     Docket Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Case has 1210 Docket Entries. 2001044311 Glen Wilson
Docket Entries
|
On April 7th, 2003, 463 days after my arrest on December, 27th 2001, for a
simple possession charge, my first of seventeen jury trial dates, was seconds
away from beginning.
Except that it didn't. In my wildest dreams, I never would have imagined
that it would be another 530 plus days before my trial finally did begin, on September 20th, 2004.
FIRST TRIAL DATE April 7th, 2003
After 15 months in "case hearing Hell", jury trial was finally set to start in
court room 45. Judge Kevin McGee presiding.
Derailed until May, 5th,2003.
By prosecution lying to the court and defense, as to reason that delay was
needed. Gaining an unwarranted delay to the start of trial by deception.
Senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, lied to both the court,
and defense to gain this last second, delay to the of the start of trial.
Needing my agreement, she falsely stated that the delay was needed so that
she could send to North Carolina, for my 32 year old, 1970 involuntary manslaughter conviction records.
Stating on the record, to both the court and defense, that the second strike attach-ment; "most likely wasn't applicable, because Mr. Wilson wasn't a
part of the blooding."
D.D.Atty. Taylor went on to say that she needed to see my (1970) conviction records, before she could remove the strike allegation from my present
charge.
Knowing that I would almost certainly give her this delay for the purpose
of getting rid of the strike attachment, that mandated a mandatory
sentence of six years.
I did. Based upon the prosecution's stated reason.
(Which I later learned was a lie.)
In the hopes of returning the case to; "normal sentence guidlines" which
said that a sentence of 6 months, to eighteen months, was the appropriate sentence, if found guilty at trial.
The Ventura County Superior Court's own guidleines state that both the prosecution, and the defense, should be ready to;
Drop charges (prosecution)
Or plead guilty,(defense)
Or go to trial, within 300 days of charges being brought;
"except in the most complex cases, and the most serious crimes."
My charges, and case had neither of these elements. It was a simple
possession case.
My word against two Oxnard police officers.
You would think that the prosecution would have been ready for this one
at the end of 90 days. I would have been ready. If I had a public defender
that would have done anything that I told him that I needed to be done.
Instead, here we were, finally at my first trial date. Which the prosecution
hastily delays. For the first of seventeen times, 463 days after charges were brought.
On this day, even with this delay, I would have never believed that I would
not get to the start of my jury trial for another 530 days.
But d.d.atty. Taylor had to think fast on April 7th, 2003. Because a judge,
that wasn't privy to the prosecutions reluctance to have two Oxnard
police officers perjure themselves on the stand, noticed that this case
was already a half a year over the maximum time that a case was to be
allowed to languish in case hearing purgatory.
Upon this judge's discovery of this fact, he stated to both the prosecution
and defense;
"This (case) has gone on way to long. I am ordering the prosecution, and
defense to report to the fourth floor, courtroom 45, forthwith. Trial will
begin immediately."
So that's what we did. Myself at the defense table, and senior deputy
district attorney Catharine Taylor at the prosecutions table.
Several minutes later, a pool of 55 potential jurors files between our
respective tables, to be chambered in a room behind, and to the side of
where the judge would preside over this matter.
We were seconds away from the start of trial, when d.d.atty. Taylor
jumped up, and requested the 30 day delay.
The judge, with an exasperated tone, queried; "For what?"
Knowing that she needs my agreement, she tosses out the only reason
that should have enough value to me to gain my agreement. Removing
the second strike attachment, which mandated a mandatory sentence
of six years, if convicted, from my charge of simple possession.
************************************************************************
SECOND TRIAL DATE: May 5th, 2003.
The second DERAILMENT to the start of trial.
Requested by the prosecution. Agreed to by the defense. Granted by the
court. Trial reset to start on May 28th, 2003.
By yet another round of lying to the court, and defense, as to why this
extension of another month was needed.
