OF AUTHORITY.

YOU WILL ANSWER TO THE LAW. WHAT WILL YOU SAY?
*************************************** *****

As you can tell by the tone of this request by me to the Department Of Justice- Office Of The Inspector General, to get off their ass, I am getting fed up with what by this time is blatant stone walling on their part.

CAN YOU BLAME ME?
*************************************** *************************************** **

WED., AUGUST, 24th, 2005

TO: DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE-OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL
FROM: GLEN MICHAEL WILSON
SUBJECT: COMPLAINT ADDITION OF: "CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS BY A DOJ EMPLOYEE". (FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN, VENTURA CA. BRANCH)

THIS IS AN ADDITION TO MY 18 MONTH OLD COMPLAINT OF MY CIVIL LIBERTIES BEING VIOLATED BY A DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EMPLOYEE. ( FBI AGENT, MICHAEL TEMPLIN, VENTURA CALIF. BRANCH)

THIS IS THE FOURTEENTH, OR FIFTEENTH COMPLAINT ADDITION THAT I HAVE SENT TO YOUR OFFICE.

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE AT ALL FROM THE DOJ-OIG AS TO RECIEPT OF MY COMPLAINT.

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE BY THE DOJ- OIG AS TO MY REPEATED QUERIES AS TO THE; "STATUS OF THE INVESTIGATION"

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE FROM YOUR OFFICE AS TO; "WHO IS THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER?" AND; "HOW CAN I CONTACT HIM?"

***WITHOUT ANY RESPONSE FROM THE OIG TO MY QUERY; "WHERE DO I SEND THE THE COURT RECORDS, PHOTOS, AND NAMES, AND ADDRESSES OF WITNESSES, THAT MAKE UP THE EVIDENCE OF DOJ EMPLOYEE, FBI AGENT MICHAEL TEMPLIN'S CIVIL LIBERTIES VIOLATIONS AGAINST MY PERSON?"

***WITHOUT ANYONE FROM YOUR OFFICE RESPONDING TO MY PLEAS FOR HELP, GETTING THE FBI BRANCH IN VENTURA CALIF., AND THE FBI BRANCH IN LOS ANGELES, CALIF. TO ALLOW ME TO FILE A FORMAL WRITTEN COMPLAINT OF; "DENIAL OF MY CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS TO; DUE PROCESS, AND DENIAL OF MY RIGHT TO EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW." AGAINST THE VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT PERSONEL THAT; "CONSPIRED TO DENY ME MY CIVIL LIBERTIES PROTECTIONS, UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW."

*** HAVE YOU NO INTEREST IN SUCH HIGH CRIMES?

*** IS THIS JUST "BUSINESS AS USUAL?

*** IF YOU ARE SO SURE THAT MY ALLEGATIONS ARE BASELESS, (OR FOOLISHLY BELIEVE THAT THIS PRETENSE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH A CREDIBLE DEFENSE AT YOUR TRIAL) REFUTE THEM.

THAT SHOULD BE SIMPLE ENOUGH FOR YOUR OFFICE, WHICH IS CHOCK FULL OF SOME OF THE FINEST LEGAL MINDS IN THIS COUNTRY.

***YOU CAN USE THIS WEALTH OF LEGAL TALENT TO ASCERTAIN THE TRUTH OF THIS MATTER IN LESS THAN AN HOUR, IF AFTER 18 MONTHS OF STICKING YOUR HEAD IN THE SAND, (OR, HAS IT BEEN SOMEWHERE ELSE ALL THIS TIME?) YOU ARE OF A MIND TO FINALLY DO YOUR JOB, WHICH IS TO INVESTIGATE. ISN'T IT?

***OR, YOU CAN USE THE ENTIRE BUILDING FULL OF STEEL TRAP LEGAL MINDS TO STAVE OFF THE INEVITIBLE, IGNOBLE ENDING OF YOUR PROFFESSIONAL CAREER, FOR A SHORT WHILE LONGER.

***ASK THEM FOR THEIR LEGAL OPINION AS TO JUST HOW UNTENABLE YOUR SITUATION IS FROM A LEGAL/CRIMINAL, POLITICAL, ETHICAL, PUBLIC RELATIONS, POSTER CHILD OF A SOCIAL PARIAH KIND OF STAND POINT.

I'M SURE THAT BETWEEN THE PIE CHARTS, GRAPHS, TEA LEAVES, AND OUIJA BOARD, THEY WILL FIND A WAY TO CONVEY ADEQUATELY TO YOU JUST HOW BIG A LOAD OF BAD STINK YOU'RE WALKING AROUND WITH IN YOUR SHORTS.

YES I SAID; "YOU HAVE A BIG LOAD OF BAD STINK IN YOUR SHORTS. " IT'S BEEN THERE FOR OVER 18 MONTHS ALREADY.

BY GOD MAN! CLEAN YOUR SELF UP!

***ONCE AGAIN!
I REQUEST FROM THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL THE FOLLOWING;

1. STATUS OF MY COMPLAINT.

2. PROGRESS, (IF ANY) OF THE INVESTIGATION.

3. NAME OF THE INVESTIGATING AGENT/OFFICER.

4. HOW TO CONTACT HIM. (INVESTIGATING OFFICER)

5. WHERE, AND TO WHO DO I SEND THE EVIDENTIARY MATERIAL; VENTURA SUPERIOR COURT TRANSCRIPTS, DOCKET ENTRIES, (ALL 1,207 OF THEM), PHOTOS, AND WITNESS NAMES THAT ANY SELF RESPECTING INVESTIGATOR WOULD WANT TO TAKE POSSESSION OF. WOULDN'T HE?

6. ASSISTANCE FROM THE DOJ-OIG IN GETTING THE VENTURA CALIF., AND LOS ANGELES CALIF., BRANCHES OF THE FBI TO LIFT THE BLOCK THAT DOJ EMPLOYEES HAVE PLACED ON MY BEING ALOWED TO FILE A FORMAL COMPLAINT, LISTING MY ALLEGATIONS OF NUMEROUS OFFICERS OF THE VENTURA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, COMMITTING MULTIPLE COUNTS OF; "CONSPIRACY TO DENY ME MY DUE PROCESS, AND EQUAL PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW", WITH THE "SERIOUS AS A HEART ATTACK" ENHANCEMENT OF; "UNDER THE COLOR OF LAW"

7. DO YOUR JOB. INVESTIGATE. THIS ONE IS EASY.

EVERY ONE IN OXNARD THAT I HAVE SHOWN JUST THE COURT GENERATED EVIDENCE "GETS" WHAT IS HAPPENING IN A MATTER OF MINUTES.

YOU WON'T HAVE ANY TROUBLE. THAT IS, UNLESS YOU WON'T HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY.

OH, AND TAKE A LONG SHOWER. USE LOTS OF SOAP. AND CHANGE THEM SHORTS STINKY!


AS ALWAYS,
SINCERELY
GLEN MICHAEL WILSON

FREE THE TRUTH. - CHAIN THE LIE.

JUSTICE ONLY FLOWS FROM WHAT IS TRUE.

I'M SOME DUMB, NOT PLUMB DUMB.

STILL ALIVE FOR NOW. NO THANKS TO YOU

---

Never Miss an Email
Stay connected with Yahoo! Mail on your mobile. Get started!