Senior deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor, stating on the record,
that she was; "still waiting for North Carolina to send her my (1970)
conviction records."
RECORDS THAT SHE NEVER SENT FOR.
I was unaware at that time as to just how unwilling the prosecution was
to let this matter be heard by a jury. I had been brought up to believe
that judges, prosecutors, and public defenders were dedicated, honest,
and ethical people for the most part.
I imagined that the main reason that the prosecution had initially
attached the second strike allegation was because of a "shared
enforcement attitude" between the police, and prosecution. Which
meant that I wasn't the one in this process that was going to get the
benefit of the doubt.
By the end of these two thirty day delays, that the prosecution gained
by lying to the court and defense;
With my RV (home) set on fire, with some flamable liquid squirted
through the side window, all over my mattress, and then ignited.
(That a friend noticed almost immediately after it began, and kept
knocked down, and localized to that one area, by grabbing the large
commercial extinquisher from the Chevron gas station that I was
parked behind.
A fire that took the Oxnard fire Dept. over 10 minutes to respond to
Even though their fire station was only two blocks away.
A fire that no Oxnard fire fighter talked to me at all about. Even
though I arrived shortly after they did, and people notified them
that; "Here comes the owner of the RV."
A fire that no Oxnard police officer ever showed up on the scene
of, to take a report, or investigate.)
With my RV (home) ticketed repeatedly, (3,000 dollars worth)
then impounded; This activity beginning within 5 days after the
intentionaly set fire in my RV didn't destroy my home.
With 5 of my friends told by an Oxnard police officer that; "they
were next" if I was allowed to eat, sleep, rest, shower, or use the
phone;
With the addition of two more bogus arrests, at my place of
employment to get me fired; Starting with my arrest on April
20th, 2003, by Oxnard police officer Brislinger.
And concluding with my false arrest at my place of employment
on May, 15th, 2003 by Oxnard police officer, Martin Polo.
With the last two weeks of the second delay to the start of my jury
trial spent in jail; Because of my second false arrest at my place of
employment, on May 15th, 2003.
At which the same senior deputy district attorney that said the two
30 day delays were needed to send for my records; "so that second
strike could be with- drawn."
Was now telling a judge not to set bail in any amount. Because the
district attorneys office was seeking another strike attachment on
the new charge. And if I lost at trial on both counts, I would recieve
a mandatory 25 to life prison sentence.
I was forced to abandon my life long belief that it was an inherent
decency, and strong ethical code that motivated most of those that
professed their service to the law, and its defense. (At least in this
county. As concerns the financial well being of Tiger Real Estate
Fund LP's owners.)
That was something else precious to me that was stolen by these
people.
**************************************************
THIRD TRIAL DATE:
May 28th, 2003
Trial was once again derailed.
Re-scheduled for June, 13th, 2003.
By a block being placed on my being brought from cell to court,
for the start of my trial.
That the Ventura County Sheriffs Department's legal unit head,
(E. Hobin) couldn't get lifted. With two hours in which to accomplish
a transfer that takes 5 to 7 minutes, (through an underground tunnel
that connected the jail with the court) and a willingness to comply
with a lawful court order to produce me in court.
Sending me a letter that afternoon, to let me know that she tried. It
had her official Ventura County Sheriff Dept.'s, legal unit letter head.
Signed and dated.
It said; "I am very sorry Mr. Wilson; Despite my best efforts, I could
not get you into court for the start of your trial."
As frightening as it was to be in a legal dispute in which every judge,
prosecutor, and public defender was lined up against the truth, and
the Rule of Law being a factor in the proceedings, it was the realization
that they could, and would just refuse to "produce me" in court on a
court ordered trial date that sent my fear on its way towards terror.
This period of time to me was the legal equivalent of a knock down,
drag out, wide eyed nightmare.
Little did I know that this was just round one, of a no round limit,
illegal donneybrook.
But on May 28th, 2003. Which was the third "start of jury trial
derailment by this court, Senior Deputy District Attorney Catharine
Taylor was in the court room for the "start" of my trial.
And she remained silent, as the judge called my name three times,
allowing him to think that I was on the street, absconding. Which
resulted in all of my "own recognizance, (promise to appear) bails
being revoked.
Knowing full well that I was upstairs in a jail cell. Where she had
made sure that I would be.
JUDGE CLONINGER'S BETRAYAL:
OF THE LAW, TRUTH, AND HIS OFFICE.
*****************************************************
 Docket Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Case has 1210 Docket Entries. 2001044311 Glen Wilson
Docket Entries
NOTE ABOVE: THAT ON DOCKET ENTRY LINE 06-03-2003 IN MORNING COURT IN JUDGE CLONINGER'S COURT ROOM, THAT I AM "PRO PER" (I can speak in my own legal defense.) And have been in jail for two weeks with a "NO BAIL" warrant. NOW LOOK AT docket entries:06-03-2003-Lines 24;25;and26 for afternoon court of the same day. I am now represented by a public defender; (I have lost my right to speak in my own legal defense. AND a "NO BAIL INCARCERATION" has been turned into a; "promise to appear" release from jail. **************************************** NOW; LOOK AT DOCKET ENTRIES; 06-16-2003 Lines 8; and 9 THE FIRST WORDS SPOKEN IN COURT BY MY "COERCED INTO TAKING AS COUNSEL" BY JUDGE CLONINGER, "IF" I WANTED OUT OF JAIL.
|
| Docket Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Case has 1210 Docket Entries. 2001044311 Glen Wilson
Docket Entries
|
| Docket Information | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This Case has 1210 Docket Entries. 2001044311 Glen Wilson
Docket Entries
|
FOURTH TRIAL DATE: June 13th, 2003.
Jury trial date was vacated,
(THAT'S A FANCY WORD FOR; DERAILED)
By judge Cloninger, on June 3rd, 2003
With out any discussion.
Re-scheduled for June 17th, 2003.
This was on the day, (6-3-03) that judge Cloninger illegally, and
coercively forces me to; "give up my right to speak in my own legal
defense."
By tieing my release from jail on an O.R. bail, on a charge that was
classified as "no bail" to my taking a pre-positioned, pre-determined,
(by judge Cloninger) public defender, Randy Tucker on all my charges,
after two weeks inside jail.
This was judge Cloninger's direct response to my attempting to bring
misconduct charges, (2) counts, against the senior deputy district
attorney I was up against, (Catharine Taylor) and showing him that
I could prove misconduct.
When I tried to get judge Cloninger to convene a misconduct hearing
on this date, by stating to him, in court, and on the record;
"I want to file two counts of prosecutorial misconduct against senior
deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor. For twice lying to the court,
and defense, to gain two unwarranted, and illegal delays to the start
of my jury trial."
I went on by telling judge Cloninger; "The first time she lied, was on
April 7th , 2003. When she requested a 30 day delay to the start of my
trial to, as she stated on the record; "send to North Carolina, for a copy
of my 32 year old involuntary manslaughter conviction records."
Her stated reason for needing these records was to "verify that I wasn't
eligible" for the second strike attachment to my charge." So that it
(strike) could be removed."
"The second time she lied was a month later, on May 5, 2003. When she
stated on the record that she was still waiting for my 32 year old
conviction records. For the same stated reason."
"On May 20th, just two weeks after her last stating on the record that
she needed these records "to remove the strike" from my charge, she
states on the record at my preliminary hearing on a new possession
charge, that the prosecution is going to seek that an additional strike
be attached to this new charge.
Telling the judge that if I lost at trial on both charges that I would
recieve a mandatory 25 to life sentence.
That because of such a severe sentence, I was a potential flight risk.
Ending with; "For this reason, we (the district attorneys office) feel
that bail set at any amount should be denied."
I then told judge Cloninger, that during these two 30 day delays to
the start of my trial;
That I was arrested twice at my place of employment.
Also that the Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) told the bartender
to tell the owners; "If you want to keep your liquor license, let Mikey
(me) go."
About the arson fire on my RV, (in the middle of a shopping center)
that no responding fire fighter talked to me about.
Also that no Oxnard police officer responded to. About the same
Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) placing over $3,000 in tickets
on my RV then impounding it.
About the same Oxnard police officer (Martin Polo) telling 5 of my
friends; "You let Mikey eat, sleep, rest, shower, or use the phone,
you're next."
About deputy district attorney Catharine Taylor's "volunteering"
for rookie d.d.atty. arraignment detail, to "short-stop" me at
arraigment.
About her 180 degree, on the record, change of statements on May
20th, from what her stated intentions as to my strike attachment
were two weeks previous to that date, on (May 5th) and four weeks
previous to that date on April 7th, 2003.
About the block being placed on my being brought from my cell, to
trial, on May 28th, that the head of the; Ventura County Sheriffs
Department's Legal Unit (Her name is E. Hobin) could not over ride.
Showing him the letter from her, to that effect.
I then told judge Cloninger; That based upon all of these illegal
actions, (by police and jail personnel) coupled with senior deputy
district attorney Catharine Taylor's deceptive statements, (on the
record) and actions (in open court) to both the court and defense;
That I believe that d.d. atty. Taylor has lied to both this court, and
the defense, when she stated that she needed these two 30 delays to
the start of my trial to secure my 32 year old conviction records.
I am sure that he wasn't surprised that I had "put two, and two"
together. But figured; "suspecting something, and proving something,"
are two different things.
But when I told him that I wanted to see verification from the District
Attorney's Office, that D.D.Atty. Catharine Taylor, had indeed sent to
North Carolina, for my 32 year old conviction records, between the
dates of; April 7th, 2003, and May 5th, 2003.
Because if they couldn't produce verification, then they lied to the
court and defense twice, to ilegally deny me my right to speedy trial.
Judge Cloniger knew that I had stumbled on the "End Game Win" if
he abided by the law, and convened a misconduct hearing before my
case proceeded any further.
He wasn't "allowed" to let these proceedings end in this manner.
This is evidenced by the fact that what he has to do to regain control
of me, and silence me totally, as to what I can get into the public
record, couldn't be done unless;
This judge is willing;
A court appointed counsel is willing
A court certified psychologist is willing;
and;
The Mental health director for the County of Ventura, is willing;
To commit high federal felonies.
In concert with each other.
Repeatedly.
That carry many years in federal prison on each and every count.
AND EACH TIME THAT THEY DO, THEY MUST LEAVE DAMNING
EVIDENCE OF THEIR GUILT IN THE COURT'S OWN RECORD.
This is something that no one is going to do, unless there is something,
and that means someone, that they fear more than spending the rest
of their lives in prison.
Some one ordered these people to; "Fall on their swords." And they did.
From here on out, everything that every officer of this court does, is
done with the knowledge that; "There it is, right there in the record.
Evidence of my guilt."
It is amazing how many officers of this court have saved all their fear
of displeasing someone; That trumps the wrath of federal prosecutors,
and judges, and the hellish penalties that they can make real, and
lifelong in these peoples lives.
They had their orders. They had a plan. It was a stupid plan. But it is
still working. So I guess it wasn't that stupid.
The plan was illegal as all get out, and this was just the first phase.
*********************************************************
FIFTH TRIAL DATE: June 17th, 2003,
Jury trial date is derailed on June 16th, 2003. At a reference hearing.
That was also set on June 3rd, 2003. For this exact purpose.
This was "phase 2" of the plan to move past the month by month
delays to the start of trial, and just take "right to a speedy trial,"
right on out of the picture.
The judge, (Cloninger) on June 3rd, 2003, had coercively, and illegally
attached the condition of giving up my right to speak in my own defense,
if I wanted to be released from jail. I did so to get out of jail.
My new court appointed counsel, Randy Tucker that was pre-picked by
judge Cloninger, and pre-positioned by the arraignment cage, for what
came next.
Which was to request a competency hearing.
With public defender Randy Tucker's very first words as my counsel.
With out ever talking to me.
With no history ever of mental health problems, treatment, or
recommendations for such.
With no one in my life ever recommending that I should even switch to decaffienated coffee.
With no outbursts at all, in the 19 months that I had been reporting to
court.
With no officer of the court ever complaining about my behavior, or
ability to understand the proceedings, or of my exhibiting an inability
to articulate what I wanted to say to the court.
Evidently, none of these "indicators" of mental health problems are
needed.
Not when every one from judge, prosecutor, public defender, court
certified psychologist, and county mental health director are lined
up in opposition to the rule of law, and what was true being entered
into the courts record, and weighed by a jury, as to its veracity and
import.
AS AN ADDED BONUS; MY RIGHT TO SPEEDY TRIAL VANISHES
WITH THESE FIRST WORDS OF MY "ILLUSION OF COUNSEL."
Because the right to a speedy trial is only a right in criminal court.
Competency hearings are a product of civil court. Where there is no
"right to speedy trial."
My right to speedy trial was literally stolen from me in the; "Blink
of an eye."
If this last statement sounds a little too melodramatic for you, then
don't take my word for it. Look at the next line after; "defense declares
doubt as to defendents mental competency," in the case hearing
docket entries, of June, 16th, 2003.
It says; Criminal proceedings suspended. Civil proceedings
commence.
My right to a speedy trial was negated for over 8 months.
These souless individuals were hoping that it would have been denied
to me for 6 years.
As it very easily could have been. And if that had been the case. What,
if anything that was left of my spirit, mind and body, would have been
no threat to these people.
This was there hope. This was their wish. That I would lose my sanity,
will, intellect, credibility and desire to bring these people before the
court to answer for such crimes as few men in our prisons could bring
themselves to commit.
Two one hour "sessions" with a court certified psychologist (Patrick
Barker) later; I am "found" to be incompetent to stand trial.
Due to an inability to co-operate with my; "coerced into taking,
(by judge Cloninger) if I wanted out of jail" attorney, who had
never spoken to me.
Don't you have to exhibit the former, (non co-operation) to gain
the latter? (finding of incompetency)
This lack of co-operation brought about, according to court-
certified. psychologist. Patrick Barker, by the "one" delusional
belief that he discovered me to be suffering from.
Which was; (Hold onto your socks!) My belief that; "I couldn't
get a fair trial in Ventura County!"
ALSO: That as long as this finding was in effect, I couldn't fire
the souless s.o.b. that did this to me.
You see, as long as this "finding" is in effect; I'm not "well"
enough to make such serious decisions for my self.
So I'm welded to this demonic little imp's side through each
hearing, where he makes sure that nothing that will aid me in
any way makes it into the court's record.
As to my repeated requests to appeal this finding? Well that is
just one more right that he made sure was kept far from me.
LET US NOT FORGET;
The stigma associated with being viewed as; "mentally ill" that
taints every thing that you offer up truthfully to the jury for
their consideration, with an extra thick coating of;"this can't be
true".
Branded as a; "paranoid, and delusional" creature that sees sinister
cabals, and craven hearted conspiracies, from one end of the court,
to the other. Poor guy. You might as well stick a sign on me that says;
UILTY!
It was almost three months after they had this bogus finding of
incompetency, which mandated by law, my immediate remand to
custody, and transfer to Patton State Hospital, on the date the
finding of incompetency was entered into the courts record, before
they finally did so.
This period of time was used by judge Cloninger, mental health
director Marla Biemforde,and my public (enemy) defender (of the lie)
Randy Tucker;In a futile attempt to get me to sign a Ventura County
Mental Health Dept. assessment form that stated; "I have mental
health problems, and I am asking the county of Ventura's Mental
Health Dept. to assist me with treatment."
I was ordered back to court every two weeks, where judge Cloninger,
and p.d. Tucker would promise me that "if" I would sign this form,
they would "fix it" so that I would be treated as an outpatient for my incompetency, as opposed to my being; "locked away in Patton State
Hosp." as they would put it.
I refused. Finally, on October, 27th, 2003. Judge Cloninger convened
a sham remand hearing in court room 11. At 3:00 p.m.
The court was cleared of everyone but those that were a part of what
was going down. A male court stenographer that I had never seen
before was there.
Judge Cloninger;
p.d. Tucker;
Marla Biemforde;
d.d.atty. Inman,
and two bailliffs.
When I entered the court room, I was accompanied by two friends.
Randal Shorts, and Rose Macias. It was immediately obvious that
my friends, and potential witnesses were not wanted in the court
room.
This made clear by the fact that before they could take a seat, one
bailliff took Rose Macias outside the court room, and the other
bailliff took Randal Shorts to the back of it.
Both were brusquely asked; "What are you doing here?"
Then; "What is your relation to Mr. Wilson?"
Both of my friends told the bailliffs that they were just friends, and
that they had given me a ride to court, and were waiting to see if I
needed a ride back home afterward.
What they didn't know was this; Rose Macias, was the former
commissioner of community relations, for the city of Oxnard.
As such, her job was as an oversight investigator of city govt.
malfeasance, and corruption. She was also a graduate of the
Ventura County Police, and Sheriffs Acadamy.
Randal Shorts was a twenty plus year union member long-
shoreman at the Port of Hueneme.
Satisfied after seeing their I.D.'s that they were not reporters,
or represenatives of some state or federal agency, they were
allowed to stay.
Both were witness to my character being slandered and
maligned by Marla Biemforde, who ascribed to me just
about every defect of mental ability, and impairment
of reason, and logic that is known to man.
This is a woman who I had "talked" to for less than an hour.
A woman who slammed her hand down on her desk with great
force, then leaned towards me with as hateful a look on her
face, as I had ever seen on anyones to say; "You sign this
paper right now! Or you're going to be locked away in Patton."
When I told her that I wasn't going to sign the form that said;
"I have mental health problems, and I am asking the Ventura
County Mental Health Dept. to assist me with them."
Telling her that I didn't believe that this statement was true.
Both of my friends were witness to the fact that judge Cloninger
stated that no cross examination of her satements was allowed!
Both of my friends, Rose Macias, and Randal Shorts, had known
me for years.
Both of these people had seen my actions, behavior, and emotional
states on an almost daily basis for years. My ups, and downs. Good
times, and not so good. Both will tell you that they had never
witnessed any erratic behavioral activities, such as Marla Biemforde
described.
No bizzare emotional states, no delusional beliefs that were; "devoid
of reason or logic."
Neither of these people had observed any lapses in my cognitive
ability to deal with life's problems, in a "level headed" manner.
None of this made any difference.
They were already close to three months past the date that the
finding of incompetency was entered into the record.
Almost three months beyond the date that the law mandated my
immediate remand to custody, and transfer to a state mental
hospital. "For treatment, and evaluation."
This remand was now ordered by judge Cloninger.
I asked judge Cloninger for a; "One day stay of this remand, to
get my affairs in order."
Judge Cloninger granted this with a grin. They all were grinning.
I believe that this "grin fest" was the result of these co-conspirators
thinking that this one day stay was requested by me to; "Get the hell
out of Dodge!"
In reality, I requested the one day stay of the courts remand order,
so that the court's record would reflect this fact;
That at 3:00p.m. the next afternoon; I, Glen Michael Wilson, walked
into that court room of my own volition.
Unassisted, unshackled, and reporting as the court had ordered.
The looks of anger, worry, and depression that I saw on their collective
faces when I did report the next day as ordered, made the walk over
to the bailliff to be shackled, and hustled off to jail, and then from
there, to a state mental hospital, for God only knows how long, a little
easier to do.
I dredged up a grin from somewhere, and kept my eyes locked on judge Cloningers, who wasn't grinning today.
I was polite, but in a dismissive sort of way. Saying to judge Cloninger;
"I am here as the court has ordered."
Cloninger, looking depressed said; "Yes. You are."
I then said; "I have told you before; I have great respect for the rule of
law."
Then I finished with; "It's a shame that more people don't feel the same."
Judge Cloninger had nothing to say about that.
I DO HAVE GREAT RESPECT FOR THE RULE OF LAW.
No matter that this was an illegal, unwarranted, travesty of justice on
as grand a scale as I would ever be able to imagine.
I have no right to demand that these lawless individuals who have
gained control of this county's court, be held accountable for their
lawless disregard of the law's of this land, if I can rationalize my
way out of doing the same.
I am a member of this society. I benefit greatly from this being so.
I must honor the social contract of my society. If I am to have any
honor of my own.
Even when I am wronged, or my treatment is unjust.
If my treatment is wrong, and I percieve this to be true, then I am
obligated to help in the search for, or creation of a practical remedy.
If I have been treated unjustly, or see that others have been, I do not
blame the Law.
This is the result of Law's servants forsaking their sacred oath.
This is the result of Law's servants betraying the people who have
bestowed great honor upon them, and entrusted them with great
powers.
When treated unjustly by Law's servants, who no longer serve the
Law;
I ready myself for battle. For they will not give this power that they
now use to shield themselves, and their activities from the Law's
judgement, and Justice's reckoning, over to true servants of the
Law without a fight. For to do so will result in their destruction.
If I can not secure the aid of Law's servants in this battle, I must
wage it none the less. Until the Law's power, and its mechanisms
for implementig Law's powers have been wrested from the lawless.
Who have gained control of Law's authority to negate the Law.
I will engage them in battle in every possible way that I can that
isn't suicidal.
Until I have won, or I am dead.
And on the day that I can no longer believe that there are true servants
of the Law, to be found in the enforcement agencies of this county,
this state, and our federal government, that; "serve Justice" Then I
will seek Law's servants where ever they might be. And "Justice will
be served."
And while Justice is equitable, and fair, that will be of no comfort to
those that have destroyed, and enslaved in the name of the Law, and
in the name of Justice.
For their destruction will be sought, so that "Justice is Served"
For it is much better for all the people of this nation, if death
falls to those that use the Law to kill, hurt, steal, and frighten.
Rather than for this to be the fate of those that resist such evil
being done in the name of the Law
You will note that the court has the "finding of incompetence on
August 8,th 2003. Yet I am not remanded to custody until October
28th, 2003.
A finding of incompetence is a finding of mental illness so severe
that the court orders that a person that incapacitated must be
remansded to custody, for his saftey and societies saftey.
Read the court entry on 8-8-2003 line; 08082003 11 The court finds
the defendant is incompetent to stand trial, understand proceedings
or cooperate with counsel; pursuant to the provisions of Section 1368
of the Penal Code.
This is the definition of a gibbering idiot. To think that someone
would not ever exhibit any evidence of such mental incapacitation
until the day, hour and minute that he attempts to bring true charges
of misconduct against the prosecution is ridiculous way beyond my
ability to adequately express.
Dear Sir:
ReplyDeleteWhat happen to your case: My case is similiar to yours. Please contact me at my e-mail. delgadogloria37@hotmail.com
My name is Gloria Delgado, needed assitance,looked up my case, DOB IS 12/15/1957.
THANK yOU!!!!